Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1981 Jan;37:61–73. doi: 10.1289/ehp.813761

Germinal cell mutagenesis in specially designed maize genotypes.

M J Plewa, E D Wagner
PMCID: PMC1568634  PMID: 6780335

Abstract

We have used three inbreds of Zea mays in our in situ and laboratory studies in environmental mutagenesis. Inbred W22 plants homozygous for wx-C were used in a study to detect the possible mutagenic properties of 32 pesticides or combination of pesticides under modern agricultural conditions. The large numbers of pollen grains analyzed and the ease in detecting mutant pollen grains enabled us to treat the experimental plants with field recommended rates of pesticides. In a current study we are evaluating the possible mutagenicity of Chicago municipal sewage sludge. We are measuring the frequency of mutant pollen grains in inbred M14 at both the wx-C and wx-90 heteroalleles. These plants were exposed to various concentrations of municipal sewage sludge under field conditions. We have inbred Early-Early Synthetic for five generations and tested this inbred with known mutagens. Early-Early Synthetic is a rapidly maturing inbred growing from kernel to anthesis in approximately 4 weeks and attaining a height of approximately 50 cm. Plants of this inbred have been chronically treated with ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS) or maleic hydrazide (MH) under laboratory conditions and forward mutation at the wx locus was measured in the pollen grains. EMS and MH were mutagenic at concentrations of 1 microM and 10 nM, respectively. The concentrations of EMS and MH were calibrated in Early-Early Synthetic to a linear increase in the frequency of forward mutant pollen grains. The construction of a maize monitor for environmental mutagens is currently in progress. This assay will measure forward or reverse mutation at the wx locus in pollen grains, point mutation in somatic cells and will incorporate a cytogenetic endpoint in root-tip cells.

Full text

PDF
61

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramamson S. Comments on and summary of panel on assessment of in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity data with regard to safety evaluation. Environ Health Perspect. 1973 Dec;6:193–193. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7306193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames B. N. Identifying environmental chemicals causing mutations and cancer. Science. 1979 May 11;204(4393):587–593. doi: 10.1126/science.373122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartsch H. Predictive value of mutagenicity tests in chemical carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 1976 Jun;38(3):177–190. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(76)90189-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benzer S. FINE STRUCTURE OF A GENETIC REGION IN BACTERIOPHAGE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Jun 15;41(6):344–354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.6.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouck N., di Mayorca G. Somatic mutation as the basis for malignant transformation of BHK cells by chemical carcinogens. Nature. 1976 Dec 23;264(5588):722–727. doi: 10.1038/264722a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature. 1975 May 15;255(5505):197–200. doi: 10.1038/255197a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conger B. V., Carabia J. V. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of sodium azide versus ethyl methanesulfonate in maize: induction of somatic mutations at the yg2 locus by treatment of seeds differing in metabolic state and cell population. Mutat Res. 1977 Aug;46(4):285–296. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(77)90005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crow J. F. The evaluation of chemical mutagenicity data in relation to population risk: impact of various types of genetic damage and risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 1973 Dec;6:1–5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.73061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Serres F. J. Mutagenicity of chemical carcinogens. Mutat Res. 1976 Nov 1;41(1 SPEL):43–50. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Serres F. J. The utility of short-term tests for mutagenicity in the toxicological evaluation of environmental agents. Mutat Res. 1975 Nov;33(1 Spec No):11–15. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Environmental mutagenic hazards. Science. 1975 Feb 14;187(4176):503–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eriksson G., Tavrin E. Variation in radiosensitivity during meiosis of pollen mother cells in maize. Hereditas. 1965;54(2):156–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1965.tb02013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Freese E. Thresholds in toxic, teratogenic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effects. Environ Health Perspect. 1973 Dec;6:171–178. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7306171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haley T. J. Maleic hydrazide: should the Delaney amendment apply to its use? J Toxicol Environ Health. 1977 May;2(5):1085–1094. doi: 10.1080/15287397709529506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz A. J. Design and analysis of experiments on mutagenicity. II. Assays involving microorganisms. Mutat Res. 1979 Apr;64(2):61–77. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(79)90001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klekowski E., Levin D. E. Mutagens in a river heavily polluted with paper recycling wastes: results of field and laboratory mutagen assays. Environ Mutagen. 1979;1(3):209–219. doi: 10.1002/em.2860010303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Legator M. S., Flamm W. G. Environmental mutagenesis and repair. Annu Rev Biochem. 1973;42:683–708. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.003343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. NELSON O. E., RINES H. W. The enzymatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1962 Oct 31;9:297–300. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(62)90043-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nelson O E. The Waxy Locus in Maize. I. Intralocus Recombination Frequency Estimates by Pollen and by Conventional Analyses. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47(6):737–742. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson O. E. Intracistron Recombination in the Wx/wx Region in Maize. Science. 1959 Sep 25;130(3378):794–795. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3378.794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nelson O. E. The WAXY Locus in Maize. II. the Location of the Controlling Element Alleles. Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):507–524. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson O. E. The Waxy Locus in Maize III. Effect of Structural Heterozygosity on Intragenic Recombination and Flanking Marker Assortment. Genetics. 1975 Jan;79(1):31–44. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nilan R. A. Potential of plant genetic systems for monitoring and screening mutagens. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Dec;27:181–196. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7827181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Plewa M. J. Activation of chemicals into mutagens by green plants: a preliminary discussion. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Dec;27:45–50. doi: 10.1289/ehp.782745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schairer L. A., Van't Hof J., Hayes C. G., Burton R. M., de Serres F. J. Exploratory monitoring of air pollutants for mutagenicity activity with the Tradescantia stamen hair system. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Dec;27:51–60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.782751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weatherwax P. A Rare Carbohydrate in Waxy Maize. Genetics. 1922 Nov;7(6):568–572. doi: 10.1093/genetics/7.6.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Serres F. J. Problems associated with the application of short-term tests for mutagenicity in mass-screening programs. Environ Mutagen. 1979;1(3):203–208. doi: 10.1002/em.2860010302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES