Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1997 Oct;122(3):431–438. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701397

Potentiation by vasopressin of adrenergic vasoconstriction in the rat isolated mesenteric artery

I Noguera *, P Medina *, G Segarra *, M C Martínez *, M Aldasoro *, J M Vila *, S Lluch *,*
PMCID: PMC1564956  PMID: 9351498

Abstract

  1. The aim of the present study was to investigate in rat mesenteric artery rings whether low concentrations of vasopressin could modify the contractile responses to noradrenaline and electrical stimulation of perivascular nerves.

  2. Vasopressin (10−10–10−7M) caused concentration-dependent contractions (pD2=8.36±0.09). The V1-receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP (10−9–10−8M) produced parallel rightward shifts of the control curve for vasopressin. Schild analysis yielded a pA2 value of 9.83 with a slope of 1.10±0.14.

  3. Vasopressin (3×10 −10 and 10−9M) caused concentration-dependent potentiation of the contractions elicited by electrical stimulation (2–8 Hz; 0.2 ms duration for 30 s) and produced leftward shifts of the concentration-response curve for noradrenaline. The V1-receptor antagonist induced concentration-dependent inhibitions of potentiation induced by vasopressin. The selective V1-receptor agonist [Phe*, Orn8]-vasotocin (3×10 −10 and 10−9M) induced potentiation of electrical stimulation-evoked responses which was also inhibited in the presence of the V1 antagonist (10−8M). In contrast, the V2-receptor agonist deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (desmopressin 10−8–10−7M) did not modify the electrical stimulation-induced responses and the V2-receptor antagonist [d(CH2)5, D-Ile*, Ile4, Arg8]-vasopressin (10−8–10−7M) did not affect the potentiation evoked by vasopressin.

  4. In artery rings contracted by 10−6M noradrenaline in the presence of 10−6M guanethidine and 10−6M atropine, electrical stimulation (2, 4 and 8 Hz) produced frequency-dependent relaxations which were unaffected by 10−9M vasopressin but abolished by 10−6M tetrodotoxin.

  5. Vasopressin also potentiated contractions elicited by KCl and contractions induced by addition of CaCl2 to KCl depolarized vessels. The augmenting effects were inhibited by the V1 antagonist.

  6. In the presence of the calcium antagonist nifedipine (10−6M), vasopressin failed to enhance the contractile responses to electrical stimulation, noradrenaline and KCl.

  7. The results demonstrate that low concentrations of vasopressin strongly potentiate the contractions to adrenergic stimulation and KCl depolarization. This effect appears to be mediated by V1 receptor stimulation which brings about an increase in calcium entry through dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.

Keywords: Rat mesenteric artery, V1 and V2 vasopressin receptors, vasopressin antagonists, adrenergic nerve stimulation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (360.8 KB).


Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES