Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2004 Sep 27;143(5):638–648. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705951

G protein activation and cyclic AMP modulation by naloxone benzoylhydrazone in distinct layers of rat olfactory bulb

Pierluigi Onali 1,*, Maria C Olianas 1
PMCID: PMC1575427  PMID: 15451772

Abstract

  1. Naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzoH) has initially been developed as an agonist of the pharmacologically defined κ3-opioid receptor and has recently been employed as an antagonist at the opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor. In the present study, we investigated the ability of NalBzoH to elicit agonist-like effects on receptor signalling in distinct layers of rat olfactory bulb, a brain region where we have demonstrated the presence of opioid and ORL1 receptors coupled to both stimulation and inhibition of cyclic AMP formation.

  2. In membranes of the olfactory nerve-glomerular layer (ON-GL), external plexiform layer (EPL) and granule cell layer (GRL), NalBzoH elicited a concentration-dependent stimulation of guanosine-5′-O-(3-[35S]-thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding with pEC50 values ranging from 7.36 to 7.86, whereas the κ1-opioid receptor agonists (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 were inactive.

  3. In membranes of GRL, but not ON-GL and EPL, NalBzoH stimulated basal adenylyl cyclase activity by 40% with a pEC50 of 8.14, and significantly potentiated the net enzyme stimulation elicited by corticotropin-releasing hormone and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide 38. Pertussis toxin prevented the NalBzoH stimulations of [35S]GTPγS binding and adenylyl cyclase activity.

  4. In membranes of EPL and GRL, but not ON-GL, NalBzoH elicited a concentration-dependent inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with pEC50 values of 8.07 and 8.08, respectively.

  5. At concentrations that completely blocked the actions of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), the ORL1 receptor antagonists CompB and [Nphe1]N/OFQ(1–13)NH2 failed to antagonize either the stimulatory or the inhibitory effect of NalBzoH on cyclic AMP formation. Similarly, the κ1-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine counteracted the NalBzoH effects with relatively low potencies (pKi values=7.67–8.09).

  6. Conversely, the selective δ-opioid receptor antagonist TIPP (pKi=9.10) and the selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP (pKi=8.27) reduced the inhibitory effect of NalBzoH by 70 and 30%, respectively. Moreover, TIPP and CTAP potently inhibited the NalBzoH stimulation of cyclic AMP, each antagonist maximally causing 50% blockade of the agonist response.

  7. These data demonstrate that in the olfactory bulb NalBzoH activates receptor signalling by acting through δ- and μ-opioid receptors and independently of ORL1 and κ1-opioid receptors.

Keywords: Opioid receptors, ORL1 receptor, naloxone benzoylhydrazone, [35S]GTPγS binding, adenylyl cyclase, olfactory bulb

Introduction

Naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzoH) is a naloxone derivative that acts on opioid receptors with a complex pharmacological profile. Early studies in vivo showed that NalBzoH potently antagonized morphine-induced analgesia and, at higher doses, caused analgesia independently of μ-, δ-, and κ1-opioid receptors and through the activation of a novel subtype of κ-opioid receptor, termed κ3 (Paul et al., 1990). Accordingly, radioligand-binding studies identified the occurrence of three distinct κ-opioid receptor subtypes, termed κ1, κ2 and κ3, and showed that [3H]NalBzoH labeled the κ3 subtype with high affinity (Clark et al., 1989; Cheng et al., 1992; Berzetei-Gurske et al., 1995). The κ3-opioid receptor subtype was characterized as being relatively insensitive to both κ1-opioid receptor agonists, such as U-50,488 and U-69,593, and the κ1-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) (Clark et al., 1989; Cheng et al., 1992; Berzetei-Gurske et al., 1995). Moreover, functional studies demonstrated that NalBzoH behaved as a potent antagonist at the μ-opioid receptor (Dunnill et al., 1996; Brown & Pasternak, 1998), whereas it acted as an agonist at κ3-opioid receptors expressed in BE(2)-C and SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell lines (Standifer et al., 1994; Cheng et al., 1995). However, so far a single gene for each opioid receptor subtype has been identified and the pharmacological profile of the cloned κ receptor corresponds to that of the putative κ1 receptor subtype (Dhawan et al., 1996). Thus, the molecular nature of the putative κ3-opioid receptor subtype is still obscure. In the attempt to isolate the gene for the κ3-opioid receptor subtype, Pan et al. (1995) reported the identification of a cDNA clone, termed KOR3, which was found to correspond to the mouse homologue of the human opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptor for the endogenous peptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) (Meunier et al., 1995; Reinscheid et al., 1995; Mogil & Pasternak, 2001). When transfected in host cells, the ORL1 receptor displayed pharmacological properties distinct from that of the cloned opioid receptor subtypes and from the pharmacologically defined κ3-opioid subtype (Calo' et al., 2000b; Mogil & Pasternak, 2001). Nonetheless, a number of studies have shown that NalBzoH is a ligand of the ORL1 receptor, behaving either as a potent N/OFQ antagonist or partial agonist (Dunnill et al., 1996; Abdulla & Smith, 1997; Nabeshima et al., 1999; Chiou, 2001; Bigoni et al., 2002). Moreover, behavioural studies in mice have shown that NalBzoH antagonized the hyperalgesic effect of N/OFQ, and that the antinociceptive effect of NalBzoH was lost in mice made deficient of ORL1 receptor, suggesting that blockade of ORL1 receptor, rather than stimulation of κ3 opioid receptor, mediates the action of NalBzoH (Noda et al., 1998). On the other hand, in neuroblastoma BE(2)-C cell line, pharmacological and antisense mapping data showed that NalBzoH can inhibit cyclic AMP formation independently of ORL1 receptor activation, thus providing support to the idea that in this cell system the receptor mechanism of NalBzoH and N/OFQ are distinct (Mathis et al., 2001).

We have previously shown that in rat olfactory bulb, activation of μ and δ opioid and ORL1 receptors exerts a bimodal control of cyclic AMP formation, causing stimulation of basal and neurotransmitter-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities and inhibition of forskolin (FSK)- and Ca2+/calmodulin-stimulated enzyme activities (Olianas & Onali, 1992; 1994; Onali et al., 2001). Evidence has been provided indicating that these opposite effects on cyclic AMP are mediated through the βγ subunits of G proteins of the Gi/Go type (Olianas & Onali, 1999), which differentially affect the activity of Ca2+-insensitive and Ca2+-sensitive isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (Sunahara et al., 1996). In the course of these studies, we noticed that NalBzoH was able to exert agonist effects on receptor signalling, which were similar to those elicited by N/OFQ and μ- and δ-opioid receptor agonists.

In the present study, we show that NalBzoH causes G protein activation and modulates adenylyl cyclase activity in tissue membranes of specific layers of the rat main olfactory bulb. Moreover, by using selective receptor agonists and antagonists, we demonstrate that NalBzoH acts independently of ORL1 and κ1-opioid receptors and exerts its agonist activity through the stimulation of δ- and μ-opioid receptors.

Methods

Tissue dissection and membrane preparation

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (200–300 g) were used. Animals were maintained in a 12 h light/dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. Experiments were performed according to the principles of laboratory animal care (Law on animal experiments in Italy, D.L. 116/92). Rats were killed by decapitation and tissue dissections were performed as previously described (Onali et al., 2001). Briefly, with the use of a tissue slicer, the olfactory bulbs were cut in coronal sections (300 μm thick), which were kept in an ice-cold phosphate- buffered saline (PBS) solution. With the aid of a stereoscopic microscope equipped with a diascopic illuminator base, the bulb layers were clearly identified on the basis of their characteristic cytoarchitecture and each slice was free-hand dissected into three portions: the olfactory nerve-glomerular layer (ON-GL); the external plexiform layer including the mitral cell layer (EPL); the granule cell layer (GRL). ON-GL was microdissected by making a cut along the border between this layer and EPL, whereas EPL was separated from GRL by cutting along the deep part of the mitral cell layer. The tissue layers from individual slices were pooled and homogenized in an ice-cold buffer containing 10 mM HEPES–NaOH, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2 (pH 7.40) using a Teflon-glass tissue grinder. The homogenate was centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in the same buffer at a protein concentration of 0.8–1.0 mg ml−1 and either stored at −80°C for binding assays or used immediately for adenylyl cyclase assays. Striatal tissue (dorsal striatum) was microdissected from 300 μm thick coronal slices of a brain tissue block obtained by performing a first transverse cut just anterior to the olfactory tubercle and a second transverse cut at the level of the median eminence. Tissue from five to six sections was collected and membranes were prepared as described for the olfactory bulb. For each experiment, a fresh tissue preparation was used.

Assay of [35S]GTPγS binding

Tissue membranes were diluted in 10 mM HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4) and 1 mM EDTA, centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C and resuspended in the same buffer. The binding of [35S]GTPγS was assayed in a reaction mixture (final volume 100 μl) containing 25 mM HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM KCl, 50 μM GDP and 1.0 nM [35S]GTPγS. KCl was used instead of NaCl as preliminary experiments indicated that, while equally effective in reducing basal [35S]GTPγS binding, KCl allowed a higher receptor-mediated stimulation than NaCl. The incubation was started by the addition of the membrane suspension (5–8 μg of protein) and was carried out at 30°C for 60 min. The incubation was terminated by adding 5 ml of ice-cold buffer containing 10 mM HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4) and 1 mM MgCl2, immediately followed by rapid filtration on glass fibre filters presoaked in the same buffer. The filters were washed twice with 5 ml of buffer and the radioactivity trapped was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 100 μM GTPγS. Assays were performed in duplicate.

To investigate the reversibility of NalBzoH stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding, time-course experiments were performed. Tissue membranes were preincubated for 10 min at 30°C with vehicle or 100 nM NalBzoH. At time 0, reaction was started by the addition of [35S]GTPγS (final concentration 1 nM) and stopped at 2 min intervals for the following 20 min. Naloxone (final concentration 10 μM) was added to either vehicle- or NalBzoH-treated samples 6 min after the beginning of the reaction.

Protein content was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.

Adenylyl cyclase assay

Adenylyl cyclase activity was assayed in a 100 μl reaction mixture containing 50 mM HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4), 2.3 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM [α-32P]ATP (50–70 c.p.m. pmol−1), 0.5 mM [3H]cyclic AMP (80 c.p.m. nmol−1), 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 5 mM phosphocreatine, 50 U ml−1 creatine phosphokinase, 100 μM GTP, 50 μg of BSA, 10 μg of bacitracin, 10 μM bestatin and 10 kallikrein inhibitor units of aprotinin. When forskolin (FSK) was used, it was added to the reaction mixture at the final concentration of 10 μM. The reaction was started by adding the tissue preparation (30–40 μg of protein) and was carried out at 30°C for 10 min. When the effect of the GDP-bound form of the α subunit of transducin (αTGDP) was investigated, 10 μl of tissue membranes (10–15 μg of protein) were preincubated with an equal volume of a solution containing either 2 μg of αTGDP (kindly donated by Dr H.E. Hamm, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.) or vehicle at 4°C for 60–80 min. Thereafter, NalBzoH or vehicle was added (10 μl) immediately followed by the addition of the reaction mixture (20 μl). The incubation was carried out for 10 min at 30°C. Cyclic AMP was isolated by sequential chromatography on Dowex and alumina columns as described by Salomon et al. (1974). The recovery of [32P]cyclic AMP from each sample was calculated on the basis of the recovery of [3H]cyclic AMP. Assays were carried out in duplicate.

Intracerebral injection of pertussis toxin (PTX)

PTX (Sigma RBI) dissolved in a vehicle containing 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer and 250 mM NaCl (pH 7.0) was stereotaxically injected into the right olfactory bulb at two positions (total amount of 3.5 μg in 7 μl), as previously described (Olianas & Onali, 1994). The control animals were injected with an equal volume of vehicle containing 3.5 μg of BSA. The rats were killed 60–68 h after surgery and olfactory bulb from vehicle- and toxin-injected animals were microdissected and tissue membranes were prepared as described above. Three tissue preparations were tested.

Materials

[α-32P]ATP (30–40 Ci mmol−1), [2,8-3H]cyclic AMP (25 Ci mmol−1) and [35S]GTPγS (1306 Ci mmol−1) were from Perkin-Elmer-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA, U.S.A.). N/OFQ and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) (human, rat) were from Neosystem (Strasbourg, France). [Nphe1]N/OFQ(1–13)NH2 (Nphe) and CompB (1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzamidazol-2-one) were kindly provided by Drs. G. Calo' (University of Ferrara, Italy) and S. Ozaki (Banyu Tsukuba Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan), respectively. Deltorphin I, (N-Me-Phe3,D-Pro4)-casomorphin (1–4) amide (PL017), TIPP and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38 (PACAP 38) were obtained from Bachem AG (Bubendorf, Switzerland). FSK and GTPγS were from Calbiochem, (San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) and Boehringer (Mannheim, Germany), respectively. (−)-U-50,488 hydrochloride (trans-(−)3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeneacetamide hydrochloride), nor-BNI dihydrochloride and CTAP were from Tocris Cookson Ltd (U.K.). NalBzoH, U-69,593 ((5α, 7α, 8β)-(−)-N-methyl-N-(7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro(4-5)dec-8-yl)benzeneacetamide), aprotinin, bestatin, bacitracin and the other reagents were from Sigma RBI (St Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Naloxone hydrochloride was obtained from Salars (Como, Italy).

Statistical analysis

Results are reported as means±s.e.m. Data from agonist concentration–response curves were analysed by a least-squares curve fitting computer programme (Graph Pad Prism, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). Agonist concentration producing half-maximal effect (EC50 values) were converted to the logarithmic form (pEC50=negative logarithm of EC50) as these values are log-normally distributed (Fleming et al., 1972). Antagonist potencies were determined in experiments where the compounds were examined for their ability to reverse the agonist effect in a concentration-dependent manner. The data were analysed as competition curves by nonlinear regression analysis, and the antagonist inhibitory constant (Ki) was calculated according to the Cheng–Prusoff equation (Cheng & Prusoff, 1973). In a limited number of experiments involving the antagonism of (−)-U-50,488 by nor-BNI in rat striatum, the effect of a fixed concentration of antagonist on the agonist concentration response curves was examined and the Ki value was determined according to the equation EC50b=EC50a (1+I/Ki), where EC50a and EC50b are the agonist concentrations producing half-maximal effects in the absence and in the presence of the antagonist and I is the antagonist concentration. Ki values were converted to the logarithmic form (pKi). Statistically significant differences between concentration–response curves were determined by two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Statistical significance of the difference between means was determined by Student's t-test.

Results

Effects on [35S]GTPγS binding

In ON-GL, EPL and GRL membranes, NalBzoH elicited a concentration-dependent stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding to membrane G proteins with pEC50 values of 7.36±0.08, 7.80±0.04 and 7.86±0.05, respectively, and maximal effects corresponding to 19.4±2.0% (P<0.05, n=3), 99.8±3.2% (P<0.01, n=3) and 59.5±2.1% (P<0.01, n=3) increase of basal values, respectively (Figure 1). For comparison, we examined the effects of other opioid receptor agonists under the same experimental conditions used for NalBzoH. In ON-GL membranes, the ORL1 agonist N/OFQ (pEC50=8.78±0.06) and the selective μ-opioid receptor agonist PL017 (Chang et al., 1983) (pEC50=6.18±0.07) maximally stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding by 25.0±3 and 37.9±4%, respectively (P<0.01) (Figure 1). The selective δ-opioid receptor agonist deltorphin I ***(Erspamer et al., 1989) and the κ1-opioid receptor agonists (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 (Clark et al., 1989; Remmers et al., 1999), tested at the same concentrations of NalBzoH, failed to significantly affect [35S]GTPγS binding. In EPL membranes, N/OFQ (pEC50=8.35±0.03), PL017 (pEC50=6.28±0.05) and deltorphin I (pEC50=8.47±0.04) increased the binding of [35S]GTPγS by 80.1±3.0, 81.9±2.8 and 219.8±8.2%, respectively. Similar results were obtained in GRL membranes, where deltorphin I was the most effective (175.1±5.7% increase, pEC50=8.37±0.05), followed by PL017 (74.0±3.0% increase, pEC50=6.36±0.04) and N/OFQ (52.0±4.0% increase, pEC50=8.64±0.05). As in ON-GL membranes, (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 were found to be inactive in these tissue layer preparations (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Concentration-dependent effects of NalBzoH and other opioid receptor agonists on [35S]GTPγS binding in ON-GL, EPL and GRL membranes. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

Time-course experiments indicated that in EPL membranes preincubated for 10 min with 100 nN NalBzoH, there was a rapid stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding which was evident 2 min after the addition of the radioligand (the earliest time point investigated) and linear with time for at least 20 min. Under these conditions, NalBzoH increased the rate of [35S]GTPγS binding by about two-fold when compared to basal rate. The addition of the nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (final concentration 10 μM) 6 min after the beginning of the reaction caused a rapid reversal of the NalBzoH stimulation, decreasing the binding rate to basal value (results not shown).

Effects on basal adenylyl cyclase activity

NalBzoH failed to affect basal adenylyl cyclase activity of ON-GL and EPL membranes (results not shown), whereas it caused a concentration-dependent increase of cyclic AMP formation in GRL membranes (Figure 2). The pEC50 value was 8.14±0.05 and the maximal stimulation corresponded to 40.6±3.6% (P<0.01, n=8) increase of basal activity. In the same tissue layer, N/OFQ (pEC50=8.34±0.06, n=6), deltorphin I (pEC50=8.10±0.04, n=3) and PL017 (pEC50=6.50±0.10, n=3) increased cyclic AMP formation by 36.0±4.0, 71.5±5.0 and 34.4±4.3%, respectively (P<0.01) (Figure 2). In EPL membranes, deltorphin I, but not PL017 and N/OFQ, stimulated basal adenylyl cyclase activity by 42.5±3.5% (n=5, P<0.01). In ON-GL membranes, both deltorphin I and PL017 were without effect, whereas N/OFQ inhibited the cyclic AMP formation by 19.6±3% (n=3, P<0.05) (results not shown). (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 failed to affect basal adenylyl cyclase activity in GRL (Figure 2) and the other tissue layers (results not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Concentration-dependent effects of NalBzoH and other opioid receptor agonists on basal adenylyl cyclase activity in GRL membranes. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three to eight experiments.

Effects of PTX and αTGDP

In GRL membranes prepared from olfactory bulbs injected with PTX in vivo, NalBzoH (1 μM) failed to stimulate either [35S]GTPγS binding or adenylyl cyclase activity, while it elicited significant responses in membranes obtained from vehicle-treated bulbs (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of NalBzoH (1 μM) on [35S]GTPγS binding (upper panel) and basal adenylyl cyclase activity (lower panel) in GRL membranes of olfactory bulb treated in vivo with either pertussis toxin (PTX) or vehicle (control). Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments carried out on three distinct tissue preparations. *P<0.05; aP>0.05 vs basal.

Preincubation. of GRL membranes with αTGDP, a scavenger of βγ subunits (Federman et al., 1992), completely blocked the stimulatory effect of NalBzoH and reduced basal adenylyl cyclase activity by 18%. Enzyme activity values (expressed as pmol of cyclic AMP min−1 mg protein±s.e.m., n=3) were: basal 98.2±4.1, NalBzoH (1 μM) 133.8±5.0 (P<0.01 vs basal), αTGDP (2 μg) 80.8±3.4 (P<0.05 vs basal), αTGDP + NalBzoH 85.2±5.6 (P>0.05 vs αTGDP alone).

Effects of NalBzoH on neurotransmitter-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity

In GRL membranes, the neuropeptides CRH (pEC50=7.51±0.08) and PACAP 38 (pEC50=9.52±0.06) maximally stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity by 35.2±3 and 265±10%, respectively. The coaddition of NalBzoH (1 μM) significantly enhanced the net enzyme stimulations elicited by CRH and PACAP 38 by 45.4±3.0 and 31.0±3.0% (P<0.05) without significantly changing the potencies of the neuropeptides (pEC50 values were 7.46±0.06 and 9.62±0.08, respectively) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of NalBzoH (1 μM) on CRH (upper panel)- and PACAP 38 (lower panel)-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities in GRL membranes. The enzyme activity was assayed at the indicated concentrations of the neuropeptides in the presence of either vehicle or NalBzoH. Values indicate the net enzyme activities stimulated by either CRH or PACAP 38 above control activities and are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments. Control activities (expressed as pmol of cyclic AMP min−1 mg protein −1) were: vehicle 124±5, 1 μM NalBzoH 168±7. The CRH and PACAP 38 concentration–response curves in the presence of NalBzoH were significantly different from those in the presence of vehicle (P<0.05 by analysis of variance).

Effects on FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity

NalBzoH failed to affect FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in ON-GL membranes (results not shown), but significantly inhibited the enzyme activity in EPL (pEC50=8.07.±0.05, maximal inhibition=22.1±1.4%, P<0.05) and in GRL membranes (pEC50=8.08±0.08, maximal inhibition=23.3±3.0%, P<0.05) (Figure 5). With regard to the effects of other opioid receptor agonists, in ON-GL membranes, deltorphin I (0.1 nM–1.0 μM), PL017 (10 nM–100 μM) failed to affect the FSK-stimulated cyclic AMP formation, whereas N/OFQ caused a significant inhibitory effect (16.4±2.0% reduction, P<0.05, n=3) with a pEC50 of 8.80±0.05 (results not shown). In EPL and GRL membranes, a concentration-dependent inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was elicited by deltorphin I (27±3 and 32±4% reduction, P<0.01, n=3; pEC50 values=8.67±0.04 and 8.40±0.03, respectively), PL017 (20±2 and 26±4% reduction, P<0.05, n=3; pEC50 values=6.42±0.07 and 6.47±0.05, respectively) and N/OFQ (33±4 and 22±2% reduction, P<0.01, n=3; pEC50 values=8.69±0.04 and 8.50±0.06, respectively) (Figure 5). In contrast, (−)-U-50,488 (1 μM) failed to significantly affect FSK-stimulated enzyme activity in each layer (results not shown). On the other hand, in striatal membranes, (−)-U-50,488 caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with an pEC50 of 7.79±0.05 and a maximal effect corresponding to 20.2±1.9% decrease of control activity (P<0.05, n=3) (results not shown).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Concentration-dependent inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities in EPL and GRL membranes by NalBzoH and other opioid receptor agonists. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

Effects of receptor antagonists

In EPL membranes, addition of increasing concentrations of the selective ORL1 receptor antagonist CompB (Ozaki et al., 2000) failed to affect the NalBzoH inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, while it completely antagonized the inhibitory effect of N/OFQ with a pKi of 9.05 (Figure 6, upper panel and Table 1). Similarly, in GRL membranes, CompB was without effect on the cyclase stimulation by NalBzoH, but potently blocked the action of N/OFQ (Figure 6, lower panel and Table 1). Nphe (1 nM–1 μM), another selective ORL1 antagonist (Calo' et al., 2000a), behaved similarly to CompB (Table 1).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of increasing concentrations of CompB on NalBzoH (1 μM)- and N/OFQ (1 μM)-induced inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in EPL membranes and on NalBzoH (1 μM)- and N/OFQ (1 μM)-induced stimulation of basal enzyme activity in GRL membranes. Control samples were incubated with vehicle. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

Table 1.

Potencies of opioid receptor antagonists (pKi values) in counteracting agonist modulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in distinct layers of rat olfactory bulb

  NalBzoH Deltorphin I PL017 N/OFQ
Inhibiton of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in EPL
CompB >5.5 N.T. N.T. 9.05±0.06
Nphe >6.0 N.T. N.T. 8.81±0.05
nor-BNI 7.67±0.05 7.65±0.04 7.58±0.06 >6.0
CTAP 8.27±0.09 >5.0 8.54±0.07 N.T.
TIPP 9.27±0.04 9.07±0.03 >5.0 N.T.
Stimulation of basal adenylyl cyclase in GRL
CompB >6.0 N.T. N.T. 8.98±0.05
Nphe >6.0 N.T. N.T. 8.74±0.06
nor-BNI 8.09±0.07 7.81±0.05 8.07±0.03 >6.0
CTAP 8.37±0.10 >5.0 8.72±0.09 N.T.
TIPP 9.10±0.09 8.85±0.08 >5.0 N.T.

N.T., not tested; pKi values were calculated from antagonist competition curves according to Cheng & Prusoff (1973). Data are the mean±s.e.m. of three determinations.

The selective δ-opioid receptor antagonist TIPP (Schiller et al., 1992) maximally reduced the adenylyl cyclase inhibitory effect of 1 μM NalBzoH by 70±3% with a pKi value of 9.27 (Figure 7, upper panel). TIPP completely antagonized the inhibition by deltorphin I with a similar potency (Table 1), while it was inactive on the PL017-induced inhibition (Figure 7, upper panel). In GRL membranes (Figure 7, lower panel), TIPP reduced the NalBzoH stimulation by 50±2% with a pKi of 9.10 and completely blocked the deltorphin I stimulation, while having no effect on PL017 stimulation (Table 1).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effects of increasing concentrations of TIPP on NalBzoH (1 μM)-, deltorphin I (1 μM)- and PL017 (50 μM)-induced inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in EPL membranes and on NalBzoH (1 μM)- and deltorphin I (1 μM)-induced stimulation of basal enzyme activity in GRL membranes. Control samples were incubated with vehicle. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

The μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP (Pelton et al., 1986) yielded a 30±3 and 47±4% blockade of the NalBzoH inhibitory and stimulatory effect, respectively, with pKi values similar to those displayed in antagonizing the PL017 effects (Figure 8 and Table 1). At the concentrations used, CTAP had no effect on deltorphin I.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effects of increasing concentrations of CTAP on NalBzoH (1 μM)-, deltorphin I (0.1 μM)- and PL017 (30 μM)-induced inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in EPL membranes and on NalBzoH (0.1 μM)-, deltorphin I (0.1 μM)- and PL017 (30 μM)-induced stimulation of basal enzyme activity in GRL membranes. Control samples were incubated with vehicle. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

The κ1-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI (Takemori et al., 1988; Remmers et al., 1999) completely reversed the NalBzoH-induced adenylyl cyclase inhibition in EPL and stimulation in GRL membranes with pKi values of 7.67 and 8.09, respectively (Figure 9 and Table 1). Nor-BNI displayed similar potencies in antagonizing the PL017 and deltorphin I effects in both layers (Figure 9 and Table 1). On the other hand, in striatal membranes nor-BNI potently antagonized the (−)-U-50,488-induced inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity with a pKi of 9.49±0.05 (n=3) (result not shown).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Effects of increasing concentrations of nor-BNI on NalBzoH (1 μM)-, deltorphin I (1 μM)- and PL017 (50 μM)-induced inhibition of FSK-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in EPL membranes and on NalBzoH (1 μM)-, deltorphin I (1 μM)- and PL017 (50 μM)-induced stimulation of basal enzyme activity in GRL membranes. Control samples were incubated with vehicle. Values are the mean±s.e.m. of three experiments.

Discussion

In the present study, we show that in homogenates of the rat main olfactory bulb, NalBzoH is capable of exerting agonist effects on receptor signalling, as demonstrated by the stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding and the dual regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity. We also show that these responses occur in a layer-specific manner. Thus, NalBzoH stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding with a greater potency and efficacy in EPL and GRL than in ON-GL membranes. Moreover, NalBzoH had no effect on adenylyl cyclase activity in ON-GL, but significantly affected cyclic AMP formation in EPL and GRL membranes. The layer distribution of the NalBzoH effects was compared with that displayed by the ORL1 receptor agonist N/OFQ, the δ-opioid receptor agonist deltorphin I, the μ-opioid receptor agonist PL017 and the κ1-opioid receptor agonists (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593. The pattern of activity of NalBzoH was different from that of N/OFQ, which was effective in modulating cyclic AMP formation in each olfactory bulb layer, but appeared similar to that of deltorphin I and PL017, which were inactive in ON-GL and effective in the other layers. On the other hand, the κ1-opioid receptor agonists (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 failed to significantly affect either [35S]GTPγS binding or adenylyl cyclase activity in each layer of the olfactory bulb. The failure to detect κ1-opioid receptor-mediated effects was not attributable to the assay conditions, as in membranes of rat striatum, an area enriched of κ1-opioid receptors (Mansour et al., 1995), (−)-U-50,488, caused a significant cyclase inhibition with a potency (pEC50=7.79) that well correlated with that found in similar functional assays of the cloned κ1-opioid receptor (pEC50=8.11; Prather et al., 1995). In general, the layer localization of the responses elicited by the different opioid receptor agonists correlates with the reported localization of the respective receptors (Mansour et al., 1995). Moreover, the lack of effects of (−)-U-50,488 and U-69,593 agrees with the poor expression of κ1-opioid receptors in all layers of the rat olfactory bulb (Mansour et al., 1995).

Radioligand binding studies using bovine brain membranes indicated that [3H]NalBzoH bound to μ-opioid receptors in a pseudoirreversible manner (Price et al., 1989). It was therefore important to investigate whether the NalBzoH stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding was reversible. Time-course experiments indicated that the addition of naloxone to membranes preincubated with NalBzoH caused a rapid and complete reversal of the NalBzoH stimulation, indicating that the compound freely dissociated from the receptors. It is noteworthy that guanine nucleotides, which were present in the receptor functional assays, have been reported to promote the dissociation of the pseudoirreversible [3H]NalBzoH binding (Price et al., 1989).

As observed for agonists acting on μ- and δ-opioid and ORL1 receptors, NalBzoH stimulated basal adenylyl cyclase activity in the rat main olfactory bulb. The NalBzoH stimulatory effect was restricted to the GRL and was elicited with a potency (pEC50=8.14) close to that displayed in stimulating [35S]GTPγS binding (pEC50=7.86). These values are consistent with the reported receptor binding affinity of [3H]NalBzoH (pKi⩾9.0) in brain membranes (Clark et al., 1989; Cheng et al., 1992; Berzetei-Gurske et al., 1995). Both the stimulatory effects of NalBzoH on [35S]GTPγS binding and adenylyl cyclase activity were prevented by in vivo injection of olfactory bulbs with PTX, indicating the involvement of G proteins of the Gi/Go family in these responses. Moreover, the cyclase stimulation was significantly inhibited by membrane preincubation with αTGDP, a scavenger of G protein βγ subunits. These findings indicate that the NalBzoH stimulation occurred independently of activation of the G protein Gs, which has been proposed to mediate cyclic AMP stimulation by opioids in other cell systems (Cruciani et al., 1993; Wang & Gintzler, 1997), but was likely mediated by Gi/Go βγ subunits activating type II/IV adenylyl cyclases expressed in GRL membranes (Onali et al., 2001). This possibility is further supported by the finding that in GRL NalBzoH potentiated the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity by Gs-coupled CRH and PACAP 38 receptors. Indeed, the βγ-induced stimulation of type II/IV adenylyl cyclases is known to be markedly enhanced when the enzymes are concurrently activated by the α subunit of Gs (Sunahara et al., 1996). Previous studies have demonstrated that Gi/Go βγ subunits may also mediate the stimulatory effects on cyclic AMP formation elicited by activation of δ- and μ-opioid and ORL1 receptors in rat olfactory bulb (Olianas & Onali, 1999; Onali et al., 2001).

Besides enhancing basal and neurotransmitter-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, NalBzoH induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the enzyme activity stimulated by FSK. The inhibitory effect was evident in EPL and GRL membranes and was absent in ON-GL. The inhibitory effects correlated with the stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding in the same layers and can be explained by postulating that in specific anatomical sites G protein activation elicited by NalBzoH decreases the activity of some cyclase isoforms, such as types I and V/VI, which are inhibited by G protein α and βγ subunits (Sunahara et al., 1996) and are expressed in EPL and GRL (Onali et al., 2001). The lack of detecting the inhibitory effect in the absence of FSK is possibly due to the low basal activity of these cyclase isoforms and/or to the concomitant stimulatory effects on other cyclase isoforms.

The specific expression of the dual regulation of cyclic AMP formation by NalBzoH and selective δ- and μ-opioid receptor agonists in EPL and GRL, which are the sites of intrinsic and centrifugal regulation of olfactory processing (Mori et al., 1999), suggests that this mechanism may be relevant for the opioid modulation of some forms of olfactory learning (Kinsley et al., 1995; Roth & Sullivan, 2003). By sensitizing type II/IV adenylyl cyclases, opioids may enhance the responses of mitral cells and interneurons to CRH and PACAP peptides acting through Gs-coupled receptors, whereas, by inhibiting type I/VIII adenylyl cyclases they may curtail the cyclic AMP elevation elicited by Ca2+-mobilizing neurotransmitters, thus selectively affecting the efficiency of synaptic transmission. Whether chronic administration of NalBzoH or other opioid agonists can alter the dual modulation of cyclic AMP in the olfactory bulb is a matter of future investigation.

As the agonist-like effects of NalBzoH were qualitatively similar to those elicited by activation of ORL1 and opioid receptors, it was important to investigate whether these receptors mediated the NalBzoH effects. Therefore, competition experiments using a full range of antagonist concentrations were performed to assess whether the effects of NalBzoH persisted when the activity of other opioid receptor agonists was completely suppressed. We found that the selective ORL1 antagonists CompB and Nphe, which potently blocked the cyclase regulation by N/OFQ, had no effect on the agonist actions of NalbzoH, thus ruling out the participation of this receptor subtype. On the other hand, 70% of the cyclase inhibition and about 50% of the stimulation elicited by NalBzoH were blocked by the selective δ-opioid receptor antagonist TIPP with potencies similar to those shown in antagonizing deltorphin I. As expected by its high receptor subtype selectivity, TIPP had no effect on the responses elicited by PL017. These data indicate that in the olfactory bulb a large fraction of the NalBzoH agonist activity was mediated by stimulation of δ-opioid receptors. Following the same experimental paradigm, we examined the effects of the selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP. Increasing concentrations of this compound reversed the inhibitory and stimulatory effects of NalBzoH by 30 and 50%, respectively, with the same potencies displayed in blocking PL017. The selectivity of the CTAP antagonism was confirmed by the lack of effects on deltorphin I even at concentrations as high as 10 μM. These data indicate that a portion of the NalBzoH responses, corresponding to the fraction not blocked by TIPP, was mediated by activation of μ-opioid receptors. To complete the picture, we investigate the effects of the κ1-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI. Although this compound was capable of completely blocking the dual action of NalBzoH, the antagonism occurred with potencies similar to those displayed in blocking deltorphin I and PL017 and several-fold lower than that shown in counteracting (−)-U-50,488 in striatum. These data indicate that nor-BNI antagonized the action of NalBzoH by blocking δ- and μ-opioid receptors.

The combined agonist action of NalBzoH on different opioid receptors in the olfactory bulb was likely responsible for the atypical sensitivity to opioid antagonists with lower subtype selectivity, which in a preliminary study was interpreted as due to the involvement of the putative κ3-opioid receptor (Olianas & Onali, 2002). It will be of interest to investigate whether also in other cell systems the use of highly subtype-selective antagonists can disclose agonist effects of NalBzoH on δ- and μ-opioid receptor activity.

The maximal stimulatory and inhibitory effects of NalBzoH were significantly smaller than those elicited by deltorphin I, a highly efficacious δ-opioid receptor agonist and comparable to those elicited by the full μ-opioid receptor agonist PL017. As the antagonist data indicated that each NalBzoH effect resulted from the sum of δ- and μ-opioid receptor activations, it is possible that the compound acted as a partial agonist at both receptors. Further studies on cell systems expressing a single opioid receptor subtype are required for the definite assessment of the NalBzoH intrinsic activity.

The finding that NalBzoH activates μ-opioid receptors is in contrast with a previous study reporting that the compound behaved as a pure antagonist with no effect, per se, on cyclic AMP accumulation in cells transfected with the cloned μ-opioid receptor (Brown & Pasternak, 1998). The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, as cell lines overexpressing the receptors are generally an optimal system to detect agonist effects even by compounds with low intrinsic activity. It is possible that differences in the assay conditions (i.e. intact cells vs cell membranes) and/or sensitivity may be responsible for the divergent results.

In conclusion, the present study shows for the first time that in the brain NalBzoH is capable of triggering signalling mechanisms by acting on δ- and μ-opioid receptors. These properties do not support the assumption that NalBzoH is a selective agonist of the pharmacologically defined κ3-opioid receptor and should be taken into consideration when the compound is employed in cell systems expressing multiple opioid receptor subtypes.

Abbreviations

αTGDP

GDP-bound form of the α subunit of transducin

BSA

bovine serum albumin

CRH

corticotropin-releasing hormone

DTT

dithiothreitol

EPL

external plexiform layer of the main olfactory bulb

FSK

forskolin

GRL

granule cell layer of the main olfactory bulb

NalBzoH

naloxone benzoylhydrazone

N/OFQ

nociceptin/orphanin FQ

nor-BNI

nor-binaltorphimine

Nphe

[Nphe1]N/OFQ(1–13)NH2

ON-GL

olfactory nerve-glomerular layer of the main olfactory bulb

ORL1

opioid receptor-like

PACAP 38

pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 38

PL017

(N-Me-Phe3,D-Pro4)-casomorphin (1–4) amide

PTX

pertussis toxin

References

  1. ABDULLA F.A., SMITH P.A. Nociceptin inhibits T-type Ca2+ channel current in rat sensory neurons by a G-protein-independent mechanism. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:8721–8728. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-22-08721.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERZETEI-GURSKE I.P., WHITE A., POLGAR W., DeCOSTA B.R., PASTERNAK G.W., TOLL L. The in vitro pharmacological characterization of naloxone benzoylhydrazone. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1995;277:257–263. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00088-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BIGONI R., CAO G., RIZZI A., OKAWA H., REGOLI D., SMART D., LAMBERT D.G. Effects of naloxone benzoylhydrazone on native and recombinant nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptors. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2002;80:407–412. doi: 10.1139/y02-040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRADFORD M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BROWN G.P., PASTERNAK G.W. 3H-Naloxone benzoylhydrazone binding in MOR-1-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells: evidence for G-protein-dependent antagonist binding. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998;286:376–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CALO' G., GUERRINI R., BIGONI R., RIZZI A., MARZOLA G., OKAWA H., BIANCHI C., LAMBERT D.G., SALVADORI S., REGOLI D. Characterization of [Nphe1]nociceptin(1–13)NH2, a new selective nociceptin receptor antagonist. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000a;129:1183–1193. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CALO' G., GUERRINI R., RIZZI A., SALVADORI S., REGOLI D. Pharmacology of nociceptin and its receptor: a novel therapeutic target. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000b;129:1261–1283. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CHANG K.-J., WEI E.T., KILLIAN A., CHANG J.-K. Potent morphiceptin analogs: structure activity relationships and morphine-like activities. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1983;277:403–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CHENG J., ROQUES B.P., GACEL G.A., HUANG E., PASTERNAK G.W. κ3 opiate receptor binding in the mouse and rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 1992;226:15–20. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. CHENG J., STANDIFER K.M., TUBLIN P.R., SU W., PASTERNAK G.W. Demonstration of κ3-opioid receptors in the SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line. J. Neurochem. 1995;65:170–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65010170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. CHENG Y.C., PRUSOFF W.H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1973;22:3099–3102. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. CHIOU L.-C. Differential antagonism by naloxone benzoylhydrazone of the activation of inward rectifying by nociceptin and a μ-opioid in rat periaqueductal grey slices. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 2001;363:583–589. doi: 10.1007/s002100100402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. CLARK J.A., LIU L., PRICE M., HERSH B., EDELSON M., PASTERNAK G.W. Kappa opiate receptor multiplicity: evidence for two U50,488-sensitive κ1 subtypes and a novel κ3 subtype. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1989;251:461–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. CRUCIANI R.A., DVORKIN B., MORRIS S.A., CRAIN S.M., MAKMAN M.H. Direct coupling of opioid receptors to both stimulatory and inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins in F-11 neuroblastoma-sensory neuron hybrid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993;90:3019–3023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.3019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DHAWAN B.N., CESSELIN F., RAGHUBIR R., REISINE T., BRADLEY P.B., PORTOGHESE P.S., HAMON M. International Union of Pharmacology. XII. Classification of opioid receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 1996;48:567–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DUNNILL R.J., KAKIZAWA K., MCKNIGHT A.T., HENDERSON G. Characterization of the actions of naloxone benzoylhydrazone at μ-opioid, κ-opioid and ORL1 receptors in isolated tissues from rat and guinea pig. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1996;119:275P. [Google Scholar]
  17. ERSPAMER V., MELCHIORRI P., FALCONIERI-ERSPAMER G., NEGRI L., CORSI R., SEVERINI C., BARRA D., SIMMACO M., KREIL G. Deltorphins: a family of naturally occurring peptides with high affinity and selectivity for δ opioid binding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989;80:5871–5874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. FEDERMAN A.D., CONKLIN B.R., SCHRADER K.A., REED R.R., BOURNE H.R. Hormonal stimulation of adenylyl cyclase through Gi-protein βγ subunits. Nature. 1992;36:159–161. doi: 10.1038/356159a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. FLEMING W.W., WESTFALL D.P., DE LA LANDE S., JELLET L.B. Log-normal distribution of equieffective doses of norepinephrine and acetylcholine in several tissues. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1972;181:339–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KINSLEY C.H., MORSE A.C., ZOUMAS C., CORL S., BILLACK B. Intracerebroventricular infusions of morphine, and blockade with naloxone, modify the olfactory preferences for pups odors in lactating rats. Brain Res. Bull. 1995;37:103–107. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)00263-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MANSOUR A., FOX C.A., AKIL H., WATSON S.J. Opioid-receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: anatomical and functional implications. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:22–29. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93946-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MATHIS J.P., MANDYAM C.D., ALTEMEMI G.F., PASTERNAK G.W., STANDIFER K.M. Orphanin FQ/nociceptin and naloxone benzoylhydrazone activate distinct receptors in BE(2)-C human neuroblastoma cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2001;299:173–176. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01524-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. MEUNIER J.C., MOLLERAU C., TOLL L., SUAUDEAU C., MOISAND C., ALVINERIE P., BUTOUR J.L., GUILLEMOT J.C., FERRARA P., MONSERRAT B., MAZARGUIL H., VASSART G., PARMENTIER M., COSTENTIN J. Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature. 1995;377:532–535. doi: 10.1038/377532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. MOGIL J.S., PASTERNAK G.W. The molecular and behavioral pharmacology of the orphanin FQ/nociceptin peptide and receptor. Pharmacol. Rev. 2001;53:381–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. MORI K., NAGAO H., YOSHIHARA Y. The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. Science. 1999;286:711–715. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. NABESHIMA T., NODA Y., MAMIYA T. The role of nociceptin in cognition. Brain. Res. 1999;848:167–173. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01906-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. NODA Y., MAMIYA T., NABESHIMA T., NISHI M., HIGASHIOKA M., TAKESHIMA H. Loss of antinociception induced by naloxone benzoylhydrazone in nociceptin receptor-knockout mice. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:18047–18051. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.29.18047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. OLIANAS M.C., ONALI P. Characterization of opioid receptors mediating stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity in rat olfactory bulb. Mol. Pharmacol. 1992;42:109–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. OLIANAS M.C., ONALI P. Activation of opioid and muscarinic receptors stimulates basal adenylyl cyclase but inhibits Ca2+/calmodulin- and forskolin-stimulated enzyme activities in rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurochem. 1994;63:161–168. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.63010161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. OLIANAS M.C., ONALI P. Mediation by G protein βγ subunits of the opioid stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in rat olfactory bulb. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999;57:649–652. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00326-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. OLIANAS M.C., ONALI P. Evidence for the presence of κ3 opioid receptors positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase in rat olfactory bulb. Proc. Soc. Neurosci. 2002;643:7. [Google Scholar]
  32. ONALI P., INGIANNI A., OLIANAS M.C. Dual coupling of opioid receptor-like (ORL1) receptors to adenylyl cyclase in the different layers of the rat main olfactory bulb. J. Neurochem. 2001;77:1520–1530. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. OZAKI S., KAWAMOTO H., ITOH Y., MIYAJI M., IWASAWA Y, OHTA H. A potent and highly selective nonpeptidyl nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor (ORL1) antagonist: J-113397. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000;387:R17–R18. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00822-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. PAN Y.-X., CHENG J., XU J., ROSSI G., JACOBSON E., RYAN-MORO J., BROOKS A.I., DEAN G.E., STANDIFER K.M., PASTERNAK G.W. Cloning and functional characterization through antisense mapping of a κ3-related opioid receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 1995;47:1180–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. PAUL D., LEVISON J.A., HOWARD D.H., PICK C.G., HANN E.F., PASTERNAK G.W. Naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzoH) analgesia. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1990;255:769–774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. PELTON J.T., KAZMIERSKI W., GULYA K., YAMAMURA H.I., HRUBY V.J. Design and synthesis of conformationally constrained somatostatin analogues with high potency and specificity for μ opioid receptors. J. Med. Chem. 1986;29:2370–2375. doi: 10.1021/jm00161a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. PRATHER P.L., McGINN T.M., CLAUDE P.A., LIU-CHEN L.Y., LOH H.H., LAW P.Y. Properties of a κ-opioid receptor expressed in CHO cells: interaction with multiple G-proteins is not specific for any individual Gα subunit and is similar to that of other opioid receptors. Mol. Brain Res. 1995;29:336–346. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)00264-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. PRICE M., GISTRAK M.A., ITZHAK Y., HAHN E.F., PASTERNAK G.W. Receptor binding of [3H]naloxone benzoylhydrazone: a reversible κ and slowly dissociable μ opiate. Mol. Pharmacol. 1989;35:67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. REINSCHEID R.K., NOTHACKER H.P., BOURSON A., ARDATI A., HENNINGSEN R.A., BUNZOW J.R., GRANDY D.K., LANGEN H., MOSMA F.J., CIVELLI O. Orphanin FQ: a neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1995;270:792–794. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. REMMERS A.E., CLARK M.J., MANSOUR A., AKIL H., WOODS J.H., MEDZIHRADSKY F. Opioid efficacy in a C6 glioma cell line stably expressing the human kappa opioid receptor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999;288:827–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. ROTH T.L., SULLIVAN R.M. Consolidation and expression of a shock-induced odor preference in rat pups is facilitated by opioids. Physiol. Behav. 2003;78:135–142. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00961-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. SALOMON Y., LONDOS D., RODBELL M. A highly sensitive adenylate cyclase assay. Anal. Biochem. 1974;58:541–548. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90222-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. SCHILLER P.W., NGUYEN T.M.-D., WELTROWSKA G., WILKERS B.C., MARSDEN B.J., LEMIEUX C., CHUNG N.N. Differential stereochemical requirements of μ vs δ opioid receptors for ligand binding and signal transduction: development of a class of potent and highly δ-selective peptide antagonists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:11871–11875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. STANDIFER K.M., CHENG J., BROOKS A.I., HONRADO C.P., SU W., VISCONTI L.M., BIEDLER J.L., PASTERNAK G.W. Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of mu, delta and kappa3 opioid receptors expressed in BE(2)-C neuroblastoma cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1994;270:1246–1255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. SUNAHARA R.K., DESSAUER C.W., GILMAN A.G. Complexity and diversity of mammalian adenylyl cyclases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1996;36:461–480. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.002333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. TAKEMORI A.E., HO B.Y., NAESETH J.S., PORTOGHESE P.S. Nor-binaltorphimine, a highly selective kappa-opioid antagonist in analgesic and receptor binding assays. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1988;246:255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. WANG L., GINTZLER A.R. Altered μ-opiate receptor-G protein signal transduction following chronic morphine exposure. J. Neurochem. 1997;68:248–254. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68010248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES