Abstract
We confirmed that endothelium-independent contraction of the rabbit pulmonary artery (RPA) is mediated through both an endothelin A (ETAR) and endothelin B (ETB2R) receptor.
The response of endothelium-denuded RPA rings to endothelin-1 (ET-1, pD2=7.84±0.03) was only partially inhibited by BQ123 (10 μM), an ETAR antagonist.
Pretreatment with 1 nM sarafotoxin S6c (S6c), an ETBR agonist, desensitized the ETB2R and significantly attenuated the response to ET-3 (pD2=7.40±0.02 before, <6.50 after S6c).
Pretreatment with S6c had little effect on the response to ET-1, but BQ123 (10 μM) caused a parallel shift to the right of the residual ETAR-mediated response to ET-1 (pD2=7.84±0.03 before S6c, 7.93±0.03 after S6c, 6.81±0.05 after BQ123).
Binding of radiolabelled ET-1 to early passage cultures of RPA vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) displayed two patterns of competitive displacement characteristic of the ETAR (BQ123 pIC50=8.73±0.05) or ETB2R (S6c pIC50=10.15).
Competitive displacement experiments using membranes from late passage VSMC confirmed only the presence of the ETAR (ET-1 pIC50=9.3, BQ123 pIC50=8.0, S6c pIC50<6.0).
The ETAR was functionally active and coupled to rises in intracellular calcium which exhibited prolonged homologous desensitization.
Using a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for the rabbit ETB2R, we demonstrated the absence of mRNA expression in phenotypically modified VSMC.
We conclude that the ETB2R expressed by VSMC which mediates contraction of RPA is rapidly down-regulated at the transcriptional level during phenotypic modulation in vitro.
Keywords: endothelin receptor, pulmonary artery, vascular smooth muscle, phenotypic modulation, intracellular calcium, mRNA
Introduction
Three distinct endothelin receptors (ETR) have been sequenced and characterized (Bax & Saxena, 1994). The ETAR has greater affinity for endothelin-1 (ET-1) than ET-3, whereas the ETBR has similar affinity for all ET isoforms and sarafotoxin S6c (S6c). A receptor with highest affinity for ET-3, the ETCR, has been identified in Xenopus laevis (Karne et al., 1993) and a response with similar ligand specificity has been described in rabbit saphenous vein (Douglas et al., 1995). On the basis of functional assays and ligand selectivity, subtypes of ETBRs have been described. The ETB1R on endothelial cells mediates endothelium-dependent relaxation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) while the ETB2R on VSMC mediates contraction (Warner et al., 1993). Rabbit pulmonary artery (RPA) preparations were among the first described examples of ETB2R-mediated vasoconstriction (Fukuroda et al., 1994; La Douceur et al., 1993; Panek et al., 1992; Warner et al., 1993) but others have also been identified (Lodge & Halaka, 1993; Moreland et al., 1992; Shetty et al., 1993; Sudjarwo et al., 1994; Webb et al., 1993). Whilst BQ788 antagonizes effects attributable to both B receptor subtypes (Ishikawa et al., 1994) the antagonists PD142893 and IRL 1038 have been used to discriminate between them (Sudjarwo et al., 1994; Warner et al., 1993).
The structural basis for the pharmacological differences between ETBR subtypes is uncertain. All of the sequenced ETRs are members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and low stringency screening has failed to identify multiple genes. The interpretation of standard pharmacological assays is complicated by ‘cross-talk' between different receptors in preparations where both the ETAR and ETB2R are expressed (Clozel & Gray, 1995). Post-translational modifications or alternative mRNA splicing could account for different ligand binding characteristics. However, the only reported splice variant of the ETBR does not affect the coding region (Cheng et al., 1993) and the binding characteristics of alternatively spliced ETAR products have not yet been reported (Miyamoto et al., 1996). The inferred protein sequence of a putative human ETB2R was not significantly different from that of the human endothelial ETB1R (Webb et al., 1995). However, a recent study using the endothelin B receptor gene knockout mouse suggests that both ETB1R- and ETB2R-mediated contractions may be due to ETB receptors derived from the same gene (Mizuguchi et al., 1997).
Many studies of second messenger systems have been performed using cell lines, including those stably transfected with cloned receptors. Although facilitating biochemical characterization of the responses, they need not have a bearing on the behaviour of normal cells, many of which express more than one receptor (including RPA VSMC). While the events in contractile cells which are coupled to signalling through the ETAR are relatively well described, particularly calcium transients (Pollock et al., 1995), those activated through the ETBR have not been well characterized. In attempting to identify second messenger systems coupled to ETRs on normal VSMC from the RPA and the nature of ‘cross-talk' between them, we have confirmed that both the ETB2R and ETAR mediate RPA contraction. We have shown that the ETAR expressed in both early and late passage cells is functional and that ligand binding stimulates a rise in intracellular calcium. However, during phenotypic modulation of VSMC early in culture (Campbell et al., 1988), expression of ETB2R mRNA is rapidly down-regulated, leading to the loss of ETB2R expression at the cell membrane. We have correlated the down-regulation of the ETB2R with that of smooth muscle high molecular weight caldesmon, a marker of the contractile phenotype (Birukov et al., 1993; Kashiwada et al., 1997).
Methods
Animals
Main pulmonary arteries were obtained from heparinized (500 U, i.v. male and female New Zealand White rabbits (<1.5 kg) after Nembutal anaesthesia (120 mg pentobarbitone Na, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sydney) according to a protocol approved by the Garvan/St. Vincent's Hospital Animal Experimentation and Ethics Committee.
Organ bath experiments
Endothelium was removed by gentle rubbing of the luminal surface with a wooden swab stick. Rings (2 mm) were suspended at 37°C in 10 ml jacketed organ baths containing freshly prepared Krebs-bicarbonate solution (in mM) NaCl 118, KCl 4.7, KH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4.7H2O 1.18, glucose 5, NaHCO3 25, CaCl2.2H2O 2.54) continuously gassed with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. The basal tension was 2.00±0.05 g and isometric tension was measured using Grass FT03 force transducers (Quincy, MA, U.S.A.) coupled to a MacLab data acquisition system (Analog Digital Instruments, Sydney, Australia). In cumulative concentration-response experiments, drugs were administered sequentially after the tension had stabilized (⩾2 min). In some experiments rings were pretreated with 1 nM S6c, an ETBR-selective agonist, for 30 min prior to the concentration-response protocols.
Tissue culture
VSMC from RPA were obtained from vessels which were washed several times in Hanks balanced salt solution (GIBCO, Life Technologies, Melbourne) and incubated in 1000 u ml−1 collagenase type II (Sigma Chemical Co, Sydney) for 30 min at 37°C to remove endothelium. Strips of vessel wall media were peeled off using watchmakers' forceps, diced and incubated in a solution containing collagenase and 60 u ml−1 porcine pancreatic elastase (Calbiochem-Novabiochem, Sydney) for 2–3 h at 37°C with periodic pipetting. Either the tissue explants or dispersed cells were seeded in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with penicillin (100 u ml−1), streptomycin (100 μg ml−1), fresh L-glutamine (4 mM, all from GIBCO) and 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, PA Biologicals, Sydney). Cultured cells expressed smooth muscle actin but not Factor VIII:RAg, an endothelial cell marker, using an indirect immunofluorescence assay.
Expression of high molecular weight caldesmon
At subculture between passages 2–4, a small portion of cells from the main culture batch were seeded into 8-well chamber slides (Nunc, Medos, Sydney). The cells were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed for 10 min in 3% formaldehyde/0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS. After three washes in PBS, the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Rohm & Haas) in PBS for 30 min. After a further three washes with PBS, mouse monoclonal anti-high molecular weight caldesmon (clone hCD, Sigma Australia) was applied to the cells for 30 min at room temperature in 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma Australia) in PBS. Antibody binding was detected using FITC-rabbit anti-mouse antibody (Silenus Laboratories, Hawthorn, Australia) for 30 min at room temperature in 0.1% BSA/PBS. Slides were mounted in glycerol containing 1 mg ml−1 paraphenylenediamine (BDH Sydney) and fluorescence visualized using a laser confocal microscope (Molecular Dynamics, Melbourne, Australia).
Whole cell binding assays
Passage 2 cells were seeded into 24-well plates (Corning, Sydney) at 4×104 cells well−1 and cultured to confluence (6–8×104 cells well−1). The cells were washed twice with binding buffer (phosphate-buffered saline containing CaCl2 1 mM, MgCl2 0.5 mM and 0.1% BSA) at 30°C (Serradeil-Le Gal et al., 1991). Wells were incubated at 22°C with 1 ml binding buffer containing 10 pM [125I]-ET-1 (Amersham, Sydney)±unlabelled ET-1, BQ123, S6c or an unrelated control hexapeptide of sequence GRGESP (all American Peptide Co, Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A.). Non-cell-associated (free) counts were determined in the aspirated supernatant which was pooled with two 1 ml washes of binding buffer. Cell associated (bound) counts were determined following solubilization of the cells with two 0.5 ml aliquots of NaOH (0.5 M). Tubes were counted for 1 min in a Packard Cobra Auto Gamma counter (Meriden, CT, U.S.A.).
Membrane preparation and binding assays
Passage 6–8 cells in 150-cm2 flasks were rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and scraped from the flask. After two further washes the cell pellet was lysed with HEPES (5 mM) lysis buffer (5×108 cells 20 ml−1) according to published protocols (Lagny-Pourmir et al., 1989; Servin et al., 1987). The lysate was pelleted at 24,500×g for 15 min at 4°C in a Heraeus Sepatech Supafuge (Osterode, Germany) with a HFA20.16 fixed angle rotor. The pellets were resuspended at a cell equivalent concentration of 2×107 ml−1 in RBM buffer (Servin et al., 1987) containing (in mM) Tris HCL (pH 7.5) 50, NaCl 100, MgCl2 5, EDTA 1; bacitracin 100 μg ml−1, leupeptin 10 μg ml−1 (both Calbiochem, Sydney) and phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (100 μM) (Sigma). The crude receptor preparations were then gently syringed with a 23 gauge needle and stored at −70°C in 50 μl aliquots for up to 1 week. Aliquots were thawed and sonicated on ice using a Branson Sonifier 250 (6×10 s cycles at 50% power setting). Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Pierce, Lab Supply, Sydney). After the optimum protein concentration had been defined, competitive receptor binding assays were performed according to published protocols (Servin et al., 1987). In a final volume made up to 200 μl with KRB buffer (see below), membrane protein was added to 15 μl [125I]-ET-1 (final concentration 30 pM) and 20 μl of 10 fold dilutions (range 10−6–10−12 M final concentration) of unlabelled competitors ET-1, ET-3, BQ123 and sarafotoxin 6c or control hexapeptide GRGESP (American Peptide Co.). Ligands were diluted in KRB buffer (in mM) (NaCl 68, KCl 2.4, MgSO4.7H2O 0.6, KH2PO4 0.6, NaHCO3 2.5, glucose 2.8, HEPES 10, CaCl2 1, 0.2% BSA, 1 mg ml−1 bacitracin (Boehringer Mannheim, Sydney), pH 7.4) in Eppendorf microfuge tubes. The tubes were incubated for 2 h in a 37°C waterbath, after which each incubation mix was underlaid with 500 μl FBS using a 1 ml tuberculin syringe fitted with a 25G needle. The tubes were spun for 10 min at 13,000×g at 4°C to separate receptor-bound radioactivity in the pellet from unbound radioactivity in the supernatant. The supernatants were aspirated and kept for counting the unbound radioactivity, and the tips of the tubes containing the pellets were cut off for counting the bound radioactivity. Results were expressed as percentage bound/control as a function of ligand concentration.
Intracellular calcium assays
At least 3 days before intracellular calcium assays, passage 2–3 cells (2×105/well) were plated onto glass coverslips and serum-deprived for 24 h in DMEM containing 4% Monomed (Commonwealth Serum Laboratories, Melbourne). They were incubated for 30 min with Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (5 μM) (Fura-2 AM; stock solution 1 mM in dimethyl sulphoxide; Molecular Probes, BioScientific, Sydney) in 4% Monomed and washed twice in perfusion solution (in mM) NaCL 145, KCl 5, HEPES 10, MgCl2 1.2, CaCl2 1 and 0.1% bovine serum albumin; pH 7.45). The loaded cells were mounted on the stage of a Nikon Diaphot microscope, modified for microfluorescence studies as previously described (Gibb et al., 1994) and superfused with perfusion solution at 37°C using a peristaltic pump (Ismatech, Extech Equipment, Melbourne). The ratio of fluorescence emission at 510 nm by Fura-2 at excitation wavelengths of 340 nm and 380 nm were used to measure [Ca2+]i as previously described (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985):
![]() |
where K=224 nM (Fura-2 at 37°C); Rmin=ratio value in Ca2+ free conditions; Rmax=ratio value at a maximal Ca2+ concentration; Sf2=380 nm reading in low Ca2+ conditions (corrected for background) and Sb2=380 nm reading in high Ca2+ conditions (corrected for background). Rmin and Sf2 were determined at the end of an experiment by perfusing the cells with Ca2+-free perfusion solution containing EGTA (5 mM, Calbiochem) and a divalent cation ionophore, ionomycin (2 μM, Calbiochem). Rmax and Sb2 were then determined by the addition of CaCl2 (5 mM) in ionophore-containing perfusion solution.
Ligands and inhibitors
Stock solutions of human ET-1, human ET-3, BQ123, S6c (all American Peptide Co.), adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP, disodium salt) and uridine 5′-triphosphate (UTP, monosodium salt, both from Sigma) were stored at −20°C. For organ bath experiments, drugs were freshly diluted in Krebs bicarbonate solution and for intracellular calcium experiments in perfusion solution.
Data analysis
Organ bath results from at least four experiments are presented as means±s.e.mean. Graphs were obtained by fitting the results to a four parameter logistic function (SigmaPlot, Jandel Corporation, San Rafael, CA, U.S.A.). The IC50 from binding experiments was calculated using the Inplot program (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.).
cDNA preparation
RNA from RPA (four rabbit donors) and cultured VSMC derived from the same RPA (primary through to passage 4 cells) was prepared according to standard procedures (Chomczynski & Sacchi, 1987). RNA pellets were resuspended in 50 μl diethylpyrocarbonate (Sigma)-treated water. cDNA was prepared from 2 μg RNA in a 50 μl reaction volume containing dNTPs (0.25 mM each, Boehringer Mannheim), 200 ng oligo(dT), 4 U AMV reverse transcriptase and 2 U RNasin (all Promega, Sydney).
Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR)
The rabbit ETBR was cloned from a rabbit lung cDNA library screened with a PCR product derived from RPA VSMC using human primers (N. Yang et al., in preparation). Specific primers based on the rabbit DNA sequence (forward 5′-ACTGGCCATTTGGAGCTGAGAT and reverse 5′-TTGCATTCCACTCTTCTTTCTTAA) were used to amplify a 430 base pair product, which spans an intron, from cDNA prepared from each RPA and cultured VSMC cells at each passage derived from the same RPA. Rabbit GAPDH was used as a control (forward 5′-GATGCTGGTGCCGAGTACGTGG and reverse 5′-TCAGCAACGCATCCTGCACCAC) for the integrity of the cDNA preparation. Reactions (50 μl) were performed using 5 μl cDNA, dNTPs (0.25 mM), Mg2+ for GAPDH (1.5 mM), or Mg2+ for ETBR (2.5 mM and 1–2 U Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). The cycle conditions for ETBR were: 95°C, 3 min; 57°C, 30 s, 75°C, 30 s, for 1 cycle; 95°C, 1 min; 57°C, 30 s; 75°C, 30 s for 28 cycles; 95°C, 1 min; 57°C, 30 s; 75°C, 7 min for 1 cycle final extension. The cycle conditions for GAPDH were 95°C, 1 min; 62°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s for 1 cycle; 95°C, 30 s; 62°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s for 32 cycles; 95°C, 30 s; 62°C, 30 s; 72°C, 5 min for 1 cycle final extension. RT–PCR products were run on 1.8% agarose gels (Amresco, Astral Scientific, Sydney) in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization under UV light. Gels were photographed using a Polaroid MP-4 camera and type 665 film.
Results
ET-mediated contraction of rabbit pulmonary artery
Cumulative concentration-response experiments using ET-1 and ET-3, the latter being relatively selective for the ETBR, confirmed that they both stimulated endothelium-independent contraction via ETAR or ETBR (ET-1 pD2=7.84±0.03, n=8; ET-3 pD2=7.4±0.02, n=9, Figure 1A). Pretreatment of endothelium-denuded rings with the ETBR-selective agonist S6c (1 nM) abolished the contractile response to ET-3 (pD2<6.50, n=3, Figure 1B). However, pretreatment with S6c had no effect on the response subsequently induced by ET-1 (pD2=7.93±0.03 after S6c, n=4, Figure 1B). The dose-response curve to ET-1 was bi-sigmoidal in the presence of the ETAR-specific antagonist BQ123 ((Ihara et al., 1992); Figure 1A, n=8), suggesting that the contractile response to ET-1 was mediated via activation of both ETAR and ETB2R. A parallel shift to the right of the response to ET-1 in the presence of BQ123 followed desensitization with S6c (pD2=6.81±0.05, n=4, Figure 1B), indicating a pure ETAR-mediated response.
Figure 1.

Contraction of endothelium-denuded RPA rings with increasing concentrations of (A) ET-1 (n=8), ET-3 (n=9) and ET-1+10 μM BQ123 (n=8), and (B) ET-1 (n=4), ET-3 (n=3) and ET-1+10 μM BQ123 (n=4) after pretreatment with S6c.
Expression of high molecular weight caldesmon
Due to the small numbers of cells available at early passages, RPA VSMC were not examined immunohistochemically until passage 2 (Figure 2). At this stage, approximately 30% of cells stained positively for high molecular weight caldesmon, the staining being associated with cytoplasmic filaments running the length of the cells (Figure 2A). Thus, by passage 2, most of these cells had down-regulated their expression of high molecular weight caldesmon. In passage 3 and 4 cells (Figure 2B and C, respectively), caldesmon staining was localized around the nuclei, with little cytoplasmic staining present.
Figure 2.

Expression of high molecular weight caldesmon. (A) Caldesmon immunofluorescence is associated with cytoplasmic filaments. Only 30% of cells exhibit positive staining at passage 2. Caldesmon expression is only perinuclear at passages 3 and 4 (arrows, B and C, respectively). Note that the perinuclear staining in the passage 4 cells extends slightly into the extended pseudopodia (arrows). Scale bar=10 μm.
Down-regulation of ETB2R expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells
Small scale binding studies were used to identify the receptors expressed on low numbers of early passage adherent cells. Binding of radio-iodinated ET-1 increased over 1.5–2 h and was specifically inhibited by unlabelled ET-1 (results not shown). Competition binding studies were performed using ET-1 and the ETAR-selective ligands, BQ123 and S6c respectively. Representative experiments are shown in Figure 3 and the results of six experiments are summarized in Table 1. Individual cultures from single rabbits displayed two patterns of binding which were typical of either the ETAR or ETBR (Figure 3). Figure 3A illustrates competitive displacement by ET-1 (pIC50=10.2) and BQ123 (pIC50=8.7) but not S6c (pIC50<6.0) while Figure 3B illustrates competitive displacement by ET-1 (pIC50=10.4) and S6c (pIC50=8.6) but not BQ123 (pIC50<6.0). In experiments demonstrating ETAR binding (n=4, preparations 2 and 4–6, Table 1) the mean pIC50 for BQ123 was 8.73±0.05, while in experiments demonstrating ETBR binding (n=2, preparations 1 and 3, Table 1) the mean pIC50 for S6c was 10.15 (n=2). The mean pIC50s for ET-1 were 9.95±0.25 and 10.25 respectively.
Figure 3.

Inhibition of [125I]-ET-1 binding to whole, early passage VSMC in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabelled ET-1, BQ123, or S6c. Representative experiments are illustrated which demonstrate binding typical of the ETAR (A) and ETBR (B).
Table 1.
Competitive displacement of [125I]-ET-1 (10 pM) by unlabelled ligands in six early passage whole cell binding experiments

ETAR expression in late passage vascular smooth muscle cells
Given the small number of cells obtained from a single rabbit, we were unable to follow the pattern of binding sequentially in cultured cells derived from the same animal. However, there were sufficient cells from late passages (6–8) to obtain satisfactory membrane preparations for competitive binding studies (n=3). These cells were clearly ‘synthetic' as judged by their morphological characteristics (transition from spindle-shaped to polygonal cells, cellular hypertrophy) and decreased expression of high molecular weight caldesmon isoforms by immunofluorescence. These binding studies demonstrated concentration-dependent inhibition of radiolabelled ET-1 binding by unlabelled ET-1 (pIC50=9.3) and BQ123 (pIC50=8.0) but not S6c (Figure 4). This was consistent with the binding characteristics of an ETAR. Thus phenotypic modulation of RPA SMC is associated with down-regulation of ETB2R ligand binding.
Figure 4.

Inhibition of [125I]-ET-1 (30 pM) binding to late passage (P6) VSMC membranes (n=3) by increasing concentrations of unlabelled ET-1, and BQ123 but not S6c.
ETAR-mediated [Ca2+]i responses in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells
In passage 2 and 3 cultured cells ET-1 (200 nM) induced a typical biphasic rise in [Ca2+]i (Figure 5A). The resting [Ca2+]i in RPA VSMC was 60–100 nM with a peak response up to ∼500 nM. Oscillations with a periodicity of ∼3 min were occasionally observed, particularly in cultures approaching confluence (data not shown). In keeping with the binding studies which suggested that the ETAR was the predominant receptor expressed by cultured RPA VSMC, the ETBR-selective agonists S6c and ET-3 failed to induce a significant rise in [Ca2+]i (Figure 5B). Whereas the ET-1 response demonstrated homologous desensitization, the responses to P2Y purinoceptor agonists (ATP and UTP) were unaffected by pre-exposure to ET-1 (Figure 5A and B, respectively). We have shown previously that the P2Y2 receptor on RPA does not demonstrate homologous desensitization (Qasabian et al., 1997). The [Ca2+]i response to 200 nM ET-1 was completely abolished by pretreatment and co-perfusion with 1 μM BQ123 (Figure 6). This confirms that the ET-1 induced rise in [Ca2+]i is mediated through the ETAR. There was no significant difference in the responses of early versus late passage cells (data not shown).
Figure 5.

Homologous desensitization of the intracellular calcium response in passages 2 and 3 RPA VSMC to ET-1 (A,B) and no response to the ETBR-selective agonists, S6c and ET-3 (B). Responses to the P2 purinoceptor agonists ATP and UTP were unaffected by previous exposure to 200 nM ET-1.
Figure 6.

Abolition of the intracellular calcium response in passage 2 and 3 RPA VSMC to ET-1 (200 nM) following preincubation and co-perfusion with the ETAR-selective antagonist, BQ123 (1 μM).
Mechanism of ETBR down-regulation during phenotypic modulation
A reverse transcriptase-PCR assay was developed to examine mRNA expression on small numbers of cells using primers designed from the sequence of the cloned RPA ETBR (N. Yang et al., in preparation). In preliminary experiments we demonstrated that there was no significant contamination with genomic DNA and that the exponential phase of the reaction extended to 30–35 cycles. We examined ETBR expression in RPA from four rabbits and series of cultured VSMC derived from these. ETBR mRNA was present in RNA prepared from RPA, and rabbit lung (used as positive control) but was not detected in cultured VSMC (primary culture through to 4th passage) derived from the RPA (Figure 7). GAPDH PCR confirmed the integrity of the cDNA in these samples. Down-regulation of the ETBR during phenotypic modulation thus appears to be at the level of mRNA transcription.
Figure 7.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions for rabbit ETBR (upper panel) and GAPDH (lower panel) using RPA (n=4) and derived VSMC. Lane 1: RPA; lane 2: primary cultured VSMC; lanes 3–6: passages 1–4 of VSMC; lane 7: negative control; lane 8: positive control.
Discussion
In this paper we describe several series of experiments which provide evidence for the rapid transcriptional down-regulation of the ETB2R and its functional consequences upon initiation of in vitro culture of RPA VSMC. By several overlapping lines of evidence we show that: (i) both ETAR and ETB2R are present and functional in intact RPA (organ bath studies, RT–PCR); (ii) ETB2R is present in a minority of early passage (passage 2) RPA VSMC cultures (ligand binding) and (iii) ETB2R is absent in late passage (passage 6, synthetic) cultured RPA VSMC (ligand binding, RT–PCR). This represents a spectrum of ETB2R expression, ranging from its functional presence in VSMC of the contractile phenotype, to its absence in synthetic or proliferative VSMC. Given that significant differences between similar rabbit vascular preparations have been reported in different laboratories (Douglas et al., 1995; Gray et al., 1994), it was important for us to confirm the characteristics of ETAR- and ETBR-mediated contraction of the RPA. The maximum tension generated by ET-1, a non-selective agonist, was similar whether or not the ETBR had been desensitized by prior exposure to S6c (Figure 1). Blockade and/or desensitization of both receptors was necessary to block the action of ET-1 in the RPA. Similar functional responses to ET-1-induced contraction have been reported in rat trachea which is also known to express both ETAR and ETBR (Clozel & Gray, 1995; Henry, 1993). Activation of either receptor in the RPA produces a similar contractile response, which is compatible with a model of receptor ‘cross-talk' (Clozel & Gray, 1995).
In attempting to define the second messenger system(s) coupled to the ETBR, we found that the ETAR mediated increases in [Ca2+]i in cultured cells at passage 2 and 3. Whereas ETBR ligand binding patterns were observed in 2/6 membrane preparations from passage 2 cultured cells, neither of the ETBR-selective agonists S6c nor ET-3 elevated [Ca2+]i in Fura-2 loaded cells from early or late passage indicating that the ETBR was rapidly down-regulated. Previous binding studies on RPA membrane preparations have estimated the proportions of ETBR and ETAR to be 60 : 40 (La Douceur et al., 1993) or 77 : 23 (Fukuroda et al., 1994). Since both the ETAR and ETBR are biochemically and functionally demonstrable on the RPA, this implied that in cultured VSMC either the ETB2R was not coupled to [Ca2+]i responses or that it was down-regulated in vitro. Therefore we systematically examined its expression in vitro using small scale binding assays and microfluorescence techniques in order to study individual animals. Although we did demonstrate the predominant expression of the ETB2R in binding experiments in some cultures of early passage RPA VSMC, the majority demonstrated competition binding typical of an ETAR. These differences arose despite careful control of assay conditions. We never saw a mixed pattern of ET receptor responses and we inferred that there must have been a relatively rapid down-regulation of ETBR expression during early culture. In keeping with this, membrane preparations from later passage cells whose phenotype had clearly become synthetic only expressed ETAR. Although data from the RT–PCR indicated that ETBR transcription was rapidly down-regulated after initiation of in vitro culture, we attributed the presence of the ETBR in some of the early passage binding studies to the persistence or slow turnover of the ETBR at the cell surface in the absence of transcription.
Two previous studies have addressed changes in ET receptor expression in cultured VSMC. Contractile rabbit aortic VSMC express a high affinity ETAR which is down-regulated in parallel with phenotypic modulation, but differences in the expression of receptor subtype as found in this study were not identified (Serradeil-Le Gal et al., 1991). Cultured rat aortic VSMC express predominantly the ETAR during passages 10–15, but later passage cells (>30) expressed both the ETAR and ETBR (Eguchi et al., 1994). However, phenotypic modulation of VSMC occurs within days, rather than weeks of culture (Campbell et al., 1988). Therefore, these observations on late passage cells are unlikely to be relevant to the process of phenotypic modulation.
Because the ETB2R is down-regulated rapidly in culture, we have not been able to study the second messenger system(s) to which it is coupled. However, we have shown that the ETAR is coupled to intracellular calcium transients (Pollock et al., 1995). The rise in [Ca2+]i seen in response to ET-1 would be sufficient to activate intracellular calcium-dependent protein kinases and calmodulin. The ETAR characteristically demonstrated rapid and prolonged homologous desensitization, the mechanism of which probably involves receptor phosphorylation (Cyr et al., 1993). In this study, the mechanism of ETB2R down-regulation in vitro occurs at the transcriptional level, and in parallel with VSMC phenotypic modulation, suggesting the existence of a local factor maintaining expression of ETBR in vivo. This phenomenon is distinct from the well-described process of agonist-mediated down-regulation of G protein linked receptors modelled by other groups using β-adrenergic receptors (Karoor et al., 1996), and resembles the phenotype-related alteration of atrial natriuretic peptide receptor expression in rat aortic SMC (Suga et al., 1992). In this study we made no attempts to re-induce the contractile phenotype in these cells through manipulation of culture conditions in order to maintain expression of the ETB2R.
Phenotypic modulation of VSMC in vitro from the ‘contractile' to the ‘synthetic' phenotype is thought to reflect the changes seen in certain pathophysiological states, such as atherosclerosis and vascular remodelling. However, experimental evidence concerning the role of ETR subtypes in these conditions is scant and conflicting. Winkles et al. (1993) found that ETBR mRNA was down-regulated in 6/7 human aortic atherosclerotic plaque specimens compared to normal aortas, however the authors acknowledged that the cell types involved were not known. In contrast, Dagassan et al. (1996) found that ETBR were up-regulated in human atherosclerotic coronary arteries, but again, no cell type was implicated in this up-regulation. Bacon et al. (1995) found that ETBR was expressed only in areas of neovascularization in human atherosclerotic coronary arteries, co-localizing with von Willebrand factor staining, suggesting that ETBR expression was found only on endothelial cells. The increase in pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with pulmonary hypertension (Wagenvoort & Mooi, 1989) and in animal models of the disease is associated with structural changes in the resistance vessels. Phenotypic modulation of the VSMC and their migration into the intima contribute to luminal narrowing in pulmonary hypertension and local production of ET-1 may play a role in this process (Giaid et al., 1993; Stewart et al., 1991). Given the potential therapeutic applications of selective ET receptor antagonists in such conditions, it is important to recognize that the target receptor may be different from that expressed in normal cells. The identification of factors which regulate ETBR expression in this system should facilitate further studies on the interaction between the ETRs.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Scleroderma Association of New South Wales to D.J.W. We are grateful to Terry Campbell and his group at St Vincent's Hospital for assistance with the animals; Peter French, Centre for Immunology for assistance with confocal microscopy; Lucinda Wallman and Nan Yang, Centre for Immunology for advice and assistance with RT-PCR; Tina Iismaa, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Jan Wanstall, University of Queensland, for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ET
endothelin
- ETR
endothelin receptor
- FBS
foetal bovine serum
- GRGESP
Gly-Arg-Gly-Glu-Ser-Pro hexapeptide
- RPA
rabbit pulmonary artery
- S6c
sarafotoxin 6c
- VSMC
vascular smooth muscle cells
References
- BACON C., CARY N., DAVENPORT A. Distribution of endothelin receptors in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1995;26 Suppl. 3:S439–S441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BAX W., SAXENA P. The current endothelin receptor classification: time for reconsideration. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1994;15:379–386. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(94)90159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BIRUKOV K., FRID M., ROGERS J., SHIRINSKY V., KOTELIANSKY J., CAMPBELL J., CAMPBELL G. Synthesis and expression of smooth muscle phenotypic markers in primary cultures of rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells: influence of seeding density and media and relation to cell contractility. Exp. Cell. Res. 1993;204:46–53. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CAMPBELL G., CAMPBELL J., MANDERSON J., HORRIGAN S., RENNICK R. Arterial smooth muscle. A multifunctional mesenchymal cell. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1988;112:977–986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHENG H.F., SU Y.M., YEH J.R., CHANG K.J. Alternative transcript of the nonselective-type endothelin receptor from rat brain. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993;44:533–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHOMCZYNSKI P., SACCHI N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 1987;162:156–159. doi: 10.1006/abio.1987.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CLOZEL M., GRAY G. Are there different ETB receptors mediating constriction and relaxation. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1995;26 Suppl. 3:S262–S264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CYR C.R., RUDY B., KRIS R.M. Prolonged desensitization of the human endothelin A receptor in Xenopus oocytes. Comparative studies with the human neurokinin A receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:26071–26074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DAGASSAN P.H., BREU V., CLOZEL M., KUNZLI A., VOGT P., TURINA M., KIOWSKI W., CLOZEL J.P. Up-regulation of endothelin-B receptors in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1996;27:147–153. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199601000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DOUGLAS S., BECK G., JR, ELLIOTT J., OHLSTEIN E. Pharmacological evidence for the presence of three distinct functional endothelin receptor subtypes in the rabbit lateral saphenous vein. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1995;114:1529–1540. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb14936.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EGUCHI S., HIRATA Y., IMAI T., KANNO K., MARUMO F. Phenotypic change of endothelin receptor subtype in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Endocrinology. 1994;134:222–228. doi: 10.1210/endo.134.1.8275937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FUKURODA T., KOBAYASHI M., OZAKI S., YANO M., MIYAUCHI M., ONIZUKA M., SUGISHITA Y., GOTO K., NISHIKIBE M. Endothelin receptor subtypes in human versus rabbit pulmonary arteries. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994;76:1976–1982. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.5.1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GIAID A., YANAGISAWA M., LANGLEBEN D., MICHEL R., LEVY R., SHENNIB H., KIMURA S., MASAKI T., DUGUID W., STEWART D. Expression of endothelin-1 in the lungs of patients with pulmonary hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328:1732–1739. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306173282402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GIBB C., COOK D., DELBRIDGE L., CONIGRAVE A. Pharmacological characterization of the nucleotide receptors that mobilize Ca2+ ions in human parathyroid cells. J. Endocrinol. 1994;142:277–283. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1420277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRAY G., LOEFFLER B.-M., CLOZEL M. Characterization of endothelin receptors mediating contraction of rabbit saphenous vein. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:H959–H966. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.3.H959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRYNKIEWICZ G., POENIE M., TSIEN R. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HENRY P. Endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced contraction in rat isolated trachea: involvement of ETA and ETB receptors and multiple signal transduction systems. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1993;110:435–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13829.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- IHARA M., NOGUCHI K., SAEKI T., FUKURODA T., TSUCHIDA S., KIMURA S., FUKAMI T., ISHIKAWA K., NISHIKIBE M., YANO M. Biological profiles of highly potent novel endothelin antagonists selective for the ETA receptor. Life Sci. 1992;50:247–255. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90331-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISHIKAWA K., IHARA M., NOGUCHI K., MASE T., MINO N., SAEKI T., FUKURODA T., FUKAMI T., OZAKI S., NAGASE T., NISHIKIBE M., YANO M. Biochemical and pharmacological profile of a potent and selective endothelin B-receptor antagonist, BQ-788. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994;91:4892–4896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KARNE S., JAYAWICKREME C., LERNER M. Cloning and characterization of an endothelin-3 specific receptor (ETc receptor) from Xenopus laevis dermal melanophores. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:19126–19133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KAROOR V., SHIH M., THOLANIKUNNEL B., MALBON C.C. Regulating expression and function of G-protein-linked receptors. Prog. Neurobiol. 1996;48:555–568. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(96)00004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KASHIWADA K., NISHIDA W., HAYASHI K., OZAWA K., YAMANAKA Y., SAGA H., YAMASHITA T., TOHYAMA M., SHIMADA S., SATO K., SOBUE K. Coordinate expression of alpha-tropomyosin and caldesmon isoforms in association with phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:15396–15404. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.24.15396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LA DOUCEUR D., FLYNN M., KEISER J., REYNOLDS E., HALEEN S. ETA and ETB receptors coexist on rabbit pulmonary artery vascular smooth muscle mediating contraction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;196:209–215. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LAGNY-POURMIR I., AMIRANOFF B., LORINET A., TATEMOTO K., LABURTHE M. Characterization of galanin receptors in the insulin-secreting cell line Rin m 5F: evidence for coupling with a pertussis toxin-sensitive guanosine triphosphate regulatory protein. Endocrinology. 1989;124:2635–2641. doi: 10.1210/endo-124-5-2635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LODGE N., HALAKA N. Endothelin receptor subtype(s) in rabbit jugular vein smooth muscle. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1993;22 Suppl.8:S140–S143. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199322008-00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MIYAMOTO Y., YOSHIMASA T., ARAI H., TAKAYA K., OGAWA Y., ITOH H, NAKAO K. Alternative RNA splicing of the human endothelin-A receptor generates multiple transcripts. Biochem. J. 1996;313:795–801. doi: 10.1042/bj3130795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MIZUGUCHI T., NISHIYAMA M., MOROI K., TANAKA H., SAITO T., MASUDA Y., MASAKI T., DE WIT D., YANAGISAWA M., KIMURA S. Analysis of two pharmacologically predicted endothelin B receptor subtypes by using the endothelin B receptor gene knockout mouse. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997;120:1427–1430. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MORELAND S., MCMULLEN D., DELANEY C., LEE V., HUNT J. Venous smooth muscle contains vasoconstrictor ETB-like receptors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992;184:100–106. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91163-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PANEK R., MAJOR T., HINGORANI G., DOHERTY A., TAYLOR D., RAPUNDALO S. Endothelin and structurally related analogs distinguish between endothelin receptor subtypes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992;183:566–571. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)90519-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- POLLOCK D.M., KEITH T.L., HIGHSMITH R.F. Endothelin receptors and calcium signaling. FASEB J. 1995;9:1196–1204. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.9.12.7672512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- QASABIAN R.A., SCHYVENS C., OWE-YOUNG R., KILLEN J.P., MACDONALD P.S., CONIGRAVE A.D., WILLIAMSON D.J. Characterization of the P-2 receptors in rabbit pulmonary artery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997;120:553–558. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SERRADEIL-LE GAL C., HERBERT J., GARCIA C., BOUTIN M., MAFFRAND J. Importance of the phenotypic state of vascular smooth muscle cells on the binding and mitogenic activity of endothelin. Peptides. 1991;12:575–579. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(91)90104-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SERVIN A., AMIRANOFF B., ROUYER-FESSARD C., TATEMOTO K., LABURTHE M. Identification and molecular characterization of galanin receptor sites in rat brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1987;144:298–304. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(87)80510-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHETTY S., OKADA T., WEBB R., DELGRANDE D., LAPPE R. Functionally distinct endothelin B receptors in vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;191:459–464. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STEWART D., LEVY R., CERNACEK P., LANGLEBEN D. Increased plasma endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension: marker or mediator of disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 1991;114:464–469. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-6-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SUDJARWO S., HORI M., TANAKA T., MATSUDA Y., OKADA T., KARAKI H. Subtypes of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors mediating venous smooth muscle contraction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994;200:627–633. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SUGA S., NAKAO K., KISHIMOTO I., HOSODA K., MUKOYAMA M., ARAI H., SHIRAKAMI G., OGAWA Y., KOMATSU Y., NAKAGAWA O., HAMA N., IMURA H. Phenotype-related alteration in expression of natriuretic peptide receptors in aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 1992;71:34–39. doi: 10.1161/01.res.71.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WAGENVOORT C., MOOI W.Biopsy pathology of the pulmonary vasculature Biopsy Pathology Series 1989London: Chapman & Hall; ed. Gottlieb, L., Neville, A. & Walker, F. [Google Scholar]
- WARNER T., ALLCOCK G., MICKLEY E., CORDER R., VANE J. Comparative studies with the endothelin receptor antagonists BQ-123 and PD 142893 indicate at least three endothelin receptors. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1993;22:S117–S120. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199322008-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEBB M., CHAO C.-C., RIZZO M., SHAPIRO R., NEUBAUER M., LIU E., AVERSA C., BRITTAIN R., TREIGER B. Cloning and expression of an endothelin receptor subtype B from human prostate that mediates contraction. Mol. Pharmacol. 1995;47:730–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WEBB M., LIU E., MONSHIZADEGAN H., CHAO C.-C., LYNCH J., FISHER S., ROSE P. Expression of endothelin receptor subtypes in rabbit saphenous vein. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993;44:959–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WINKLES J., ALBERTS G., BROGI E., LIBBY P. Endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor mRNA expression in normal and atherosclerotic human arteries. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;191:1081–1088. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

