Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1983 Jan;47:177–187. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8347177

Mutagenicity in emissions from coal- and oil-fired boilers.

I Alfheim, J G Bergström, D Jenssen, M Møller
PMCID: PMC1569406  PMID: 6825617

Abstract

The mutagenicity of emission samples from three oil-fired and four coal-fired boilers have been compared by using the Salmonella/microsome assay. Very little or no mutagenic activity was observed in samples from five of these boilers. The sample from one oil-fired boiler showed mutagenic activity of about 500 revertants/MJ, and the sample from a coal-fired fluidized bed combustor had an activity of 58,000 revertants/MJ measured with strain TA 98 in the absence of metabolic activation. All samples contained substances that were cytotoxic to the test bacteria, thus making it difficult to obtain linear dose-response curves. Mutagenic activity at low levels may remain undetected due to this toxicity of the samples. Samples with mutagenic activity below the detection limit in the Salmonella test have also been tested for forward mutations at the HGPRT locus in V79 hamster cells. Weak mutagenic effects were detected in two of the samples, whereas the sample from one oil-fired boiler remained negative. In this test, as well as in the Salmonella test, a strong cytotoxic effect could be observed with all samples.

Full text

PDF
177

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames B. N., Durston W. E., Yamasaki E., Lee F. D. Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Aug;70(8):2281–2285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.8.2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ames B. N., Mccann J., Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1975 Dec;31(6):347–364. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(75)90046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjørseth A., Eidså G., Gether J., Landmark L., Møller M. Detection of mutagens in complex samples by the Salmonella assay applied directly on thin-layer chromatography plates. Science. 1982 Jan 1;215(4528):87–89. doi: 10.1126/science.7031897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chrisp C. E., Fisher G. L., Lammert J. E. Mutagenicity of filtrates from respirable coal fly ash. Science. 1978 Jan 6;199(4324):73–75. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4324.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark C. R., Hobbs C. H. Mutagenicity of effluents from an experimental fluidized bed coal combustor. Environ Mutagen. 1980;2(2):101–109. doi: 10.1002/em.2860020202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher G. L., Chrisp C. E., Raabe O. G. Physical factors affecting the mutagenicity of fly ash from a coal-fired power plant. Science. 1979 May 25;204(4395):879–881. doi: 10.1126/science.375394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hedenstedt A., Jenssen D., Lidestein B-M, Ramel C., Rannug U., Stern R. M. Mutagenicity of fume particles from stainless steel welding. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1977 Dec;3(4):203–211. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kubitschek H. E., Venta L. Mutagenicity of coal fly ash from electric power plant precipitators. Environ Mutagen. 1979;1(1):79–82. doi: 10.1002/em.2860010114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kubitschek H. E., Williams D. M. Mutagenicity of fly ash from a fluidized-bed combuster during start-up and steady operating conditions. Mutat Res. 1980 Mar;77(3):287–291. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(80)90063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith-Sonneborn J., Palizzi R. A., Herr C., Fisher G. L. Mutagenicity of fly ash particles in Paramecium. Science. 1981 Jan 9;211(4478):180–182. doi: 10.1126/science.7444461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Zeeland A. A., Simons J. W. Linear dose--response relationships after prolonged expression times in V-79 Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res. 1976 Apr;35(1):129–137. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90175-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES