Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1990 Sep-Oct;105(5):471–475.

Use of diagnostic imaging procedures and fetal monitoring devices in the care of pregnant women.

R M Moore Jr 1, L L Jeng 1, R G Kaczmarek 1, P J Placek 1
PMCID: PMC1580112  PMID: 2120723

Abstract

Medical devices and diagnostic imaging procedures such as ultrasound, X-rays, and electronic fetal monitoring devices are used in the medical care of many pregnant women today. The responsibility for the safety and effectiveness of these diagnostic technologies is shared by a number of Public Health Service agencies, one of which is the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), a unit within the Food and Drug Administration. The CDRH collaborated with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in conducting a study of recent trends in the uses of diagnostic ultrasound, medical X-rays, and electronic fetal monitoring devices in the medical care of pregnant women. This study used data from the 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys and the 1987 pretest to the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Hospitals and prenatal care providers of the pregnant women contributed information regarding the use of these medical devices. Between 1980 and 1987, ultrasound use more than doubled, increasing from 33.5 percent of pregnancies in 1980 to 78.8 percent in 1987 (P less than 0.001). More ultrasound examinations were performed earlier in gestation in 1987 than in 1980, with 10.1 percent being performed during the first trimester in 1987, compared with 6.9 percent in 1980 (P less than 0.001). Use of external electronic fetal monitoring devices during delivery also increased significantly between 1980 and 1987, from 33.5 percent to 74.6 percent (P less than 0.001). Use of medical X-rays among women with live births remained relatively unchanged, 15.0 percent in 1980 and 15.3 percent in 1987 (P = .282). The implications of these trends are discussed.

Full text

PDF
471

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bracken M. B. Ultrasonography in antenatal management: should it be a routine procedure? Fetal Ther. 1987;2(1):2–6. doi: 10.1159/000263272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewigman B. G. Should ultrasound be used routinely during pregnancy? An opposing view. J Fam Pract. 1989 Dec;29(6):660–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton P. M., Roney P. L., Keppel K. G., Placek P. J. Radiation procedures performed on U.S. women during pregnancy: findings from two 1980 surveys. Public Health Rep. 1984 Mar-Apr;99(2):146–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaczmarek R. G., Moore R. M., Jr, Keppel K. G., Placek P. J. X-ray examinations during pregnancy: National Natality Surveys, 1963 and 1980. Am J Public Health. 1989 Jan;79(1):75–77. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Placek P. J., Keppel K. G., Kessel S. S., Hutchins V. L. Uses of the 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys for the assessment of obstetric technologies. Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):529–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thacker S. B. Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 May;92(5):437–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES