Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
editorial
. 1999 Dec;107(12):A594–A595. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107a594

The precautionary principle and scientific research are not antithetical.

B D Goldstein
PMCID: PMC1566805  PMID: 10585905

Abstract

The Precautionary Principle is intended to protect human health and the environment. To serve these goals effectively, precautionary action must be coupled with concurrent research to decide whether the action taken is in fact protective.

Full text

PDF
A594

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cap A. P. The chlorine controversy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1996;68(6):455–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00377869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis D. L., Axelrod D., Bailey L., Gaynor M., Sasco A. J. Rethinking breast cancer risk and the environment: the case for the precautionary principle. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Sep;106(9):523–529. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horton R. The new new public health of risk and radical engagement. Lancet. 1998 Jul 25;352(9124):251–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pugh D. M. The precautionary principle and science-based limits in regulatory toxicology: the human experience, individual protection. Arch Toxicol Suppl. 1997;19:147–154. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60682-3_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES