Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1991 Jun;93:59–62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919359

Senescence as a mode of tumor suppression.

R Sager 1
PMCID: PMC1568048  PMID: 1663451

Abstract

Two independent lines of experimental evidence are presented in support of the hypothesis that senescence is a normal mechanism of tumor suppression, a homeostatic device designed through evolution to limit cell proliferation irreversibly and thereby to protect the organism against cancer. One set of experiments uses normal human foreskin fibroblasts, transfected at early passage with SV40 DNA and subsequently infected with the K-ras virus. If the cells are immortal prior to infection, they become tumorigenic and make large tumors in nude mice, whereas if they are not immortal, though expressing SV40 T-antigen, they make tiny tumors that senesce in the test mouse after as many doublings as similar cells make in culture. This result demonstrates that immortalization is essential for progressive tumor growth in vivo. The second set of experiments demonstrate that normal human mammary epithelial cells can be immortalized by transfection with viral DNA from human papilloma virus 16 or 18, although these viruses have not been associated with breast cancer. The effective immortalization and other premalignant changes induced by human papilloma virus transfection are accompanied by chromosome changes that may contribute to the partially transformed phenotypes. None of the cloned or pooled transfectants have been tumorigenic in the nude mouse assay. Here, too, immortalization is experimentally separable from tumor-forming ability.

Full text

PDF
59

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Band V., Sager R. Distinctive traits of normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells expressed in a medium that supports long-term growth of both cell types. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1249–1253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Band V., Zajchowski D., Kulesa V., Sager R. Human papilloma virus DNAs immortalize normal human mammary epithelial cells and reduce their growth factor requirements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):463–467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dyson N., Howley P. M., Münger K., Harlow E. The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Science. 1989 Feb 17;243(4893):934–937. doi: 10.1126/science.2537532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dürst M., Dzarlieva-Petrusevska R. T., Boukamp P., Fusenig N. E., Gissmann L. Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of immortalized human primary keratinocytes obtained after transfection with human papillomavirus type 16 DNA. Oncogene. 1987;1(3):251–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galloway D. A., McDougall J. K. Human papillomaviruses and carcinomas. Adv Virus Res. 1989;37:125–171. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60834-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaur P., McDougall J. K. Characterization of primary human keratinocytes transformed by human papillomavirus type 18. J Virol. 1988 Jun;62(6):1917–1924. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.6.1917-1924.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Brien W., Stenman G., Sager R. Suppression of tumor growth by senescence in virally transformed human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8659–8663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pereira-Smith O. M., Smith J. R. Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: identification of four complementation groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6042–6046. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pirisi L., Yasumoto S., Feller M., Doniger J., DiPaolo J. A. Transformation of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes with human papillomavirus type 16 DNA. J Virol. 1987 Apr;61(4):1061–1066. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.4.1061-1066.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Popescu N. C., DiPaolo J. A. Integration of human papillomavirus 16 DNA and genomic rearrangements in immortalized human keratinocyte lines. Cancer Res. 1990 Feb 15;50(4):1316–1323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rhim J. S., Jay G., Arnstein P., Price F. M., Sanford K. K., Aaronson S. A. Neoplastic transformation of human epidermal keratinocytes by AD12-SV40 and Kirsten sarcoma viruses. Science. 1985 Mar 8;227(4691):1250–1252. doi: 10.1126/science.2579430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sager R. Tumor suppressor genes: the puzzle and the promise. Science. 1989 Dec 15;246(4936):1406–1412. doi: 10.1126/science.2574499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Werness B. A., Levine A. J., Howley P. M. Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53. Science. 1990 Apr 6;248(4951):76–79. doi: 10.1126/science.2157286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES