A reader spotted an error in this paper by Ros Bramwell and colleagues (BMJ 2006;333:284-6, 5 Aug). The abstract should say that only 34% (not 43%) of obstetricians correctly estimated the probability that a positive screening test result meant that a baby actually had Down's syndrome.
. 2006 Sep 2;333(7566):468.
Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study
Copyright © 2006, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
PMCID: PMC1557960
This corrects the article "Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study" on page 284.