Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1990 May-Jun;105(3):264–267.

Situational and financial barriers to prenatal care in a sample of low-income, inner-city women.

P A St Clair 1, V L Smeriglio 1, C S Alexander 1, F A Connell 1, J R Niebyl 1
PMCID: PMC1580003  PMID: 2113685

Abstract

The relationship between the use of prenatal care and factors that may impede access to care was examined in a sample of low-income, inner-city women. Situational and financial barriers to care were not important correlates of utilization. In unadjusted analyses, only insurance status and employment status were associated with utilization. Of the sociodemographic characteristics studied, only parity was strongly associated with the use of prenatal care. When the apparent associations between utilization and insurance status and utilization and employment were analyzed controlling for parity, the estimated strength and statistical significance of these relationships diminished considerably. Multiparous women who were more likely than primiparous women to be underutilizers were also more likely to be on medical assistance and to be unemployed. These findings suggest that situational and financial barriers are not important correlates of utilization for low-income, adult women living in urban areas where there are accessible clinic facilities and public transportation. Efforts to identify and surmount other kinds of barriers may prove to be a more effective approach to prenatal outreach for women in these circumstances.

Full text

PDF
264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bruce S. L., Petrie R. H., Chao S., Williams A. M., Imaizumi S. O. Unregistered obstetric patients: factor in perinatal losses in regionalized perinatal network. N Y State J Med. 1979 Aug;79(9):1374–1377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooney J. P. What determines the start of prenatal care? Prenatal care, insurance, and education. Med Care. 1985 Aug;23(8):986–997. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198508000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fingerhut L. A., Makuc D., Kleinman J. C. Delayed prenatal care and place of first visit: differences by health insurance and education. Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Sep-Oct;19(5):212-4, 234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ingram D. D., Makuc D., Kleinman J. C. National and state trends in use of prenatal care, 1970-83. Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):415–423. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joyce K., Diffenbacher G., Greene J., Sorokin Y. Internal and external barriers to obtaining prenatal care. Soc Work Health Care. 1983 Winter;9(2):89–96. doi: 10.1300/j010v09n02_09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein L. Nonregistered obstetric patients. A report of nine hundred seventy-eight patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Jul 15;110(6):795–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oxford L., Schinfeld S. G., Elkins T. E., Ryan G. M. Deterrents to early prenatal care: a comparison of women who initiated prenatal care during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J Tenn Med Assoc. 1985 Nov;78(11):691–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Poland M. L., Ager J. W., Olson J. M. Barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;157(2):297–303. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80156-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. St Clair P. A., Smeriglio V. L., Alexander C. S., Celentano D. D. Social network structure and prenatal care utilization. Med Care. 1989 Aug;27(8):823–832. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198908000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES