Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1995 Oct;109(2):375–384. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.2.375

The Biochemical Response of Electrical Signaling in the Reproductive System of Hibiscus Plants.

J Fromm 1, M Hajirezaei 1, I Wilke 1
PMCID: PMC157600  PMID: 12228601

Abstract

Stimulation of the stigma of Hibiscus flowers by pollen, wounding (heat), or cold shock (4[deg]C) evokes electrical potential changes in the style, which propagate toward the ovary with a speed of 1.3 to 3.5 cm s-1. Potential changes were measured intracellularly by microelectrodes inserted in the style. The resting potential ranged from -90 to -112 mV (n = 20) in cells of the vascular tissue and from -184 to -220 mV (n = 22) in cells of the pollen-transmitting tissue. The amplitude of the potential changes was between 40 and 150 mV, depending on the kind of stimulus. Self- as well as cross-pollination hyperpolarized the resting potential after 50 to 100 s, followed by a series of 10 to 15 action potentials. In contrast, cooling of the stigma caused a single action potential with a different shape and duration, whereas wounding generated a strong depolarization of the membrane potential with an irregular form and a lower transmission rate. To determine the physiological function of the different signals measured in the style, the gas exchange and metabolite concentrations were measured in the ovary before and 10 min after stimulation of the stigma. Self- and cross-pollination caused a transient increase of the ovarian respiration rate by 12%, which was measured 3 to 5 min after the stigma was stimulated. Simultaneously, the levels of ATP, ADP, and starch increased significantly. In contrast, both cold shock and wounding of the stigma caused a spontaneous decrease of the CO2 content in the measuring chamber, as well as reduced metabolite concentrations in the ovary. Since the transport of labeled auxin from the top to the base of the style lasts at least 45 min, the influence of a chemical substance transmitted within 10 min is unlikely. Thus, our results strongly support the view that different, stimulus-dependent electrical signals cause specific responses of the ovarian metabolism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hernandez J., Pérez-Ojeda E., Serrano J. S., Castillo J. R., Serrano M. I. Possible involvement of epinephrine in the cardiovascular effect of naloxone in humans. Clin Ther. 1985;7(4):418–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kroh M., Miki-Hirosige H., Rosen W., Loewus F. Incorporation of label into pollen tube walls from myoinositol-labeled Lilium longiflorum pistils. Plant Physiol. 1970 Jan;45(1):92–94. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.1.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Walker-Simmons M., Jin D., West C. A., Hadwiger L., Ryan C. A. Comparison of proteinase inhibitor-inducing activities and phytoalexin elicitor activities of a pure fungal endopolygalacturonase, pectic fragments, and chitosans. Plant Physiol. 1984 Nov;76(3):833–836. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.3.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang N., Fisher D. B. Monitoring Phloem Unloading and Post-Phloem Transport by Microperfusion of Attached Wheat Grains. Plant Physiol. 1994 Jan;104(1):7–16. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Williamson R. E., Ashley C. C. Free Ca2+ and cytoplasmic streaming in the alga Chara. Nature. 1982 Apr 15;296(5858):647–650. doi: 10.1038/296647a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES