Abstract
The effects of the non-selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin and the selective COX-2 inhibitors, N-[2-(cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl] methanesulphonamide (NS-398), 5-methanesulphonamido-6-(2,4-difluorothio-phenyl)-1-indanone (L-745,337) and 5,5-dimethyl-3-(3-fluorophenyl)-4-(4-methylsulphonyl) phenyl-2(5H)-furanone (DFU), on the protection induced by the mild irritant 20% ethanol were investigated in the rat stomach.
Instillation of 20% ethanol (1 ml, p.o.) effectively protected against gastric mucosal injury induced by subsequent instillation of 70% or 96% ethanol (1 ml, p.o.).
Oral administration of indomethacin (1.25–20 mg kg−1) dose-dependently counteracted the protective effect of 20% ethanol (ID50: 3.5 mg kg−1).
Likewise, NS-398 (0.1–1 mg kg−1), L-745,337 (0.2–2 mg kg−1) and DFU (0.02–0.2 mg kg−1) inhibited the protective effect of 20% ethanol in a dose-dependent manner with ID50 values of 0.3 mg kg−1, 0.4 mg kg−1 and 0.06 mg kg−1, respectively.
Inhibition of mild irritant-induced protection was also found when NS-398 (1 mg kg−1) was administered s.c. or when 96% ethanol was used to damage the mucosa.
Pretreatment with 16,16-dimethyl-prostaglandin (PG)E2 at 4 ng kg−1, a dose that did not protect against ethanol (70%)-induced mucosal damage when given alone, completely reversed the effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitors on the mild irritant-induced protection.
Pretreatment with dexamethasone (3 mg kg−1, 24 and 2 h before instillation of 20% ethanol) did not affect the protective activity of the mild irritant, indicating that enzyme induction is not involved.
Indomethacin (20 mg kg−1, p.o.) did not prevent the protection conferred by sodium salicylate (100 mg kg−1), dimercaprol (30 μg kg−1), iodoacetamide (50 mg kg−1) and lithium (20 mg kg−1). Likewise, the protective effect of these agents was not counteracted by NS-398 (1 mg kg−1, p.o.).
Whereas indomethacin (20 mg kg−1, p.o.) near-maximally inhibited gastric mucosal formation of PGE2, 6-keto-PGF1α and thromboxane (TX) B2 as well as platelet TXB2 release, the selective COX-2 inhibitors were ineffective.
The findings show that selective COX-2 inhibitors, although lacking in ulcerogenic activity, prevent the protection conferred by a mild irritant. Prostaglandis generated by a constitutive COX-2 could thus contribute to physiological functions involved in gastric homeostasis, although at present a non-COX-2-related mechanism underlying the effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitors tested on mild irritant-induced protection cannot be completely excluded.
Keywords: Cyclo-oxygenase-1; cyclo-oxygenase-2; gastroprotection; mild irritant; NS-398; L-745,337; DFU; prostaglandins; thromboxane
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (352.2 KB).