Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1995 Apr;107(4):1105–1118. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1105

Organ-specific differential regulation of a promoter subfamily for the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit genes in tomato.

I Meier 1, K L Callan 1, A J Fleming 1, W Gruissem 1
PMCID: PMC157243  PMID: 7770521

Abstract

The tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) gene family for the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RBCS) has been investigated to determine the role of promoter regions and DNA-protein interactions in the differential organ-specific transcription of individual genes. Transgenic plants expressing RBCS-promoter-beta-glucuronidase fusion genes have confirmed that promoter fragments ranging from 0.6 to 3.0 kb of the RBCS1, RBCS2, and RBCS3A genes were sufficient to confer the temporal, organ-specific, and differential expression pattern observed for the endogenous genes. The individual temporal and organ-specific beta-glucuronidase enzyme activities closely reflect the qualitative and quantitative transcription activities of the respective RBCS genes, including the strongly reduced activity of RBCS3A (L.A. Wanner, W. Gruissem [1991] Plant Cell 3: 1289-1303). In particular, tissue-specific activity of all three promoters is similar in developing fruit, with high activity in the locular tissue and extremely reduced activity in the pericarp. This specific pattern of gene activity was further substantiated by in situ analysis of RBCS mRNA levels. Together, the data suggest an interesting correlation between RBCS gene activity and sink strength in different fruit tissues. DNA-protein interaction studies have revealed a novel fruit-specific DNA-binding protein called FBF that specifically interacts with a sequence element directly upstream of the G-box in the RBCS3A promoter. FBF binding thus correlates with the reduced activity of this promoter in developing tomato fruit, rendering it a candidate for a fruit-specific negative regulator of transcription in tomato.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ballas N., Wong L. M., Theologis A. Identification of the auxin-responsive element, AuxRE, in the primary indoleacetic acid-inducible gene, PS-IAA4/5, of pea (Pisum sativum). J Mol Biol. 1993 Oct 20;233(4):580–596. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartholomew D. M., Bartley G. E., Scolnik P. A. Abscisic Acid Control of rbcS and cab Transcription in Tomato Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1991 May;96(1):291–296. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.1.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borello U., Ceccarelli E., Giuliano G. Constitutive, light-responsive and circadian clock-responsive factors compete for the different l box elements in plant light-regulated promoters. Plant J. 1993 Oct;4(4):611–619. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04040611.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coruzzi G., Broglie R., Edwards C., Chua N. H. Tissue-specific and light-regulated expression of a pea nuclear gene encoding the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1671–1679. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02031.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean C., Favreau M., Dunsmuir P., Bedbrook J. Confirmation of the relative expression levels of the Petunia (Mitchell) rbcS genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jun 11;15(11):4655–4668. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.11.4655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donald R. G., Cashmore A. R. Mutation of either G box or I box sequences profoundly affects expression from the Arabidopsis rbcS-1A promoter. EMBO J. 1990 Jun;9(6):1717–1726. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08295.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleming A. J., Mandel T., Roth I., Kuhlemeier C. The patterns of gene expression in the tomato shoot apical meristem. Plant Cell. 1993 Mar;5(3):297–309. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.3.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fluhr Robert, Moses Phyllis, Morelli Giorgio, Coruzzi Gloria, Chua Nam-Hai. Expression dynamics of the pea rbcS multigene family and organ distribution of the transcripts. EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2063–2071. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04467.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilmartin P. M., Sarokin L., Memelink J., Chua N. H. Molecular light switches for plant genes. Plant Cell. 1990 May;2(5):369–378. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giuliano G., Pichersky E., Malik V. S., Timko M. P., Scolnik P. A., Cashmore A. R. An evolutionarily conserved protein binding sequence upstream of a plant light-regulated gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(19):7089–7093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guiltinan M. J., Marcotte W. R., Jr, Quatrano R. S. A plant leucine zipper protein that recognizes an abscisic acid response element. Science. 1990 Oct 12;250(4978):267–271. doi: 10.1126/science.2145628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jefferson R. A., Kavanagh T. A., Bevan M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3901–3907. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuhlemeier C., Strittmatter G., Ward K., Chua N. H. The Pea rbcS-3A Promoter Mediates Light Responsiveness but not Organ Specificity. Plant Cell. 1989 Apr;1(4):471–478. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.4.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loake G. J., Faktor O., Lamb C. J., Dixon R. A. Combination of H-box [CCTACC(N)7CT] and G-box (CACGTG) cis elements is necessary for feed-forward stimulation of a chalcone synthase promoter by the phenylpropanoid-pathway intermediate p-coumaric acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):9230–9234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manzara T., Carrasco P., Gruissem W. Developmental and organ-specific changes in promoter DNA-protein interactions in the tomato rbcS gene family. Plant Cell. 1991 Dec;3(12):1305–1316. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.12.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meier I., Gruissem W. Novel conserved sequence motifs in plant G-box binding proteins and implications for interactive domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):470–478. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Montgomery J., Pollard V., Deikman J., Fischer R. L. Positive and negative regulatory regions control the spatial distribution of polygalacturonase transcription in tomato fruit pericarp. Plant Cell. 1993 Sep;5(9):1049–1062. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.9.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oeda K., Salinas J., Chua N. H. A tobacco bZip transcription activator (TAF-1) binds to a G-box-like motif conserved in plant genes. EMBO J. 1991 Jul;10(7):1793–1802. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07704.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salanoubat M., Belliard G. The steady-state level of potato sucrose synthase mRNA is dependent on wounding, anaerobiosis and sucrose concentration. Gene. 1989 Dec 7;84(1):181–185. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90153-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schulze-Lefert P., Dangl J. L., Becker-André M., Hahlbrock K., Schulz W. Inducible in vivo DNA footprints define sequences necessary for UV light activation of the parsley chalcone synthase gene. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):651–656. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03422.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shaffer C. D., Wallrath L. L., Elgin S. C. Regulating genes by packaging domains: bits of heterochromatin in euchromatin? Trends Genet. 1993 Feb;9(2):35–37. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90171-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sheen J. Metabolic repression of transcription in higher plants. Plant Cell. 1990 Oct;2(10):1027–1038. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.10.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Silverthorne J., Tobin E. M. Post-transcriptional regulation of organ-specific expression of individual rbcS mRNAs in Lemna gibba. Plant Cell. 1990 Dec;2(12):1181–1190. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.12.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Silverthorne J., Wimpee C. F., Yamada T., Rolfe S. A., Tobin E. M. Differential expression of individual genes encoding the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in Lemna gibba. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 Jul;15(1):49–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00017723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sugita M., Gruissem W. Developmental, organ-specific, and light-dependent expression of the tomato ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7104–7108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sugita M., Manzara T., Pichersky E., Cashmore A., Gruissem W. Genomic organization, sequence analysis and expression of all five genes encoding the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from tomato. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Sep;209(2):247–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00329650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Haaren M. J., Houck C. M. A functional map of the fruit-specific promoter of the tomato 2A11 gene. Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Feb;21(4):625–640. doi: 10.1007/BF00014546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Haaren M. J., Houck C. M. Strong negative and positive regulatory elements contribute to the high-level fruit-specific expression of the tomato 2A11 gene. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Oct;17(4):615–630. doi: 10.1007/BF00037048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang F., Smith A. G., Brenner M. L. Temporal and Spatial Expression Pattern of Sucrose Synthase during Tomato Fruit Development. Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):535–540. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wanner L. A., Gruissem W. Expression dynamics of the tomato rbcS gene family during development. Plant Cell. 1991 Dec;3(12):1289–1303. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.12.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weisshaar B., Armstrong G. A., Block A., da Costa e Silva O., Hahlbrock K. Light-inducible and constitutively expressed DNA-binding proteins recognizing a plant promoter element with functional relevance in light responsiveness. EMBO J. 1991 Jul;10(7):1777–1786. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07702.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES