Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1990 Sep-Oct;105(5):524–529.

Comparison of three inducement techniques to improve compliance in a health survey conducted by telephone.

J Hornik 1, T Zaig 1, D Shadmon 1, G I Barbash 1
PMCID: PMC1580101  PMID: 2120732

Abstract

The use of telephone interviews for epidemiologic and public health studies has increased in recent years. Since telephone surveys are susceptible to lower response rates than personal interviews, several attempts have been reported to increase respondents' compliance using various precontact procedures. This investigation evaluates the comparative effectiveness of three techniques to enhance compliance with a relatively long telephone interview on epidemiologic topics. The theoretical and practical applications in the domain of telephone surveys of two techniques, the foot-in-the-door and the low ball, commonly considered nonpressure techniques, are discussed. A newly suggested, combined compliance procedure is also introduced and tested. Results show that compliance was greater for the new method when compared with each of the other two methods. Moreover, each of the three methods outperformed a control condition. The theoretical models developed to devise and explain the new techniques received empirical support in a public health survey employing 335 adult residents of Tel Aviv, Israel, in May 1988.

Full text

PDF
524

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baumgarten M., Siemiatycki J., Gibbs G. W. Validity of work histories obtained by interview for epidemiologic purposes. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Oct;118(4):583–591. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond G. G., Bodner K. M., Sobel W., Shellenberger R. J., Flores G. H. Validation of work histories obtained from interviews. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Aug;128(2):343–351. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Freedman J. L., Fraser S. C. Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Aug;4(2):195–202. doi: 10.1037/h0023552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harlow B. L., Hartge P. Telephone household screening and interviewing. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 May;117(5):632–633. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartge P., Cahill J. I., West D., Hauck M., Austin D., Silverman D., Hoover R. Design and methods in a multi-center case-control interview study. Am J Public Health. 1984 Jan;74(1):52–56. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES