Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1996 Sep;112(1):319–326. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.1.319

Photosynthetic Gas Exchange and Discrimination against 13CO2 and C18O16O in Tobacco Plants Modified by an Antisense Construct to Have Low Chloroplastic Carbonic Anhydrase.

T G Williams 1, L B Flanagan 1, J R Coleman 1
PMCID: PMC157952  PMID: 12226395

Abstract

The physiological role of chloroplastic carbonic anhydrase (CA) was examined by antisense suppression of chloroplastic CA (on average 8% of wild type) in Nicotiana tabacum. Photosynthetic gas-exchange characteristics of low-CA and wild-type plants were measured concurrently with short-term, on-line stable isotope discrimination at varying vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and light intensity. Low-CA and wild-type plants were indistinguishable in the responses of assimilation, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO2 concentration to changing VPD or light intensity. At saturating light intensity, low-CA plants had lower discrimination against 13CO2 than wild-type plants by 1.2 to 1.8[per mille (thousand) sign]. Consequently, tissue of the low-CA plants was higher in 13C than the control plants. It was calculated that low-CA plants had chloroplast CO2 concentrations 13 to 22 [mu]mol mol-1 lower than wild-type plants. Discrimination against C18O16O in low-CA plants was 20% of that of the wild type, confirming a role of chloroplastic CA in the mechanism of discrimination against C18O16O ([delta]C18O16O). As VPD increased, stomatal closure caused a reduction in chloroplastic C02 concentration, and since VPD and chloroplastic CO2 concentration act in opposing directions on [delta]C18O16O, no effect of VPD was seen on [delta]C18O16O.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (869.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Flanagan L. B., Comstock J. P., Ehleringer J. R. Comparison of Modeled and Observed Environmental Influences on the Stable Oxygen and Hydrogen Isotope Composition of Leaf Water in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jun;96(2):588–596. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.2.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hatch M. D., Burnell J. N. Carbonic anhydrase activity in leaves and its role in the first step of c(4) photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1990 Jun;93(2):825–828. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.2.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacobson B. S., Fong F., Heath R. L. Carbonic anhydrase of spinach: studies on its location, inhibition, and physiological function. Plant Physiol. 1975 Mar;55(3):468–474. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.3.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Majeau N., Arnoldo M. A., Coleman J. R. Modification of carbonic anhydrase activity by antisense and over-expression constructs in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol. 1994 Jun;25(3):377–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00043867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Majeau N., Coleman J. R. Correlation of Carbonic Anhydrase and Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase Expression in Pea. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1393–1399. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams T. G., Colman B. Quantification of the Contribution of CO2, HCO3-, and External Carbonic Anhydrase to Photosynthesis at Low Dissolved Inorganic Carbon in Chlorella saccharophila. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jan;107(1):245–251. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES