Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1995 Aug;108(4):1715–1724. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.4.1715

Differential Solute Regulation in Leaf Blades of Various Ages in Salt-Sensitive Wheat and a Salt-Tolerant Wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love Amphiploid.

T D Colmer 1, E Epstein 1, J Dvorak 1
PMCID: PMC157553  PMID: 12228575

Abstract

Leaf blades of different ages from a salt-tolerant wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A. Love (syn. Agropyron elongatum Host) amphiploid and its salt-sensitive wheat parent (Triticum aestivum L.cv Chinese Spring) were compared for their ionic relations, organic solute accumulation, and sap osmotic potential ([pi]sap). The plants were grown for 18 d in nonsaline (1.25 mM Na+) and salinized (200 mM NaCl) nutrient solutions. The response of leaf blades to NaCl salinity depended greatly on their age or position on the main stem. Na and proline levels were highest in the oldest leaf blade and progressively lower in younger ones. Glycine betaine and asparagine levels were highest in the youngest blade. The [pi]sap was similar for corresponding leaf blades of both genotypes, but contributions of various solutes to the difference in [pi]sap between blades from control and 200 mM NaCl treatments differed greatly. The NaCl-induced decline in [pi]sap of the youngest leaf blade of Chinese Spring was predominately due to the accumulation of Na and to a lesser extent asparagine; in the amphiploid, it was due to a combination of glycine betaine, K, Na, and asparagine. Proline contributed little in the youngest blade of either genotype. In the older blades Na was the major solute contributing to the decline in [pi]sap. Thus, the maintenance of low Na and high K levels and the accumulation of glycine betaine in the young leaf tissues contributed to the NaCl tolerance of the amphiploid. No such role was evident for proline.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (984.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brunk D. G., Rich P. J., Rhodes D. Genotypic Variation for Glycinebetaine among Public Inbreds of Maize. Plant Physiol. 1989 Nov;91(3):1122–1125. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dietz K. J., Jäger R., Kaiser G., Martinoia E. Amino Acid Transport across the Tonoplast of Vacuoles Isolated from Barley Mesophyll Protoplasts : Uptake of Alanine, Leucine, and Glutamine. Plant Physiol. 1990 Jan;92(1):123–129. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Epstein E. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):11–17. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fan T. W., Colmer T. D., Lane A. N., Higashi R. M. Determination of metabolites by 1H NMR and GC: analysis for organic osmolytes in crude tissue extracts. Anal Biochem. 1993 Oct;214(1):260–271. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matoh T., Watanabe J., Takahashi E. Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, and Betaine Concentrations in Isolated Vacuoles from Salt-Grown Atriplex gmelini Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987 May;84(1):173–177. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.1.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES