Abstract
The effects of well-defined asbestos and man-made mineral fibers, as well as glass and synthetic fluoroamphibole, on phagocytizing permanent rat tumor cells were tested. The following parameters were compared: cell proliferation as determined by cell count and 3H-thymidine incorporation, RNA synthesis by 3H-uridine uptake, protein synthesis by incorporation of 3H-labeled amino acids, protein content and plasma membrane permeability by release of lactic dehydrogenase. The dosage of most of the dusts was estimated gravimetrically, but for some dusts also numerically. Because of the wide range of different fibers lengths, diameters and specific weights, it was sometimes difficult to compare chemically and physically differing fiber fractions with the same fiber counts. In some cases, resulting weights are so different that a direct comparison of the conclusions is impossible. The results with fibers of diverse sources showed the same trends: the toxicity of fibers increases with increasing length and dose. In this test system we found an inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis. Protein synthesis as measured by amino acid uptake per total cell culture decreased, but the protein content of the single cell increased as determined by the Lowry method. The increase of plasma membrane permeability as determined by lactic dehydrogenase was also dependent on fiber length and concentration. Generally the thinner the fiber, the greater the toxicity when gravimetrical dosage and the same length distributions are employed. Beyond that we can state that the toxicity of fibers from different sources with similar fiber dimensions is similar. One of the glass fiber fractions has a comparable geometry (length, diameter) to the UICC fraction of chrysotile and exhibits the same high toxicity.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beck E. G., Holt P. F., Manojlović N. Comparison of effects on macrophage cultures of glass fibre, glass powder, and chrysotile asbestos. Br J Ind Med. 1972 Jul;29(3):280–286. doi: 10.1136/oem.29.3.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown R. C., Chamberlain M., Davies R., Gaffen J., Skidmore J. W. In vitro biological effects of glass fibers. J Environ Pathol Toxicol. 1979 Jul-Aug;2(6):1369–1383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown R. C., Chamberlain M., Griffiths D. M., Timbrell V. The effect of fibre size on the in vitro biological activity of three types of amphibole asbestos. Int J Cancer. 1978 Dec;22(6):721–727. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910220614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanton M. F., Laynard M., Tegeris A., Miller E., May M., Kent E. Carcinogenicity of fibrous glass: pleural response in the rat in relation to fiber dimension. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Mar;58(3):587–603. doi: 10.1093/jnci/58.3.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanton M. F., Wrench C. Mechanisms of mesothelioma induction with asbestos and fibrous glass. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Mar;48(3):797–821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tilkes F., Beck E. G. Comparison of length-dependent cytotoxicity of inhalable asbestos and man-made mineral fibres. IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(30):475–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]