Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1996 Jan;110(1):15–21. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.1.15

Nuclear Matrix Attachment Regions and Transgene Expression in Plants.

S Spiker 1, W F Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC157689  PMID: 12226170

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (757.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adachi Y., Käs E., Laemmli U. K. Preferential, cooperative binding of DNA topoisomerase II to scaffold-associated regions. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):3997–4006. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen G. C., Hall G. E., Jr, Childs L. C., Weissinger A. K., Spiker S., Thompson W. F. Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell. 1993 Jun;5(6):603–613. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Oct 23;60(4):1410–1417. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bode J., Kohwi Y., Dickinson L., Joh T., Klehr D., Mielke C., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Biological significance of unwinding capability of nuclear matrix-associating DNAs. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):195–197. doi: 10.1126/science.1553545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonifer C., Hecht A., Saueressig H., Winter D. M., Sippel A. E. Dynamic chromatin: the regulatory domain organization of eukaryotic gene loci. J Cell Biochem. 1991 Oct;47(2):99–108. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240470203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breyne P., van Montagu M., Depicker N., Gheysen G. Characterization of a plant scaffold attachment region in a DNA fragment that normalizes transgene expression in tobacco. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):463–471. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall G., Jr, Allen G. C., Loer D. S., Thompson W. F., Spiker S. Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):9320–9324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.9320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jack R. S., Eggert H. The elusive nuclear matrix. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Oct 15;209(2):503–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Klehr D., Maass K., Bode J. Scaffold-attached regions from the human interferon beta domain can be used to enhance the stable expression of genes under the control of various promoters. Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 5;30(5):1264–1270. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matzke M. A., Matzke AJM. How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mlynarova L., Jansen R. C., Conner A. J., Stiekema W. J., Nap J. P. The MAR-Mediated Reduction in Position Effect Can Be Uncoupled from Copy Number-Dependent Expression in Transgenic Plants. Plant Cell. 1995 May;7(5):599–609. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.5.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mlynarova L., Loonen A., Heldens J., Jansen R. C., Keizer P., Stiekema W. J., Nap J. P. Reduced Position Effect in Mature Transgenic Plants Conferred by the Chicken Lysozyme Matrix-Associated Region. Plant Cell. 1994 Mar;6(3):417–426. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.3.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paranjape S. M., Kamakaka R. T., Kadonaga J. T. Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:265–297. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.001405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Phi-Van L., von Kries J. P., Ostertag W., Strätling W. H. The chicken lysozyme 5' matrix attachment region increases transcription from a heterologous promoter in heterologous cells and dampens position effects on the expression of transfected genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2302–2307. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Poljak L., Seum C., Mattioni T., Laemmli U. K. SARs stimulate but do not confer position independent gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Oct 25;22(21):4386–4394. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.21.4386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reeves R. Transcriptionally active chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 10;782(4):343–393. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(84)90044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Romig H., Fackelmayer F. O., Renz A., Ramsperger U., Richter A. Characterization of SAF-A, a novel nuclear DNA binding protein from HeLa cells with high affinity for nuclear matrix/scaffold attachment DNA elements. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3431–3440. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05422.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schlake T., Klehr-Wirth D., Yoshida M., Beppu T., Bode J. Gene expression within a chromatin domain: the role of core histone hyperacetylation. Biochemistry. 1994 Apr 12;33(14):4197–4206. doi: 10.1021/bi00180a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schöffl F., Schröder G., Kliem M., Rieping M. An SAR sequence containing 395 bp DNA fragment mediates enhanced, gene-dosage-correlated expression of a chimaeric heat shock gene in transgenic tobacco plants. Transgenic Res. 1993 Mar;2(2):93–100. doi: 10.1007/BF01969382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stalder J., Larsen A., Engel J. D., Dolan M., Groudine M., Weintraub H. Tissue-specific DNA cleavages in the globin chromatin domain introduced by DNAase I. Cell. 1980 Jun;20(2):451–460. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90631-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weintraub H., Groudine M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science. 1976 Sep 3;193(4256):848–856. doi: 10.1126/science.948749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14;270(15):8373–8376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. von Kries J. P., Buhrmester H., Strätling W. H. A matrix/scaffold attachment region binding protein: identification, purification, and mode of binding. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):123–135. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90214-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES