Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1996 Jun;111(2):487–495. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.2.487

Volatile Semiochemicals Released from Undamaged Cotton Leaves (A Systemic Response of Living Plants to Caterpillar Damage).

USR Rose 1, A Manukian 1, R R Heath 1, J H Tumlinson 1
PMCID: PMC157859  PMID: 12226304

Abstract

Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.), attacked by herbivorous insects release volatile semiochemicals (chemical signals) that attract natural enemies of the herbivores to the damaged plants. We found chemical evidence that volatiles are released not only at the damaged site but from the entire cotton plant. The release of volatiles was detected from upper, undamaged leaves after 2 to 3 d of continuous larval damage on lower leaves of the same plant. Compounds released systemically were (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, (E)-[beta]-ocimene, linalool, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene, (E)-[beta]-farnesene, (E,E)-[alpha]-farnesene, and (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyl-1,3,7,11-tridecatetraene. All systemically released compounds are known to be induced by caterpillar damage and are not released in significant amounts by undamaged plants. Other compounds, specifically indole, isomeric hexenyl butyrates, and 2-methylbutyrates, known to be released by cotton in response to caterpillar damage, were not released systemically. However, when upper, undamaged leaves of a caterpillar-damaged plant were damaged with a razor blade, they released isomeric hexenyl butyrates, 2-methylbutyrates, and large amounts of constitutive compounds in addition to the previously detected induced compounds. Control plants, damaged with a razor blade in the same way, did not release isomeric hexenyl butyrates or 2-methylbutyrates and released significantly smaller amounts of constitutive compounds. Indole was not released systemically, even after artificial damage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (970.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldwin I. T., Schultz J. C. Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science. 1983 Jul 15;221(4607):277–279. doi: 10.1126/science.221.4607.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowers W. S., Nault L. R., Webb R. E., Dutky S. R. Aphid alarm pheromone: isolation, identification, synthesis. Science. 1972 Sep 22;177(4054):1121–1122. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4054.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Turlings T. C., Loughrin J. H., McCall P. J., Röse U. S., Lewis W. J., Tumlinson J. H. How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4169–4174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Turlings T. C., Tumlinson J. H., Lewis W. J. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science. 1990 Nov 30;250(4985):1251–1253. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4985.1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES