Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1999 Jan;107(1):27–35. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9910727

Human health risk assessment in relation to environmental pollution of two artificial freshwater lakes in The Netherlands.

H J Albering 1, J P Rila 1, E J Moonen 1, J A Hoogewerff 1, J C Kleinjans 1
PMCID: PMC1566317  PMID: 9872714

Abstract

A human health risk assessment has been performed in relation to recreational activities on two artificial freshwater lakes along the river Meuse in The Netherlands. Although the discharges of contaminants into the river Meuse have been reduced in the last decades, which is reflected in decreasing concentrations of pollutants in surface water and suspended matter, the levels in sediments are more persistent. Sediments of the two freshwater lakes appear highly polluted and may pose a health risk in relation to recreational activities. To quantify health risks for carcinogenic (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) as well as noncarcinogenic compounds (e.g., heavy metals), an exposure assessment model was used. First, we used a standard model that solely uses data on sediment pollution as the input parameter, which is the standard procedure in sediment quality assessments in The Netherlands. The highest intake appeared to be associated with the consumption of contaminated fish and resulted in a health risk for Pb and Zn (hazard index exceeded 1). For the other heavy metals and for benzo(a)pyrene, the total averaged exposure levels were below levels of concern. Secondly, input data for a more location-specific calculation procedure were provided via analyses of samples from sediment, surface water, and suspended matter. When these data (concentrations in surface water) were taken into account, the risk due to consumption of contaminated fish decreased by more than two orders of magnitude and appeared to be negligible. In both exposure assessments, many assumptions were made that contribute to a major degree to the uncertainty of this risk assessment. However, this health risk evaluation is useful as a screening methodology for assessing the urgency of sediment remediation actions.

Full text

PDF
27

Images in this article

28Figure 1
on p.28
30Figure 2
on p.30
30Figure 3
on p.30

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Absil M. C., van Scheppingen Y. Concentrations of selected heavy metals in benthic diatoms and sediment in the Westerschelde estuary. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Jun;56(6):1008–1015. doi: 10.1007/s001289900145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birnbaum L. S., DeVito M. J. Use of toxic equivalency factors for risk assessment for dioxins and related compounds. Toxicology. 1995 Dec 28;105(2-3):391–401. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(95)03237-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brannon J. M., Price C. B., Reilly F. J., Jr, Pennington J. C., McFarland V. A. Effects of sediment organic carbon on distribution of radiolabeled fluoranthene and PCBs among sediment, interstitial water, and biota. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Dec;51(6):873–880. doi: 10.1007/BF00198284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Finley B., Proctor D., Scott P., Harrington N., Paustenbach D., Price P. Recommended distributions for exposure factors frequently used in health risk assessment. Risk Anal. 1994 Aug;14(4):533–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fiore B. J., Anderson H. A., Hanrahan L. P., Olson L. J., Sonzogni W. C. Sport fish consumption and body burden levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons: a study of Wisconsin anglers. Arch Environ Health. 1989 Mar-Apr;44(2):82–88. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1989.9934380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gümgüm B., Unlü E., Tez Z., Gülsün Z. Heavy metal pollution in water, sediment and fish from the Tigris river in Turkey. Chemosphere. 1994 Jul;29(1):111–116. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(94)90094-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawley J. K. Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil. Risk Anal. 1985 Dec;5(4):289–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hicks H. E. The Great Lakes: a historical overview. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996 May-Aug;12(3-4):303–313. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Linde A. R., Arribas P., Sanchez-Galan S., Garcia-Vazquez E. Eel (Anguilla anguilla) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) target species to assess the biological impact of trace metal pollution in freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Oct;31(3):297–302. doi: 10.1007/BF00212668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moody R. P., Chu I. Dermal exposure to environmental contaminants in the Great Lakes. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103 (Suppl 9):103–114. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s9103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nisbet I. C., LaGoy P. K. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;16(3):290–300. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paustenbach D. J., Jernigan J. D., Bass R., Kalmes R., Scott P. A proposed approach to regulating contaminated soil: identify safe concentrations for seven of the most frequently encountered exposure scenarios. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1992 Aug;16(1):21–56. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90020-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pellettieri M. B., Hallenbeck W. H., Brenniman G. R., Cailas M., Clark M. PCB intake from sport fishing along the northern Illinois shore of Lake Michigan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1996 Nov;57(5):766–770. doi: 10.1007/s001289900255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanders M. Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and surface sediment from two estuaries in South Carolina. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 May;28(4):397–405. doi: 10.1007/BF00211620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schilderman P. A., Hoogewerff J. A., van Schooten F. J., Maas L. M., Moonen E. J., van Os B. J., van Wijnen J. H., Kleinjans J. C. Possible relevance of pigeons as an indicator species for monitoring air pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Mar;105(3):322–330. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stone M., Droppo I. G. Distribution of lead, copper and zinc in size-fractionated river bed sediment in two agricultural catchments of southern Ontario, Canada. Environ Pollut. 1996;93(3):353–362. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00038-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tremblay N. W., Gilman A. P. Human health, the Great Lakes, and environmental pollution: a 1994 perspective. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103 (Suppl 9):3–5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vena J. E., Buck G. M., Kostyniak P., Mendola P., Fitzgerald E., Sever L., Freudenheim J., Greizerstein H., Zielezny M., McReynolds J. The New York Angler Cohort Study: exposure characterization and reproductive and developmental health. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996 May-Aug;12(3-4):327–334. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES