Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1997 Aug;9(8):1357–1368. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1357

The Frequency and Degree of Cosuppression by Sense Chalcone Synthase Transgenes Are Dependent on Transgene Promoter Strength and Are Reduced by Premature Nonsense Codons in the Transgene Coding Sequence.

Q Que 1, H Y Wang 1, J J English 1, R A Jorgensen 1
PMCID: PMC157003  PMID: 12237385

Abstract

By comparing the effects of strong and weak promoters that drive sense chalcone synthase (Chs) transgenes in large populations of independently transformed plants, we show here that a strong transgene promoter is required for high-frequency cosuppression of Chs genes and for production of the full range of cosuppression phenotypes. In addition, sense Chs transgenes driven by a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter possessing a single copy of the upstream activator region (UAR) were found to produce a significantly lower degree of cosuppression than they did when the transgene promoter possessed two or four copies of the UAR. It has been shown elsewhere that 35S promoter strength increases with increasing UAR copy number. Frameshift mutations producing early nonsense codons in the Chs transgene were found to reduce the frequency and the degree of cosuppression. These results suggest that promoter strength and transcript stability determine the degree of cosuppression, supporting the hypothesis that sense cosuppression is a response to the accumulation of transcripts at high concentrations. This conclusion was shown to apply to single-copy transgenes but not necessarily to inversely repeated transgenes. The results presented here also have significance for efficient engineering of cosuppression phenotypes for use in research and agriculture.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barettino D., Feigenbutz M., Valcárcel R., Stunnenberg H. G. Improved method for PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):541–542. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron F. H., Jennings P. A. Inhibition of gene expression by a short sense fragment. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 11;19(3):469–475. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty W. G., Parks T. D. Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):399–405. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. English J. J., Mueller E., Baulcombe D. C. Suppression of Virus Accumulation in Transgenic Plants Exhibiting Silencing of Nuclear Genes. Plant Cell. 1996 Feb;8(2):179–188. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fang R. X., Nagy F., Sivasubramaniam S., Chua N. H. Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):141–150. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gubler M., Braguglia D., Meyer J., Piekarowicz A., Bickle T. A. Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):233–240. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05046.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hart C. M., Fischer B., Neuhaus J. M., Meins F., Jr Regulated inactivation of homologous gene expression in transgenic Nicotiana sylvestris plants containing a defense-related tobacco chitinase gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Nov;235(2-3):179–188. doi: 10.1007/BF00279359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hobbs S. L., Warkentin T. D., DeLong C. M. Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression. Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Jan;21(1):17–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00039614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jorgensen R. A. Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression States. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):686–691. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5211.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lanz T., Tropf S., Marner F. J., Schröder J., Schröder G. The role of cysteines in polyketide synthases. Site-directed mutagenesis of resveratrol and chalcone synthases, two key enzymes in different plant-specific pathways. J Biol Chem. 1991 May 25;266(15):9971–9976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindbo J. A., Silva-Rosales L., Proebsting W. M., Dougherty W. G. Induction of a Highly Specific Antiviral State in Transgenic Plants: Implications for Regulation of Gene Expression and Virus Resistance. Plant Cell. 1993 Dec;5(12):1749–1759. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.12.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luzzatto L., Bessler M., Rotoli B. Somatic mutations in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: a blessing in disguise? Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81850-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matzke M. A., Matzke AJM. How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muhlrad D., Decker C. J., Parker R. Deadenylation of the unstable mRNA encoded by the yeast MFA2 gene leads to decapping followed by 5'-->3' digestion of the transcript. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):855–866. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Park Y. D., Papp I., Moscone E. A., Iglesias V. A., Vaucheret H., Matzke A. J., Matzke M. A. Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J. 1996 Feb;9(2):183–194. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.09020183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sijen T., Wellink J., Hiriart J. B., Van Kammen A. RNA-Mediated Virus Resistance: Role of Repeated Transgenes and Delineation of Targeted Regions. Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2277–2294. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith C. J., Watson C. F., Bird C. R., Ray J., Schuch W., Grierson D. Expression of a truncated tomato polygalacturonase gene inhibits expression of the endogenous gene in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Dec;224(3):477–481. doi: 10.1007/BF00262443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vaucheret H., Palauqui J. C., Elmayan T., Moffatt B. Molecular and genetic analysis of nitrite reductase co-suppression in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Aug 21;248(3):311–317. doi: 10.1007/BF02191598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Voelker T. A., Moreno J., Chrispeels M. J. Expression analysis of a pseudogene in transgenic tobacco: a frameshift mutation prevents mRNA accumulation. Plant Cell. 1990 Mar;2(3):255–261. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.3.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Carvalho Niebel F., Frendo P., Van Montagu M., Cornelissen M. Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):347–358. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. van Hoof A., Green P. J. Premature nonsense codons decrease the stability of phytohemagglutinin mRNA in a position-dependent manner. Plant J. 1996 Sep;10(3):415–424. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.10030415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van der Krol A. R., Mur L. A., Beld M., Mol J. N., Stuitje A. R. Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell. 1990 Apr;2(4):291–299. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES