Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1989 Jan-Feb;104(1):35–44.

An international survey of attitudes of medical geneticists toward mass screening and access to results.

D C Wertz 1, J C Fletcher 1
PMCID: PMC1580276  PMID: 2522232

Abstract

A survey on mass screening was sent to 1,053 medical geneticists in 18 nations, of whom 677 responded. Three theoretical screening situations were proposed, screening in the workplace for genetic susceptibility to work-related disease, carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, and presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease. Of the respondents, 72 percent thought screening in the workplace should be voluntary, and 81 percent said employers should have no access without the worker's consent, including 22 percent who believed that employers should have no access at all. There was strong consensus in all but one nation that insurance companies should have no access to test results without the worker's consent, and strong consensus in two countries that they should have no access at all. Most (82 percent) believed that screening for cystic fibrosis should be applied to the entire population, but 18 percent believed that it should be applied primarily to Caucasians. In all, 66 percent of respondents believed that individuals at risk for Huntington disease should be told their test results only if they say that they wish to know, recognizing a "right not to know" whether they will develop the disease in later life. Twelve percent thought that spouses should have access to test results if they asked, and 26 percent thought that spouses should be informed of results even if they did not ask. Geneticists in all nations were vividly aware of the potential damage from third party access to results, especially access by insurance companies. They had little sympathy with insurers' needs to assess actuarially accurate premiums.

Full text

PDF
35

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brock D. J., Bedgood D., Barron L., Hayward C. Prospective prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 1985 May 25;1(8439):1175–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92860-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fletcher J. C., Berg K., Tranøy K. E. Ethical aspects of medical genetics. A proposal for guidelines in genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and screening. Clin Genet. 1985 Feb;27(2):199–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holtzman N. A. Feature article: Recombinant DNA technology, genetic tests, and public policy. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Apr;42(4):624–632. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Knowlton R. G., Cohen-Haguenauer O., Van Cong N., Frézal J., Brown V. A., Barker D., Braman J. C., Schumm J. W., Tsui L. C., Buchwald M. A polymorphic DNA marker linked to cystic fibrosis is located on chromosome 7. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4Nature. 318(6044):380–382. doi: 10.1038/318380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Perry T. L. Some ethical problems in Huntington's chorea. Can Med Assoc J. 1981 Nov 15;125(10):1098–1100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Purdy E. Predictive testing. Lancet. 1986 May 31;1(8492):1278–1278. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91420-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wainwright B. J., Scambler P. J., Schmidtke J., Watson E. A., Law H. Y., Farrall M., Cooke H. J., Eiberg H., Williamson R. Localization of cystic fibrosis locus to human chromosome 7cen-q22. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4Nature. 318(6044):384–385. doi: 10.1038/318384a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. White R., Woodward S., Leppert M., O'Connell P., Hoff M., Herbst J., Lalouel J. M., Dean M., Vande Woude G. A closely linked genetic marker for cystic fibrosis. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4Nature. 318(6044):382–384. doi: 10.1038/318382a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES