TABLE 1.
Protein spot no.a | Protein (gene)b | Functional groupc | Expression lower in:d | Quantitatione |
---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | AhpC (ahpC) | Cell processes, protection | 1.060 ± 0.065 | |
0.991 ± 0.034 | ||||
M2 | GapA (gapA) | Metabolism, energy metabolism | 0.999 ± 0.011 | |
0.993 ± 0.079 | ||||
1 | CirA (cirA)* | Transport, outer membrane | Evol | 0.656 ± 0.011 |
0.678 ± 0.052 | ||||
2 | FadL (fadL)* | Transport, outer membrane | Anc | 1.956 ± 0.080 |
2.800 ± 0.195 | ||||
3 | LamB (lamB)* | Transport, outer membrane | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
4 | ArtJ (artJ) | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.504 ± 0.038 |
0.536 ± 0.037 | ||||
5 | GlnH (glnH) | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
6–7 | MalE (malE)* | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
8–9 | MetQ (metQ) | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
10 | MglB (mglB)* | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.736 ± 0.007 |
0.554 ± 0.007 | ||||
11 | MglB (mglB)* | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.599 ± 0.036 |
0.451 ± 0.010 | ||||
12 | ModA (modA)* | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.433 ± 0.008 |
0.408 ± 0.034 | ||||
13 | RbsB (rbsB)* | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
14 | TolB (tolB) | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.165 ± 0.020 |
0.139 ± 0.031 | ||||
15 | TolB (tolB) | Transport, periplasmic space | Evol | 0.206 ± 0.008 |
0.258 ± 0.044 | ||||
16 | ZnuA (znuA) | Transport, periplasmic space | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
17 | AroG (aroG) | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Evol | 0.127 ± 0.008 |
0.203 ± 0.014 | ||||
18 | IlvB (ilvB)** | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
19 | LeuA (leuA)* | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
20 | LeuA (leuA)* | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
21 | SerC (serC)* | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Evol | 0.320 ± 0.008 |
0.380 ± 0.012 | ||||
22 | AceB (aceB) | Metabolism, central intermediary metabolism | Anc | 4.959 ± 0.186 |
6.017 ± 0.285 | ||||
23 | GpmA (gpmA) | Metabolism, central intermediary metabolism | Evol | 0.403 ± 0.071 |
0.344 ± 0.013 | ||||
24 | NfnB (nfnB) | Metabolism, central intermediary metabolism | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
25 | ATPF (atpF) | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol | 0.461 ± 0.002 |
0.524 ± 0.025 | ||||
26 | ATPF (atpF) | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol | 0.409 ± 0.064 |
0.492 ± 0.014 | ||||
27 | Mdh (mdh)* | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol | 0.532 ± 0.047 |
0.545 ± 0.024 | ||||
28 | SucC (sucC)* | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol | 0.631 ± 0.005 |
0.742 ± 0.022 | ||||
29 | SucD (sucD)* | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol | 0.463 ± 0.014 |
0.484 ± 0.029 | ||||
30–31 | PflB (pflB)* | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
32 | FabI (fabI) | Metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis | Evol | 0.497 ± 0.012 |
0.424 ± 0.026 | ||||
33 | FklB (fklB) | Information transfer, chaperone, folding | Evol | 0.374 ± 0.017 |
0.333 ± 0.012 | ||||
34 | GroEL (groL)** | Information transfer, chaperone, folding | Evol | 0.300 ± 0.037 |
0.399 ± 0.040 | ||||
35 | HtpG (htpG) | Information transfer, chaperone, folding | Evol | 0.447 ± 0.026 |
0.454 ± 0.044 | ||||
36 | Aat (aat) | Information transfer, protein degradation | Evol | 0.555 ± 0.038 |
0.564 ± 0.026 | ||||
37 | HslU (hslU) | Information transfer, protein degradation | Evol | 0.468 ± 0.063 |
0.414 ± 0.020 | ||||
38 | Fur (fur)* | Information transfer, transcription | Evol(0) | OFF |
OFF | ||||
39 | AsnS (asnS)** | Information transfer, translation | Evol | 0.556 ± 0.043 |
0.653 ± 0.019 | ||||
40 | AsnS (asnS)** | Information transfer, translation | Evol | 0.505 ± 0.032 |
0.379 ± 0.029 | ||||
41 | GlyS (glyS) | Information transfer, translation | Evol | 0.216 ± 0.039 |
0.238 ± 0.024 | ||||
42 | GlyS (glyS) | Information transfer, translation | Evol | 0.200 ± 0.019 |
0.157 ± 0.021 | ||||
43 | Mannosyl-transferasef | Cell processes | Anc(0) | ON |
ON | ||||
44 | MinD (minD) | Cell processes, cell division | Evol | 0.218 ± 0.029 |
0.292 ± 0.017 | ||||
45 | MinD (minD) | Cell processes, cell division | Evol | 0.272 ± 0.028 |
0.255 ± 0.019 | ||||
46 | GTP-dependent nucleic acid- binding proteinf | GTP-binding protein | Evol | 0.739 ± 0.043 |
0.731 ± 0.061 | ||||
47 | BipA (bipA) | GTP-binding protein, elongation factor | Evol | 0.543 ± 0.029 |
0.442 ± 0.031 | ||||
48 | BipA (bipA) | GTP-binding protein, elongation factor | Evol | 0.542 ± 0.044 |
0.583 ± 0.040 | ||||
49 | YcdO (ycdO) | Hypothetical, unknown | Evol | 0.559 ± 0.068 |
0.633 ± 0.027 | ||||
50 | OppA (oppA) | Transport, periplasmic space | Ara + 1 | 0.315 ± 0.006 |
0.975 ± 0.090 | ||||
51 | ArgT (argT) | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Ancg | 2.204 ± 0.322 |
1.054 ± 0.037 | ||||
52 | MetE (metE) | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Ara + 1 | 0.544 ± 0.048 |
0.983 ± 0.055 | ||||
53 | MetE (metE) | Metabolism, amino-acid biosynthesis | Ara + 1 | 0.409 ± 0.040 |
0.950 ± 0.039 | ||||
54 | GlpK (glpK)* | Metabolism, carbon compound utilization | Ara − 1 | 1.066 ± 0.137 |
0.256 ± 0.027 | ||||
55 | TktA (tktA) | Metabolism, central intermediary metabolism | Ara + 1 | 0.559 ± 0.049 |
0.996 ± 0.045 | ||||
56 | PykF (pykF) | Metabolism, energy metabolism | Ara − 1(0) | 1.112 ± 0.041 |
OFF | ||||
57 | GuaA (guaA)* | Metabolism, nucleotide biosynthesis | Ara − 1 | 0.996 ± 0.096 |
0.274 ± 0.015 | ||||
58 | PurH (purH) | Metabolism, nucleotide biosynthesis | Ara + 1 | 0.615 ± 0.060 |
0.964 ± 0.120 | ||||
59 | EF-Tu (tufAB)** | Information transfer, translation | Ancg | 2.476 ± 0.163 |
—h | ||||
60 | SodB (sodB)* | Cell processes, adaptation to stress | Ara + 1 | 0.370 ± 0.030 |
1.000 ± 0.039 |
The protein spots M1 and M2 show similar intensities across all genotypes and serve as internal standards for visualization only (Figure 1). Protein spots 1–49 show significant and parallel changes in the two independently evolved clones compared to their ancestor (○ in Figure 1). Protein spots 50–60 show significant changes in only one of the two evolved clones (▵ and ▿ in Figure 1). Some proteins were identified in two different spots; this pattern corresponds to post-translational modifications or to degradation products (in each case, both protein spots showed the same changes in the evolved clones).
Regulation by cAMP–CRP and ppGpp is indicated by “*” and “**,” respectively, for the functionally characterized genes (Cashel et al. 1996 and Salgado et al. 2004 for the table; Man et al. 1997 for serC; Zhang et al. 2005 for sodB; Zheng et al. 2004 for modA, kbl, and leuA; Traxler et al. 2006 for asnS).
Functional groupings of the proteins are shown according to the data from GenProtEC (http://genprotec.mbl.edu).
Anc, expression lower in the ancestor clone; Anc(0), proteins absent from the ancestor but appearing in both evolved clones; Evol, expression lower in both evolved clones; Evol(0), proteins disappearing in both evolved clones; Ara + 1, expression lower than in the ancestor only in the Ara + 1 evolved clone; Ara − 1, expression lower than in the ancestor only in the Ara − 1 evolved clone; Ara − 1(0), protein spot disappearing in the Ara-1 evolved clone.
Quantitative gel analysis was performed using the Melanie II software (Genebio). For every spot, the protein expression of each evolved clone was standardized using the ancestral strain as a reference, after first standardizing for total protein volume over all spots (see materials and methods). For example, a value of 2.0 indicates that the relative abundance of a particular protein spot is twice as high in an evolved clone as in the ancestor, whereas a value of 0.5 indicates that the relative abundance of a protein in the evolved clone is only half that measured in the ancestor. The upper and lower entries for each protein are relative abundances measured in the Ara + 1 and Ara − 1 evolved clones, respectively. Mean values are shown along with standard deviations based on the three independent sets of gels. OFF, protein spots absent in the evolved clones, but present in the ancestor. ON, protein spots absent in the ancestor, but present in the evolved clones.
Based on protein sequence comparisons. A gene name could not be assigned.
ArgT and EF-Tu are significantly higher only in the Ara + 1 evolved clone.
The Melanie II software was unable to quantify the EF-Tu protein spot in the Ara − 1 evolved clone because the spot was fuzzy and precise delineation was impossible for two of the three replicate gels.