Abstract
To assess the effect of interim clean-up measures on the current health of a community, we conducted a follow-up survey of 193 residents living near the McColl waste disposal site and a comparison area located approximately 5 miles from the site. Results from this survey were compared with results from a similar survey conducted 7 years earlier. Odors were detected at least once per week by 32.7% of "high-exposed" respondents in 1988 compared with 68.5% in 1981, but prevalence odds ratios (PORs) comparing symptom reporting between "high-exposed" and comparison-area respondents were greater than that of the 1981 survey for 89% of symptoms. PORs comparing symptom reporting between these two areas were greater than 2.0 for 64% of symptoms assessed in the current survey. Symptoms reported in excess did not represent a single organ system or suggest a mechanism of response. PORs comparing respondents who were very worried about the environment and those reporting no worry were greater than 2.0 for 86% of symptoms. These finding, along with environmental data from the area, suggest that living near the waste disposal site and being very worried about the environment, rather than a toxicologic effect of chemical from the site, explain excess symptom reporting found in this follow-up study.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker D. B., Greenland S., Mendlein J., Harmon P. A health study of two communities near the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site. Arch Environ Health. 1988 Sep-Oct;43(5):325–334. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1988.9934943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gart J. J., Zweifel J. R. On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantal bioassay. Biometrika. 1967 Jun;54(1):181–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozonoff D., Colten M. E., Cupples A., Heeren T., Schatzkin A., Mangione T., Dresner M., Colton T. Health problems reported by residents of a neighborhood contaminated by a hazardous waste facility. Am J Ind Med. 1987;11(5):581–597. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700110510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roht L. H., Vernon S. W., Weir F. W., Pier S. M., Sullivan P., Reed L. J. Community exposure to hazardous waste disposal sites: assessing reporting bias. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;122(3):418–433. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]