Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1991 Dec;96:223–238. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9196223

Assessment of spatial variation of risks in small populations.

W B Riggan 1, K G Manton 1, J P Creason 1, M A Woodbury 1, E Stallard 1
PMCID: PMC1568243  PMID: 1820268

Abstract

Often environmental hazards are assessed by examining the spatial variation of disease-specific mortality or morbidity rates. These rates, when estimated for small local populations, can have a high degree of random variation or uncertainty associated with them. If those rate estimates are used to prioritize environmental clean-up actions or to allocate resources, then those decisions may be influenced by this high degree of uncertainty. Unfortunately, the effect of this uncertainty is not to add "random noise" into the decision-making process, but to systematically bias action toward the smallest populations where uncertainty is greatest and where extreme high and low rate deviations are most likely to be manifest by chance. We present a statistical procedure for adjusting rate estimates for differences in variability due to differentials in local area population sizes. Such adjustments produce rate estimates for areas that have better properties than the unadjusted rates for use in making statistically based decisions about the entire set of areas. Examples are provided for county variation in bladder, stomach, and lung cancer mortality rates for U.S. white males for the period 1970 to 1979.

Full text

PDF
223

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslow N. E., Day N. E. Indirect standardization and multiplicative models for rates, with reference to the age adjustment of cancer incidence and relative frequency data. J Chronic Dis. 1975 Jun;28(5-6):289–303. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(75)90010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brillinger D. R. The natural variability of vital rates and associated statistics. Biometrics. 1986 Dec;42(4):693–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaldor J., Clayton D. Role of advanced statistical techniques in cancer mapping. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1989;114:87–98. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-83651-0_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lui K. J., Martinez B., Mercy J. An application of the empirical Bayes approach to directly adjusted rates: a note on suicide mapping in California. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1990 Fall;20(3):240–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Manton K. G., Stallard E. A cohort analysis of U.S. stomach cancer mortality 1950-1977. Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Mar;11(1):49–61. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Manton K. G., Stallard E., Creason J. P., Riggan W. B. U.S. cancer mortality 1950-1978: a strategy for analyzing spatial and temporal patterns. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 May;60:369–380. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8560369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Manton K. G., Stallard E. Methods for the analysis of mortality risks across heterogeneous small populations: examination of space-time gradients in cancer mortality in North Carolina counties 1970-75. Demography. 1981 May;18(2):217–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manton K. G., Stallard E., Woodbury M. A., Riggan W. B., Creason J. P., Mason T. J. Statistically adjusted estimates of geographic mortality profiles. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 May;78(5):805–815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manton K. G., Woodbury M. A., Stallard E. A variance components approach to categorical data models with heterogeneous cell populations: analysis of spatial gradients in lung cancer mortality rates in North Carolina counties. Biometrics. 1981 Jun;37(2):259–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manton K. G., Woodbury M. A., Stallard E., Riggan W. B., Creason J. P., Pellom A. C. Empirical Bayes procedures for stabilizing maps of U.S. cancer mortality rates. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989 Sep;84(407):637–650. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsutakawa R. K. Mixed model for analyzing geographic variability in mortality rates. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988 Mar;83(401):37–42. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsutakawa R. K., Shoop G. L., Marienfeld C. J. Empirical Bayes estimation of cancer mortality rates. Stat Med. 1985 Apr-Jun;4(2):201–212. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES