Abstract
Because there are no direct biological markers for the substances implicated in indoor air exposure, it is impossible to directly measure if an individual or group of individuals has been exposed to a potentially neurotoxic substance in the workplace. Behavioral changes may be the earliest and only manifestation of central nervous system (CNS) effects and are often too subtle to be revealed by routine physical or neurological examination. Neuropsychological techniques are sensitive to subtle behavioral/cognitive changes that can result from exposure to neurotoxins. These techniques consist of oral and written tests that are administered by a trained examiner on a one-to-one basis. In general, a wide variety of cognitive domains are evaluated. The typical battery generally includes assessing orientation, attention, intelligence, language, visual memory, verbal memory, perception, visuoconstruction, simple motor speed, psychomotor speed, and mood. As with most assessment techniques, the neuropsychological methods have limitations. One major drawback is the availability of appropriate norms that are used to compare the results of a specific individual. Because these tasks are greatly affected by age, intelligence, and in some instances sex, the availability of appropriate norms is mandatory to determine if the CNS has been effected. Although neuropsychological tests are sensitive to the presence of CNS involvement, they are not specific. Patterns of performance seen with specific instances of neurotoxic exposure may also be seen with a number of other diseases of the CNS such as dementia, cerebrovascular disease, hydrocephalus, or normal aging. In addition, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety and/or depression are often manifested as cognitive difficulties that will mimic the cognitive dysfunction seen with toxicity of the CNS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bleecker M. L., Bolla-Wilson K., Agnew J., Meyers D. A. Age-related sex differences in verbal memory. J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;44(3):403–411. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<403::aid-jclp2270440315>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bleecker M. L., Bolla-Wilson K., Kawas C., Agnew J. Age-specific norms for the Mini-Mental State Exam. Neurology. 1988 Oct;38(10):1565–1568. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.10.1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolla-Wilson K., Wilson R. J., Bleecker M. L. Conditioning of physical symptoms after neurotoxic exposure. J Occup Med. 1988 Sep;30(9):684–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson A., Fogel B. S., Faust D. Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Feb;174(2):73–83. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198602000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan C. M., Morrow L. A., Bromet E. J., Parkinson D. K. Assessment of neuropsychological dysfunction in the workplace: normative data from the Pittsburgh Occupational Exposures Test Battery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987 Dec;9(6):665–679. doi: 10.1080/01688638708405209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan C., Butters N. Learning and memory impairments in young and old alcoholics: evidence for the premature-aging hypothesis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1980 Jul;4(3):288–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1980.tb04816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schottenfeld R. S., Cullen M. R. Occupation-induced posttraumatic stress disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Feb;142(2):198–202. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schottenfeld R. S., Cullen M. R. Recognition of occupation-induced posttraumatic stress disorders. J Occup Med. 1986 May;28(5):365–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutton W. L. Psychiatric disorders and industrial toxicology. Int Psychiatry Clin. 1969;6(4):339–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]