Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1989 Sep-Oct;104(Suppl):31–33.

Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

D I Rosenthal 1, A N Tosteson 1
PMCID: PMC1580348  PMID: 2517698

Abstract

There is a positive relationship between bone mass and resistance to breaking. Measurements of the spine made by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) appear to allow a determination of the risk of vertebral compression fracture, although some important confirmatory studies remain to be done. Measurements made in the extremities generally do not allow prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Prediction of hip fracture risk is difficult because of the complex geometry of the femur. The few data which are available suggest that DPA may be useful to predict the risk of femoral neck fracture. If these data can be confirmed, cost-benefit analysis indicates that mass screening for osteoporosis may be a viable strategy. Physicians and patients using bone mass measurement techniques should be aware that these tests can be misleading, and that scrupulous attention to detail is required. Close supervision of the tests by a physician is necessary to ensure that meaningful data are obtained.

Full text

PDF
31

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cann C. E., Genant H. K., Kolb F. O., Ettinger B. Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Bone. 1985;6(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(85)90399-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cann C. E. Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners. Radiology. 1987 Jan;162(1 Pt 1):257–261. doi: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carter D. R., Hayes W. C. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science. 1976 Dec 10;194(4270):1174–1176. doi: 10.1126/science.996549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cummings S. R. Are patients with hip fractures more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence. Am J Med. 1985 Mar;78(3):487–494. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90343-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings S. R., Black D. Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis? Ann Intern Med. 1986 Jun;104(6):817–823. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-6-817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Firooznia H., Golimbu C., Rafii M., Schwartz M. S., Alterman E. R. Quantitative computed tomography assessment of spinal trabecular bone. II. In osteoporotic women with and without vertebral fractures. J Comput Tomogr. 1984 Apr;8(2):99–103. doi: 10.1016/0149-936x(84)90092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Firooznia H., Rafii M., Golimbu C., Schwartz M. S., Ort P. Trabecular mineral content of the spine in women with hip fracture: CT measurement. Radiology. 1986 Jun;159(3):737–740. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.3.3704152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Genant H. K., Cann C. E., Ettinger B., Gordan G. S. Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Nov;97(5):699–705. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-5-699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laval-Jeantet A. M., Roger B., Bouysee S., Bergot C., Mazess R. B. Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density. Radiology. 1986 May;159(2):463–466. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.2.3961178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Melton L. J., 3rd, Wahner H. W., Richelson L. S., O'Fallon W. M., Riggs B. L. Osteoporosis and the risk of hip fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Aug;124(2):254–261. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pacifici R., Susman N., Carr P. L., Birge S. J., Avioli L. V. Single and dual energy tomographic analysis of spinal trabecular bone: a comparative study in normal and osteoporotic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987 Feb;64(2):209–214. doi: 10.1210/jcem-64-2-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Riggs B. L., Melton L. J., 3rd Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1676–1686. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606263142605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Riggs B. L., Wahner H. W., Dunn W. L., Mazess R. B., Offord K. P., Melton L. J., 3rd Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest. 1981 Feb;67(2):328–335. doi: 10.1172/JCI110039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenthal D. I., Ganott M. A., Wyshak G., Slovik D. M., Doppelt S. H., Neer R. M. Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision. Invest Radiol. 1985 May-Jun;20(3):306–310. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198505000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sartoris D. J., André M., Resnik C. S., Resnick D., Resnick C. Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress. Radiology. 1986 Sep;160(3):707–712. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3755536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Slovik D. M., Rosenthal D. I., Doppelt S. H., Potts J. T., Jr, Daly M. A., Campbell J. A., Neer R. M. Restoration of spinal bone in osteoporotic men by treatment with human parathyroid hormone (1-34) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. J Bone Miner Res. 1986 Aug;1(4):377–381. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650010411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wasnich R. D., Ross P. D., Heilbrun L. K., Vogel J. M. Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Dec 1;153(7):745–751. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90338-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES