Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1997 Dec;9(12):2135–2142. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.12.2135

Transfer and Integration of T-DNA without Cell Injury in the Host Plant.

J Escudero 1, B Hohn 1
PMCID: PMC157063  PMID: 12237355

Abstract

Agrobacterium colonizes plant cells via a gene transfer mechanism that results in plant tumorigenesis. Virulence (vir) genes are transcriptionally activated in the bacteria by plant metabolites released from the wound site. Hence, it is believed that agrobacteria use injuries to facilitate their entrance into the host plant and that the wounded state is required for plant cell competence for Agrobacterium-mediated gene delivery. However, our experiments using vir gene-activated bacteria sprayed onto tobacco plantlets demonstrated that cells in unwounded plants could also be efficiently transformed. The condition of the plant cells was monitored using [beta]-glucuronidase under the control of a wound-inducible promoter. Infection of leaf tissue is light dependent, and it is drastically reduced when abscisic acid is exogenously applied to the plant. Under these experimental conditions, stomatal opening seems to be used by Agrobacterium to circumvent the physical barrier of the cuticle. These results thus show that the proposed cellular responses evoked by wounding in higher plants are not essential for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cangelosi G. A., Ankenbauer R. G., Nester E. W. Sugars induce the Agrobacterium virulence genes through a periplasmic binding protein and a transmembrane signal protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(17):6708–6712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Escudero J., Neuhaus G., Hohn B. Intracellular Agrobacterium can transfer DNA to the cell nucleus of the host plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):230–234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.1.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farmer E. E., Ryan C. A. Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7713–7716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garfinkel D. J., Simpson R. B., Ream L. W., White F. F., Gordon M. P., Nester E. W. Genetic analysis of crown gall: fine structure map of the T-DNA by site-directed mutagenesis. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):143–153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90368-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keil M., Sánchez-Serrano J. J., Willmitzer L. Both wound-inducible and tuber-specific expression are mediated by the promoter of a single member of the potato proteinase inhibitor II gene family. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1323–1330. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03512.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lippincott B. B., Whatley M. H., Lippincott J. A. Tumor induction by agrobacterium involves attachment of the bacterium to a site on the host plant cell wall. Plant Physiol. 1977 Mar;59(3):388–390. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schultze M., Hohn T., Jiricny J. The reverse transcriptase gene of cauliflower mosaic virus is translated separately from the capsid gene. EMBO J. 1990 Apr;9(4):1177–1185. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08225.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shen W. H., Escudero J., Schläppi M., Ramos C., Hohn B., Koukolíková-Nicola Z. T-DNA transfer to maize cells: histochemical investigation of beta-glucuronidase activity in maize tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1488–1492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stachel S. E., Nester E. W., Zambryski P. C. A plant cell factor induces Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan;83(2):379–383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stachel S. E., Zambryski P. C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the susceptible plant cell: a novel adaptation of extracellular recognition and DNA conjugation. Cell. 1986 Oct 24;47(2):155–157. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90437-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomashow M. F., Karlinsey J. E., Marks J. R., Hurlbert R. E. Identification of a new virulence locus in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that affects polysaccharide composition and plant cell attachment. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jul;169(7):3209–3216. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.7.3209-3216.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vervliet G., Holsters M., Teuchy H., Van Montagu M., Schell J. Characterization of different plaque-forming and defective temperate phages in Agrobacterium. J Gen Virol. 1975 Jan;26(1):33–48. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-26-1-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Winans S. C. Two-way chemical signaling in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. Microbiol Rev. 1992 Mar;56(1):12–31. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.12-31.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zupan J. R., Zambryski P. Transfer of T-DNA from Agrobacterium to the plant cell. Plant Physiol. 1995 Apr;107(4):1041–1047. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES