Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1981 Dec;42:149–161. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8142149

Problems in evaluating radiation dose via terrestrial and aquatic pathways.

B E Vaughan, J K Soldat, R G Schreckhise, E C Watson, D H McKenzie
PMCID: PMC1568798  PMID: 7037381

Abstract

This review is concerned with exposure risk and the environmental pathways models used for predictive assessment of radiation dose. Exposure factors, the adequacy of available data, and the model subcomponents are critically reviewed from the standpoint of absolute error propagation. Although the models are inherently capable of better absolute accuracy, a calculated dose is usually overestimated by from two to six orders of magnitude, in practice. The principal reason for so large an error lies in using "generic" concentration ratios in situations where site specific data are needed. Major opinion of the model makers suggests a number midway between these extremes, with only a small likelihood of ever underestimating the radiation dose. Detailed evaluations are made of source considerations influencing dose (i.e., physical and chemical status of released material); dispersal mechanisms (atmospheric, hydrologic and biotic vector transport); mobilization and uptake mechanisms (i.e., chemical and other factors affecting the biological availability of radioelements); and critical pathways. Examples are shown of confounding in food-chain pathways, due to uncritical application of concentration ratios. Current thoughts of replacing the critical pathways approach to calculating dose with comprehensive model calculations are also shown to be ill-advised, given present limitations in the comprehensive data base. The pathways models may also require improved parametrization, as they are not at present structured adequately to lend themselves to validation. The extremely wide errors associated with predicting exposure stand in striking contrast to the error range associated with the extrapolation of animal effects data to the human being.

Full text

PDF
149

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anspaugh L. R., Shinn J. H., Phelps P. L., Kennedy N. C. Plutonium--health implications for man. Resuspension and redistribution of plutonium in soils. Health Phys. 1975 Oct;29(4):571–582. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197510000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrell B. G., Air G. M., Hutchison C. A., 3rd Overlapping genes in bacteriophage phiX174. Nature. 1976 Nov 4;264(5581):34–41. doi: 10.1038/264034a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Book S. A., Garner R. J., Soldat J. K., Bustad L. K. Thyroidal burdens of 129I from various dietary sources. Health Phys. 1977 Mar;32(3):143–148. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197703000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cataldo D. A., Wildung R. E. Soil and plant factors influencing the accumulation of heavy metals by plants. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Dec;27:149–159. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7827149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eberhardt L. L., Hanson W. A simulion model for an Arctic food chain. Health Phys. 1969 Dec;17(6):793–806. doi: 10.1097/00004032-196912000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emery R. M., Klopfer D. C., McShane M. C. The ecological export of plutonium from a reprocessing waste pond. Health Phys. 1978 Mar;34(3):255–269. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197803000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haller W. A., Perkins R. W. Organic iodine-131 compounds released from a nuclear fuel chemical processing plant. Health Phys. 1967 Jul;13(7):733–738. doi: 10.1097/00004032-196707000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Means J. L., Crerar D. A., Duguid J. O. Migration of radioactive wastes: radionuclide mobilization by complexing agents. Science. 1978 Jun 30;200(4349):1477–1481. doi: 10.1126/science.200.4349.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SOLDAT J. K. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN I-131 CONCENTRATIONS IN VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES. Health Phys. 1963 Dec;9:1167–1171. doi: 10.1097/00004032-196312000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Soldat J. K. Radiation doses from iodine-129 in the environment. Health Phys. 1976 Jan;30(1):61–70. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stather J. W., Howden S. A method for investigating the metabolism of the transportable fraction of plutonium aerosols. Phys Med Biol. 1975 Jan;20(1):106–124. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/20/1/010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wildung R. E., Garland T. R., Cataldo D. A. Accumulation of technetium by plants. Health Phys. 1977 Apr;32(4):314–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES