Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1991 Aug;94:25–30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94-1567940

Symptom prevalence and odor-worry interaction near hazardous waste sites.

D Shusterman 1, J Lipscomb 1, R Neutra 1, K Satin 1
PMCID: PMC1567940  PMID: 1954935

Abstract

Retrospective symptom prevalence data, collected from over 2000 adult respondents living near three different hazardous waste sites, were analyzed with respect to both self-reported "environmental worry" and frequency of perceiving environmental (particularly petrochemical) odors. Significant positive relationships were observed between the prevalence of several symptoms (headache, nausea, eye and throat irritation) and both frequency of odor perception and degree of worry. Headaches, for example, showed a prevalence odds ratio of 5.0 comparing respondents who reported noticing environmental odors frequently versus those noticing no such odors and 10.8 comparing those who described themselves as "very worried" versus "not worried" about environmental conditions in their neighborhood. Elimination of respondents who ascribed their environmental worry to illness in themselves or in family members did not materially affect the strength of the observed associations. In addition to their independent effects, odor perception and environmental worry exhibited positive interaction as determinants of symptom prevalence, as evidenced by a prevalence odds ratio of 38.1 comparing headaches among the high worry/frequent-odor group and the no-worry/no-odor group. In comparison neighborhoods with no nearby waste sites, environmental worry has been found to be associated with symptom occurrence as well. Potential explanations for these observations are presented, including the possibility that odors serve as a sensory cue for the manifestation of stress-related illness (or heightened awareness of underlying symptoms) among individuals concerned about the quality of their neighborhood environment.

Full text

PDF
25

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amoore J. E., Hautala E. Odor as an aid to chemical safety: odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J Appl Toxicol. 1983 Dec;3(6):272–290. doi: 10.1002/jat.2550030603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker D. B., Greenland S., Mendlein J., Harmon P. A health study of two communities near the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site. Arch Environ Health. 1988 Sep-Oct;43(5):325–334. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1988.9934943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Neutra R. R. Epidemiology for and with a distrustful community. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Oct;62:393–397. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8562393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ozonoff D., Colten M. E., Cupples A., Heeren T., Schatzkin A., Mangione T., Dresner M., Colton T. Health problems reported by residents of a neighborhood contaminated by a hazardous waste facility. Am J Ind Med. 1987;11(5):581–597. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700110510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roht L. H., Vernon S. W., Weir F. W., Pier S. M., Sullivan P., Reed L. J. Community exposure to hazardous waste disposal sites: assessing reporting bias. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;122(3):418–433. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shusterman D., Balmes J., Cone J. Behavioral sensitization to irritants/odorants after acute overexposures. J Occup Med. 1988 Jul;30(7):565–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Steiner J. E. Discussion paper: innate, discriminative human facial expressions to taste and smell stimulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 Sep 27;237(0):229–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES