Abstract
Pyometra is the accumulation of purulent material in the uterine cavity. Its reported incidence is 0.01−0.5% in gynecologic patients; however, as far as elderly patients are concerned, its incidence is 13.6% [3]. The most common cause of pyometra is malignant diseases of genital tract and the consequences of their treatment (radiotherapy). Other causes are benign tumors like leiomyoma, endometrial polyps, senile cervicitis, cervical occlusion after surgery, puerperal infections, and congenital cervical anomalies. Spontaneous rupture of the uterus is an extremely rare complication of pyometra. To our knowledge, only 21 cases of spontaneous perforation of pyometra have been reported in English literature since 1980. This paper reports an additional case of spontaneous uterine rupture.
CASE REPORT
A 92-year-old woman with severe abdominal pain and vomiting for 24-hour duration was admitted to our hospital. Her gynecologic history was unremarkable having undergone an eventful menopause. She had no history of postmenopausal bleeding or increased vaginal discharge. On the physical examination, her abdomen was very tender, distended, and showed muscle rigidity. Rebound tenderness was absent. Bowel sounds were hypoactive. Her blood pressure was 110/65 mmHg, pulse rate was 114 beats/min, and axillary temperature was 36.9°C. Laboratory studies demonstrated a white cell count of 5100/mm3 with 92.3% neutrophilia and hemoglobin of 13 g/dL. A plain chest X-ray film showed free air under the diaphragm on both sides. The abdominal X-ray revealed no evidence of intestinal obstruction. Computed tomography scan of abdomen reported the presence of fluid within the abdominal cavity.
Emergency explorative laparotomy was performed under the diagnosis of perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. The investigation of the gastrointestinal tract and gallbladder failed to reveal a perforation. The uterus was found to have two perforations, approximately 1 cm in diameter each, both in the uterine fundus, and purulent material exuding from the uterine cavity was identified. The uterus was soft and slightly enlarged. Both parametriums were thickened and inflammatory changes were present. The fallopian tubes and the ovaries were normal. A total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed. Culture of the pus grew Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Histological examination revealed pyometra with no evidence of malignancy.
She was observed in the intensive care unit with strict management of respiration and circulation for postoperative three days. On the third postoperative day, she was transferred to the gynecology unit. Under the antibiotherapy with cefepime and metronidazole, her condition improved postoperatively. However, on the tenth postoperative day, wound dehiscence occurred and secondary wound closure was performed. No other complications have occurred, and as the patient completely recovered, she was discharged on the eighteenth postoperative day.
DISCUSSION
Pyometra, or pyometrium, is defined as the accumulation of pus in the uterine cavity resulting from interference with its natural drainage. It is an uncommon condition that occurs mainly in postmenopausal women and is rare in the premenopausal age group [18]. The classic triad of symptoms in patients with pyometra consists of purulent vaginal discharge, postmenopausal bleeding, and lower abdominal pain [2]. Various malignant and benign diseases have been shown to cause pyometra [1–18].
Table 1 summarizes the 22 cases of spontaneous uterine rupture since 1980, including our case. All cases were postmenopausal elderly females, mostly in the seventh or eighth decade, except for 34- and 41-year-old women. The age at diagnosis ranged from 34 to 92 years with a mean of 75.3 years. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (95.5%), vomiting (41.0%), nausea (9.1%), and fever (9.1%). The most prevalent preoperative diagnosis was generalized peritonitis (47.4%), pneumoperitoneum (47.4%), and perforation of gastrointestinal tract (36.8%). In only 3 cases (15.8%), perforation of pyometra was suspected. Laparotomy was performed in all cases except case 12 since her general condition was poor [3]. Hysterectomy was performed in 18 cases. The location of perforation was in the fundus in 18 patients (85.7%). The bacteriological studies of intraperitoneal pus were positive in 17 cases, in one case it was negative, and in 4 cases it was not mentioned in the article. Mixed infection with both anaerobes and aerobes was detected in most of the patients. Histologically, 7 cases (35%) were associated with malignant disease, and 2 cases (10%) were associated with leiomyoma. In 10 patients, no apparent cause could be identified.
Table 1.
Case | Reference no | Year | Age | Symptoms | Provisional diag | Causative disease | Perforation site | Bacterial culture | Treatment | Outcome |
| ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | [4] | 1981 | 86 | AP | GP, PNP | Rectum Ca | nm | Coli like rods, Clostridia | SVH + sigmoidostomy | Alive |
2 | [5] | 1982 | 86 | AP | GP | (—) | Fundus | nm | SVH | Died |
3 | [6] | 1985 | 77 | AP, N | GP | Endometrium Ca | Fundus | E coli, B fragilis | TAH + BSO | Died |
4 | [7] | 1985 | 78 | AP, N, V | nm | (—) | Fundus | nm | TAH + BSO | nm |
5 | [8] | 1985 | 67 | AP | PPU, PNP | (—) | Fundus | nm | TAH + BSO | Alive |
6 | [8] | 1985 | 77 | AP, V | AA | Sigmoid Ca | Fundus | nm | SVH + sigmoidectomy | Alive |
7 | [9] | 1986 | 41 | AP, V | PGIT, PNP | Leiomyoma | Right side | B fragilis | TAH | Alive |
8 | [10] | 1989 | 73 | AP, V, D | PGIT | (—) | Fundus | S intermedius | TAH | Alive |
Anaerobic streptococci | ||||||||||
9 | [11] | 1989 | 85 | AP | PGIT, PNP | Leiomyoma | Fundus | E coli, B fragilis | TAH + BSO | Died |
10 | [12] | 1991 | 82 | AP, V | PGIT | (—) | Fundus | E coli, B vulgaris | TAH + BSO | Died |
11 | [2] | 1993 | 67 | AP, GB | GP, PP, PNP | Cervix Ca | Fundus | (—) | SVH + BSO | Alive |
12 | [3] | 1995 | 86 | AP, F | PPU | (—) | Fundus | B fragilis, E coli | Aspiration and drainage | Died |
13 | [13] | 1996 | 80 | AP, VD | PGIT, PNP | Endometritis | Anterior wall | E coli | TAH | Alive |
14 | [14] | 1999 | 88 | V | GP, PGIT, PNP | (—) | Fundus | E coli | TAH + BSO | Alive |
15 | [1] | 2000 | 34 | AP | GP | Cervix Ca | Left cornual region | B fragilis, streptococci | Drainage and PL | Alive |
16 | [1] | 2000 | 72 | AP | nm | Cervix Ca | Fundus | B fragilis | Drainage and PL | Died |
17 | [1] | 2000 | 76 | AP | AD | (—) | Fundus | E coli | Drainage and PL | Alive |
18 | [15] | 2000 | 86 | AP, F | GP, PP, PNP | Adenomyozis | Fundus | C sphenoides | SVH | Alive |
19 | [16] | 2000 | 66 | AP | nm | (—) | Fundus | P mirabilis, klebsiella | TAH + BSO | Died |
20 | [17] | 2001 | 69 | AP, V | GP | nm | Fundus | Anaerobes | TAH | Died |
21 | [17] | 2001 | 89 | AP, V | GP, PP | nm | Fundus | E coli | TAH + BSO | Died |
22 | ∗ | 2004 | 92 | AP, V | PGIT, PNP | (—) | Fundus | B fragilis, E coli | TAH + BSO | Alive |
AP abdominal pain; N nausea; V vomiting; D diarrhea; F fever; VD vaginal discharge; GB genital bleeding; GP generalized peritonitis, PPU perforation of peptic ulcus; PGIT perforation of gastrointestinal tract; AC acute appendicitis; PP perforated pyometra; AD acute diverticulitis; Ca cancer; TAH total abdominal hysterectomy; BSO bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; SVH supra-vaginal hysterectomy; PL peritoneal lavage; PNP pneumoperitoneum; nm not mentioned; ∗ the current case.
Pyometra is a rare event in general population but more common in elderly women. It is caused by impairment of natural drainage of the cervix as a result of benign or malignant diseases. A detailed pelvic examination should be performed to rule out the associated malignancies. The diagnosis of pyometra is difficult, because it is usually asymptomatic.
CONCLUSION
Ruptured pyometra should be kept in mind in elderly women presenting with acute abdomen as an unusual but serious condition.
References
- 1.Chan LY, Yu VS, Ho LC, Lok YH, Hui SK. Spontaneous uterine perforation of pyometra. A report of three cases. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2000;45(10):857–860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Imachi M, Tanaka S, Ishikawa S, Matsuo K. Spontaneous perforation of pyometra presenting as generalized peritonitis in a patient with cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 1993;50(3):384–388. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sawabe M, Takubo K, Esaki Y, Hatano N, Noro T, Nokubi M. Spontaneous uterine perforation as a serious complication of pyometra in elderly females. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1995;35(1):87–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bostofte E, Legarth J. Spontaneous perforation of pyometra with diffuse peritonitis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1981;60(5):511–512. doi: 10.3109/00016348109155471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fagg SL, Sturdee DW. Spontaneous rupture of pyometra. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 1982;27(4):241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hosking SW. Spontaneous perforation of a pyometra presenting as generalized peritonitis. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 1985;61(717):645–646. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.61.717.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Parkinson DJ, Alderman B. Spontaneous rupture of the uterus associated with pyometra. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 1985;61(711):73–74. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.61.711.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hansen PT, Lindholt J. Spontaneously perforated pyometra. A differential diagnosis in acute abdomen. Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae. 1985;74(6):294–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jones VA, Elkins TE, Wood SA, Buxton BH. Spontaneous rupture of pyometra due to leiomyomata. A case report. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 1986;31(7):637–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bui A, Wilkinson S. Generalized peritonitis due to spontaneous rupture of pyometra. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1989;29(1):82–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1989.tb02887.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sussman AM, Boyd CR, Christy RS, Rudolph R. Pneumoperitoneum and an acute abdominal condition caused by spontaneous perforation of a pyometra in an elderly woman: a case report. Surgery. 1989;105(2 pt 1):230–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rasmussen KL, Knudsen TA, Luckow A. Perforation of a pyometra mimicking a perforated peptic ulcer. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1991;248(4):211–212. doi: 10.1007/BF02390360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ikematsu Y, Kitajima T, Kamohara Y, et al. Spontaneous perforated pyometra presenting as pneumoperitoneum. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 1996;42(4):274–276. doi: 10.1159/000291980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Inui A, Nitta A, Yamamoto A, et al. Generalized peritonitis with pneumoperitoneum caused by the spontaneous perforation of pyometra without malignancy: report of a case. Surgery Today. 1999;29(9):935–938. doi: 10.1007/BF02482791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nakao A, Mimura H, Fujisawa K, et al. Generalized peritonitis due to spontaneously perforated pyometra presenting as pneumoperitoneum: report of a case. Surgery Today. 2000;30(5):454–457. doi: 10.1007/s005950050624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tan LK, Busmanis I. Spontaneous uterine perforation from uterine infarction: a rare case of acute abdomen. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2000;40(2):210–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iwase F, Shimizu H, Koike H, Yasutomi T. Spontaneously perforated pyometra presenting as diffuse peritonitis in older females at nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49(1):95–96. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chan LY, Lau TK, Wong SF, Yuen PM. Pyometra. What is its clinical significance? The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2001;46(11):952–956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]