Abstract
When resources are limited, decisions must be made regarding which public health activities to undertake. A priority rating system, which incorporates various data sources, can be used to quantify disease problems or risk factors, or both. The model described in this paper ranks public health issues according to size, urgency, severity of the problem, economic loss, impact on others, effectiveness, propriety, economics, acceptability, legality of solutions, and availability of resources. As examples of how one State can use the model, rankings have been applied to the following health issues: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, coronary heart disease, injuries from motor vehicle accidents, and cigarette smoking as a risk factor. In this exercise, smoking is the issue with the highest overall priority rating. The model is sensitive to the precision of the data used to develop the rankings and works best for health issues that are not undergoing rapid change. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses can be incorporated into the model or used independently in the priority-setting process. Ideally, the model is used in a group setting with six to eight decision makers who represent the primary agency as well as external organizations. Using this method, health agencies, program directors, or community groups can identify the most critical issues or problems requiring intervention programs.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Connell D. B., Turner R. R., Mason E. F. Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs. J Sch Health. 1985 Oct;55(8):316–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1985.tb05656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacKenzie E. J., Shapiro S., Siegel J. H. The economic impact of traumatic injuries. One-year treatment-related expenditures. JAMA. 1988 Dec 9;260(22):3290–3296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pelletier K. R. Cost-effective data: searching for the unicorn continues. Am J Health Promot. 1988 Summer;3(1):57–59. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-3.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]