Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1997 Jun;9(6):925–945. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.6.925

Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of Chlamydomonas.

H Cerutti 1, A M Johnson 1, N W Gillham 1, J E Boynton 1
PMCID: PMC156968  PMID: 9212467

Abstract

The unstable expression of introduced genes poses a serious problem for the application of transgenic technology in plants. In transformants of the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, expression of a eubacterial aadA gene, conferring spectinomycin resistance, is transcriptionally suppressed by a reversible epigenetic mechanism(s). Variations in the size and frequency of colonies surviving on different concentrations of spectinomycin as well as the levels of transcriptional activity of the introduced transgene(s) suggest the existence of intermediate expression states in genetically identical cells. Gene silencing does not correlate with methylation of the integrated DNA and does not involve large alterations in its chromatin structure, as revealed by digestion with restriction endonucleases and DNase I. Transgene repression is enhanced by lower temperatures, similar to position effect variegation in Drosophila. By analogy to epigenetic phenomena in several eukaryotes, our results suggest a possible role for (hetero)chromatic chromosomal domains in transcriptional inactivation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allshire R. C., Javerzat J. P., Redhead N. J., Cranston G. Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres. Cell. 1994 Jan 14;76(1):157–169. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antequera F., Tamame M., Villanueva J. R., Santos T. DNA methylation in the fungi. J Biol Chem. 1984 Jul 10;259(13):8033–8036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio O. M., Gottschling D. E. Overcoming telomeric silencing: a trans-activator competes to establish gene expression in a cell cycle-dependent way. Genes Dev. 1994 May 15;8(10):1133–1146. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.10.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aramayo R., Metzenberg R. L. Meiotic transvection in fungi. Cell. 1996 Jul 12;86(1):103–113. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80081-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bird A. The essentials of DNA methylation. Cell. 1992 Jul 10;70(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop J. O., Smith P. Mechanism of chromosomal integration of microinjected DNA. Mol Biol Med. 1989 Aug;6(4):283–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blankenship J. E., Kindle K. L. Expression of chimeric genes by the light-regulated cabII-1 promoter in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a cabII-1/nit1 gene functions as a dominant selectable marker in a nit1- nit2- strain. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):5268–5279. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.5268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W., Harris E. H., Hosler J. P., Johnson A. M., Jones A. R., Randolph-Anderson B. L., Robertson D., Klein T. M., Shark K. B. Chloroplast transformation in Chlamydomonas with high velocity microprojectiles. Science. 1988 Jun 10;240(4858):1534–1538. doi: 10.1126/science.2897716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brink R. A. Paramutation. Annu Rev Genet. 1973;7:129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.07.120173.001021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brusslan J. A., Karlin-Neumann G. A., Huang L., Tobin E. M. An Arabidopsis mutant with a reduced level of cab140 RNA is a result of cosuppression. Plant Cell. 1993 Jun;5(6):667–677. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cerutti H., Johnson A. M., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W. Inhibition of chloroplast DNA recombination and repair by dominant negative mutants of Escherichia coli RecA. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;15(6):3003–3011. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cerutti H., Johnson A. M., Gillham N. W., Boynton J. E. A eubacterial gene conferring spectinomycin resistance on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: integration into the nuclear genome and gene expression. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):97–110. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cerutti H., Osman M., Grandoni P., Jagendorf A. T. A homolog of Escherichia coli RecA protein in plastids of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8068–8072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen J. D., Pirrotta V. Stepwise assembly of hyperaggregated forms of Drosophila zeste mutant protein suppresses white gene expression in vivo. EMBO J. 1993 May;12(5):2061–2073. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05855.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cogoni C., Irelan J. T., Schumacher M., Schmidhauser T. J., Selker E. U., Macino G. Transgene silencing of the al-1 gene in vegetative cells of Neurospora is mediated by a cytoplasmic effector and does not depend on DNA-DNA interactions or DNA methylation. EMBO J. 1996 Jun 17;15(12):3153–3163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Csink A. K., Henikoff S. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):529–531. doi: 10.1038/381529a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dehio C., Schell J. Identification of plant genetic loci involved in a posttranscriptional mechanism for meiotically reversible transgene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5538–5542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dernburg A. F., Broman K. W., Fung J. C., Marshall W. F., Philips J., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W. Perturbation of nuclear architecture by long-distance chromosome interactions. Cell. 1996 May 31;85(5):745–759. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81240-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dorer D. R., Henikoff S. Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell. 1994 Jul 1;77(7):993–1002. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90439-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eden S., Cedar H. Role of DNA methylation in the regulation of transcription. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):255–259. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80052-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Elgin S. C. Heterochromatin and gene regulation in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996 Apr;6(2):193–202. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80050-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. English J. J., Mueller E., Baulcombe D. C. Suppression of Virus Accumulation in Transgenic Plants Exhibiting Silencing of Nuclear Genes. Plant Cell. 1996 Feb;8(2):179–188. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Festenstein R., Tolaini M., Corbella P., Mamalaki C., Parrington J., Fox M., Miliou A., Jones M., Kioussis D. Locus control region function and heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation. Science. 1996 Feb 23;271(5252):1123–1125. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5252.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gagné G., Guertin M. The early genetic response to light in the green unicellular alga Chlamydomonas eugametos grown under light/dark cycles involves genes that represent direct responses to light and photosynthesis. Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Feb;18(3):429–445. doi: 10.1007/BF00040659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldschmidt-Clermont M. Transgenic expression of aminoglycoside adenine transferase in the chloroplast: a selectable marker of site-directed transformation of chlamydomonas. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Aug 11;19(15):4083–4089. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.15.4083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gottschling D. E. Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4062–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hayashi S., Ruddell A., Sinclair D., Grigliatti T. Chromosomal structure is altered by mutations that suppress or enhance position effect variegation. Chromosoma. 1990 Oct;99(6):391–400. doi: 10.1007/BF01726690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hendrich B. D., Willard H. F. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: the effect of altered chromatin structure from yeast to mammals. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4(Spec No):1765–1777. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.suppl_1.1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Henikoff S. Gene silencing in Drosophila. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;197:193–208. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79145-1_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hohn T., Corsten S., Rieke S., Müller M., Rothnie H. Methylation of coding region alone inhibits gene expression in plant protoplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8334–8339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hollick J. B., Patterson G. I., Coe E. H., Jr, Cone K. C., Chandler V. L. Allelic interactions heritably alter the activity of a metastable maize pl allele. Genetics. 1995 Oct;141(2):709–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.2.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jorgensen R. A., Cluster P. D., English J., Que Q., Napoli C. A. Chalcone synthase cosuppression phenotypes in petunia flowers: comparison of sense vs. antisense constructs and single-copy vs. complex T-DNA sequences. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Aug;31(5):957–973. doi: 10.1007/BF00040715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jorgensen R. A. Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression States. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):686–691. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5211.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karpen G. H. Position-effect variegation and the new biology of heterochromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994 Apr;4(2):281–291. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Keller L. R., Schloss J. A., Silflow C. D., Rosenbaum J. L. Transcription of alpha- and beta-tubulin genes in vitro in isolated Chlamydomonas reinhardi nuclei. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):1138–1143. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kermicle J. L., Eggleston W. B., Alleman M. Organization of paramutagenicity in R-stippled maize. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):361–372. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Keshet I., Lieman-Hurwitz J., Cedar H. DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin. Cell. 1986 Feb 28;44(4):535–543. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kindle K. L. High-frequency nuclear transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Feb;87(3):1228–1232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.3.1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kozminski K. G., Diener D. R., Rosenbaum J. L. High level expression of nonacetylatable alpha-tubulin in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1993;25(2):158–170. doi: 10.1002/cm.970250205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Locke J. Examination of DNA sequences undergoing chromatin conformation changes at a variegating breakpoint in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica. 1993;92(1):33–41. doi: 10.1007/BF00057505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Loo S., Rine J. Silencers and domains of generalized repression. Science. 1994 Jun 17;264(5166):1768–1771. doi: 10.1126/science.8209257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Martienssen R. A., Richards E. J. DNA methylation in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):234–242. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Matzke A. J., Neuhuber F., Park Y. D., Ambros P. F., Matzke M. A. Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Aug 2;244(3):219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00285449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Matzke M. A., Matzke AJM. How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. McCall K., Bender W. Probes of chromatin accessibility in the Drosophila bithorax complex respond differently to Polycomb-mediated repression. EMBO J. 1996 Feb 1;15(3):569–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Meyer P., Heidmann I., Niedenhof I. Differences in DNA-methylation are associated with a paramutation phenomenon in transgenic petunia. Plant J. 1993 Jul;4(1):89–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04010089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer P., Saedler H. HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING IN PLANTS. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47(NaN):23–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Milot E., Strouboulis J., Trimborn T., Wijgerde M., de Boer E., Langeveld A., Tan-Un K., Vergeer W., Yannoutsos N., Grosveld F. Heterochromatin effects on the frequency and duration of LCR-mediated gene transcription. Cell. 1996 Oct 4;87(1):105–114. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81327-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Morris R. L., Keller L. R., Zweidler A., Rizzo P. J. Analysis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii histones and chromatin. J Protozool. 1990 Mar-Apr;37(2):117–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1990.tb05880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nelson M., McClelland M. Site-specific methylation: effect on DNA modification methyltransferases and restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19 (Suppl):2045–2071. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.suppl.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Neuhuber F., Park Y. D., Matzke A. J., Matzke M. A. Susceptibility of transgene loci to homology-dependent gene silencing. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Aug 2;244(3):230–241. doi: 10.1007/BF00285450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Park Y. D., Papp I., Moscone E. A., Iglesias V. A., Vaucheret H., Matzke A. J., Matzke M. A. Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 1996 Feb;9(2):183–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.09020183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Patterson G. I., Kubo K. M., Shroyer T., Chandler V. L. Sequences required for paramutation of the maize b gene map to a region containing the promoter and upstream sequences. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1389–1406. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Quinn J. M., Merchant S. Two copper-responsive elements associated with the Chlamydomonas Cyc6 gene function as targets for transcriptional activators. Plant Cell. 1995 May;7(5):623–628. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.5.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Randolph-Anderson B. L., Boynton J. E., Gillham N. W., Harris E. H., Johnson A. M., Dorthu M. P., Matagne R. F. Further characterization of the respiratory deficient dum-1 mutation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and its use as a recipient for mitochondrial transformation. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Jan;236(2-3):235–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00277118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Riggs A. D., Pfeifer G. P. X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory. Trends Genet. 1992 May;8(5):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90219-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sabl J. F., Henikoff S. Copy number and orientation determine the susceptibility of a gene to silencing by nearby heterochromatin in Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):447–458. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schlossherr J., Eggert H., Paro R., Cremer S., Jack R. S. Gene inactivation in Drosophila mediated by the Polycomb gene product or by position-effect variegation does not involve major changes in the accessibility of the chromatin fibre. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 May 25;243(4):453–462. doi: 10.1007/BF00280476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sijen T., Wellink J., Hiriart J. B., Van Kammen A. RNA-Mediated Virus Resistance: Role of Repeated Transgenes and Delineation of Targeted Regions. Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2277–2294. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tam L. W., Lefebvre P. A. Cloning of flagellar genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by DNA insertional mutagenesis. Genetics. 1993 Oct;135(2):375–384. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.2.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Venditti S., Camilloni G. In vivo analysis of chromatin following nystatin-mediated import of active enzymes into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Jan;242(1):100–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00277353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Verdone L., Camilloni G., Di Mauro E., Caserta M. Chromatin remodeling during Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene activation. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):1978–1988. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 1995 May 15;9(10):1263–1277. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.10.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wallrath L. L., Guntur V. P., Rosman L. E., Elgin S. C. DNA representation of variegating heterochromatic P-element inserts in diploid and polytene tissues of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1996 Apr;104(7):519–527. doi: 10.1007/BF00352116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Weiler K. S., Wakimoto B. T. Heterochromatin and gene expression in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:577–605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.003045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Weng A., Engler P., Storb U. The bulk chromatin structure of a murine transgene does not vary with its transcriptional or DNA methylation status. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;15(1):572–579. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wines D. R., Talbert P. B., Clark D. V., Henikoff S. Introduction of a DNA methyltransferase into Drosophila to probe chromatin structure in vivo. Chromosoma. 1996;104(5):332–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00337221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wurtz E. A., Sears B. B., Rabert D. K., Shepherd H. S., Gillham N. W., Boynton J. E. A specific increase in chloroplast gene mutations following growth of Chlamydomonas in 5-fluorodeoxyuridine. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Mar 5;170(3):235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00267056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ye F., Signer E. R. RIGS (repeat-induced gene silencing) in Arabidopsis is transcriptional and alters chromatin configuration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 1;93(20):10881–10886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. de Carvalho Niebel F., Frendo P., Van Montagu M., Cornelissen M. Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):347–358. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. ten Lohuis M., Müller A., Heidmann I., Niedenhof I., Meyer P. A repetitive DNA fragment carrying a hot spot for de novo DNA methylation enhances expression variegation in tobacco and petunia. Plant J. 1995 Dec;8(6):919–932. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.8060919.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES