Abstract
Heating tomato fruit (Lycoperiscon esculentum) for 48 h at 38 degrees C prevented chilling injury from developing after 21 d at 2 degrees C, whereas unheated fruit developed high levels of injury. Although the overall protein pattern as seen by Coomassie blue staining was similar from heated and unheated fruit, some high- and many low-molecular-mass proteins were observed in the heated fruit that were absent or present in reduced amounts in unheated fruit. When fruit wer injected with [35S]methionine at harvest and then heated, they accumulated high levels of specific radiolabeled proteins that could still be detected after 21 d at 2 degrees C. If the fruit were held at 20 degrees C after heating, the label in the proteins declined rapidly and these fruit were also sensitive to chilling injury. Hsp70 antibody reacted more strongly with proteins from heated and chilled fruit than with proteins from chilled fruit. Hsp18.1 antibody reacted strongly with proteins from heated fruit but not with those from unheated fruit. A 23-kD protein, highly labeled in heated fruit but not in unheated fruit, had its amino terminus sequenced. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing a relationship between the persistence of heat-shock proteins and chilling tolerance in a plant tissue.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chen Q., Lauzon L. M., DeRocher A. E., Vierling E. Accumulation, stability, and localization of a major chloroplast heat-shock protein. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;110(6):1873–1883. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.6.1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis R. J., van der Vies S. M. Molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:321–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson I. B., Lurie S., Bowen J. H. Protein Synthesis and Breakdown during Heat Shock of Cultured Pear (Pyrus communis L.) Cells. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1429–1437. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heikkila J. J., Papp J. E., Schultz G. A., Bewley J. D. Induction of heat shock protein messenger RNA in maize mesocotyls by water stress, abscisic Acid, and wounding. Plant Physiol. 1984 Sep;76(1):270–274. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.1.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hightower L. E. Heat shock, stress proteins, chaperones, and proteotoxicity. Cell. 1991 Jul 26;66(2):191–197. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90611-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurkman W. J., Tanaka C. K. Solubilization of plant membrane proteins for analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 1986 Jul;81(3):802–806. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.3.802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kato S., Yamagishi K., Tatsuzawa F., Suzuki K., Takano S., Eguchi M., Hasegawa T. Identification of cytoplasmic and nuclear low-molecular-weight heat-shock proteins in tomato fruit. Plant Cell Physiol. 1993 Mar;34(2):367–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee G. J., Pokala N., Vierling E. Structure and in vitro molecular chaperone activity of cytosolic small heat shock proteins from pea. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 5;270(18):10432–10438. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.18.10432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin C. Y., Roberts J. K., Key J. L. Acquisition of Thermotolerance in Soybean Seedlings : Synthesis and Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins and their Cellular Localization. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):152–160. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]