Abstract
Interspecies extrapolation in carcinogenesis is studied by evaluating prediction from rats to mice and from mice to rats. The Carcinogenic Potency Database, which includes 3500 cancer tests conducted in rats or mice on 955 compounds, is used for the analysis. About half of the chemicals tested for carcinogenicity are positive in at least one test, and this proportion is similar when rats and mice are considered separately. For 392 chemicals tested in both species, 76% of the rat carcinogens are positive in the mouse, and 70% of mouse carcinogens are positive in the rat. When compounds composed solely of chlorine, carbon, hydrogen, and, optionally, oxygen are excluded from the analysis, 75% of mouse carcinogens are positive in the rat. Overall concordance (the percentage positive in both species plus the percentage negative in both) is 76%. Three factors that affect prediction between rats and mice are discussed: chemical class, mutagenicity in the Salmonella assay, and the dose level at which a chemical is toxic. Prediction is more accurate for mutagens than non-mutagens and for substances that are toxic at low (versus only at high) doses. Species differences are not the result of failure in the bioassay to attain the maximum tolerated dose in the negative species or of more frequent testing in the positive species. An analysis of the predictive value of positivity for the 10 most common target sites indicates that most sites are good predictors of carcinogenicity at some site in the other species; the poorest predictors among these common sites are the rat urinary bladder and the mouse liver.
Full text
PDF








Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ames B. N., Magaw R., Gold L. S. Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards. Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):271–280. doi: 10.1126/science.3563506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernstein L., Gold L. S., Ames B. N., Pike M. C., Hoel D. G. Some tautologous aspects of the comparison of carcinogenic potency in rats and mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1985 Feb;5(1):79–86. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(85)90051-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chu K. C., Cueto C., Jr, Ward J. M. Factors in the evaluation of 200 National Cancer Institute carcinogen bioassays. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1981 Jul-Aug;8(1-2):251–280. doi: 10.1080/15287398109530068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Carlo F. J., Fung V. A. Summary of carcinogenicity data generated by the National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program. Drug Metab Rev. 1984;15(5-6):1251–1273. doi: 10.3109/03602538409033563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold L. S., Sawyer C. B., Magaw R., Backman G. M., de Veciana M., Levinson R., Hooper N. K., Havender W. R., Bernstein L., Peto R. A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays. Environ Health Perspect. 1984 Dec;58:9–319. doi: 10.1289/ehp.84589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold L. S., Slone T. H., Backman G. M., Magaw R., Da Costa M., Lopipero P., Blumenthal M., Ames B. N. Second chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1984 and by the National Toxicology Program through May 1986. Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Oct;74:237–329. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8774237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold L. S., Wright C., Bernstein L., deVeciana M. Reproducibility of results in "near-replicate" carcinogenesis bioassays. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jun;78(6):1149–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold L. S., de Veciana M., Backman G. M., Magaw R., Lopipero P., Smith M., Blumenthal M., Levinson R., Bernstein L., Ames B. N. Chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1982. Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Aug;67:161–200. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8667161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haseman J. K., Crawford D. D., Huff J. E., Boorman G. A., McConnell E. E. Results from 86 two-year carcinogenicity studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1984;14(5-6):621–639. doi: 10.1080/15287398409530613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haseman J. K., Huff J. E. Species correlation in long-term carcinogenicity studies. Cancer Lett. 1987 Oct 30;37(2):125–132. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(87)90154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haseman J. K., Huff J. E., Zeiger E., McConnell E. E. Comparative results of 327 chemical carcinogenicity studies. Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Oct;74:229–235. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8774229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Innes J. R., Ulland B. M., Valerio M. G., Petrucelli L., Fishbein L., Hart E. R., Pallotta A. J., Bates R. R., Falk H. L., Gart J. J. Bioassay of pesticides and industrial chemicals for tumorigenicity in mice: a preliminary note. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Jun;42(6):1101–1114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kier L. D., Brusick D. J., Auletta A. E., Von Halle E. S., Brown M. M., Simmon V. F., Dunkel V., McCann J., Mortelmans K., Kier L. E. The Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsomal assay. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. Mutat Res. 1986 Sep;168(2):69–240. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(86)90002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purchase I. F. Inter-species comparisons of carcinogenicity. Br J Cancer. 1980 Mar;41(3):454–468. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1980.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomatis L., Partensky C., Montesano R. The predictive value of mouse liver tumour induction in carcinogenicity testing--a literature survey. Int J Cancer. 1973 Jul 15;12(1):1–20. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910120102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward J. M., Griesemer R. A., Weisburger E. K. The mouse liver tumor as an endpoint in carcinogenesis tests. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1979 Dec;51(3):389–397. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(79)90363-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiger E. Carcinogenicity of mutagens: predictive capability of the Salmonella mutagenesis assay for rodent carcinogenicity. Cancer Res. 1987 Mar 1;47(5):1287–1296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
