Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1995 Jun;108(2):727–734. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.727

Effect of pH and calcium on short-term NO3- fluxes in roots of barley seedlings.

M Aslam 1, R L Travis 1, R C Huffaker 1
PMCID: PMC157394  PMID: 11536695

Abstract

The effect of pH and Ca2+ on net NO3- uptake, influx, and efflux by intact roots of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedlings was studied. Seedlings were induced with NO3- or NO2-. Net NO3- uptake and efflux, respectively, were determined by following its depletion from, and accumulation in, the external solution. Since roots of both uninduced and NO2(-)-induced seedlings contain little internal NO3- initial net uptake rates are equivalent to influx (M. Aslam, R.L. Travis, R.C. Huffaker [1994] Plant Physiol 106: 1293-1301). NO3-, uptake (influx) by these roots was little affected at acidic pH. In contrast, in NO3(-)-induced roots, which accumulate NO3-, net uptake rates decreased in response to acidic pH. Under these conditions, NO3- efflux was stimulated and was a function of root NO3- concentration. Conversely, at basic pH, NO3- uptake by NO3- and NO2(-)-induced and uninduced roots decreased, apparently because of the inhibition of influx. Calcium had little effect on NO3- uptake (influx) by NO2(-)-induced roots at either pH 3 or 6. However, in NO3(-)-induced roots, lack of Ca2+ at pH 3 significantly decreased net NO3- uptake and stimulated efflux. The results indicate that at acidic pH the decrease in net NO3- uptake is due to the stimulation of efflux, whereas at basic pH, it is due to the inhibition of influx.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (753.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aslam M., Huffaker R. C., Rains D. W., Rao K. P. Influence of light and ambient carbon dioxide concentration on nitrate assimilation by intact barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jun;63(6):1205–1209. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.6.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aslam M., Travis R. L., Huffaker R. C. Comparative Induction of Nitrate and Nitrite Uptake and Reduction Systems by Ambient Nitrate and Nitrite in Intact Roots of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1993 Jul;102(3):811–819. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.3.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslam M., Travis R. L., Huffaker R. C. Stimulation of Nitrate and Nitrite Efflux by Ammonium in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1994 Dec;106(4):1293–1301. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.4.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christiansen M. N., Carns H. R., Slyter D. J. Stimulation of Solute Loss from Radicles of Gossypium hirsutum L. by Chilling, Anaerobiosis, and Low pH. Plant Physiol. 1970 Jul;46(1):53–56. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deane-Drummond C. E., Glass A. D. Short Term Studies of Nitrate Uptake into Barley Plants Using Ion-Specific Electrodes and ClO(3): II. Regulation of NO(3) Efflux by NH(4). Plant Physiol. 1983 Sep;73(1):105–110. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elliott G. C., Lynch J., Läuchli A. Influx and efflux of p in roots of intact maize plants : double-labeling with p and p. Plant Physiol. 1984 Oct;76(2):336–341. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.2.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Epstein E. The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport by plant cells. Plant Physiol. 1961 Jul;36(4):437–444. doi: 10.1104/pp.36.4.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leggett J. E., Epstein E. Kinetics of Sulfate Absorption by Barley Roots. Plant Physiol. 1956 May;31(3):222–226. doi: 10.1104/pp.31.3.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McClure P. R., Kochian L. V., Spanswick R. M., Shaff J. E. Evidence for Cotransport of Nitrate and Protons in Maize Roots : II. Measurement of NO(3) and H Fluxes with Ion-Selective Microelectrodes. Plant Physiol. 1990 May;93(1):290–294. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.1.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rao K. P., Rains D. W. Nitrate absorption by barley: I. Kinetics and energetics. Plant Physiol. 1976 Jan;57(1):55–58. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rickauer M., Tanner W. Effects of Ca on Amino Acid Transport and Accumulation in Roots of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1986 Sep;82(1):41–46. doi: 10.1104/pp.82.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmidt C., Schroeder J. I. Anion Selectivity of Slow Anion Channels in the Plasma Membrane of Guard Cells (Large Nitrate Permeability). Plant Physiol. 1994 Sep;106(1):383–391. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.1.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith I. K. Role of calcium in serine transport into tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 1978 Dec;62(6):941–948. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.6.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ullrich C. I., Novacky A. J. Extra- and Intracellular pH and Membrane Potential Changes Induced by K, Cl, H(2)PO(4), and NO(3) Uptake and Fusicoccin in Root Hairs of Limnobium stoloniferum. Plant Physiol. 1990 Dec;94(4):1561–1567. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.4.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ward M. R., Aslam M., Huffaker R. C. Enhancement of nitrate uptake and growth of barley seedlings by calcium under saline conditions. Plant Physiol. 1986 Jan;80(1):520–524. doi: 10.1104/pp.80.2.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES