Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1997 Apr;113(4):1379–1384. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1379

Divergent fructokinase genes are differentially expressed in tomato.

Y Kanayama 1, N Dai 1, D Granot 1, M Petreikov 1, A Schaffer 1, A B Bennett 1
PMCID: PMC158261  PMID: 9112782

Abstract

Two cDNA clones (Frk1 and Frk2) encoding fructokinase (EC 2.7.1.4) were isolated from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). The Frk2 cDNA encoded a deduced protein of 328 amino acids that was more than 90% identical with a previously characterized potato (Solanum tuberosum) fructokinase. In contrast, the Frk1 cDNA encoded a deduced protein of 347 amino acids that shared only 55% amino acid identity with Frk2. Both deduced proteins possessed and ATP-binding motif and putative substrate recognition site sequences identified in bacterial fructokinases. The Frk1 cDNA was expressed in a mutant yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) line, which lacks the ability to phosphorylate glucose and fructose and is unable to grow on glucose or fructose. Mutant cells expressing Frk1 were complemented to grow on fructose but not glucose, indicating that Frk1 phosphorylates fructose but not glucose, and this activity was verified in extracts of transformed yeast. The mRNA corresponding to Frk2 accumulated to high levels in young, developing tomato fruit, whereas the Frk1 mRNA accumulated to higher levels late in fruit development. The results indicate that fructokinase in tomato is encoded by two divergent genes, which exhibit a differential pattern of expression during fruit development.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aulkemeyer P., Ebner R., Heilenmann G., Jahreis K., Schmid K., Wrieden S., Lengeler J. W. Molecular analysis of two fructokinases involved in sucrose metabolism of enteric bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Dec;5(12):2913–2922. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blatch G. L., Scholle R. R., Woods D. R. Nucleotide sequence and analysis of the Vibrio alginolyticus sucrose uptake-encoding region. Gene. 1990 Oct 30;95(1):17–23. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90408-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai N., Schaffer A. A., Petreikov M., Granot D. Arabidopsis thaliana hexokinase cDNA isolated by complementation of yeast cells. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):879–880. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dellapenna D., Alexander D. C., Bennett A. B. Molecular cloning of tomato fruit polygalacturonase: Analysis of polygalacturonase mRNA levels during ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6420–6424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doehlert D. C. Fructokinases from developing maize kernels differ in their specificity for nucleoside triphosphates. Plant Physiol. 1990 May;93(1):353–355. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.1.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doehlert D. C. Separation and characterization of four hexose kinases from developing maize kernels. Plant Physiol. 1989 Apr;89(4):1042–1048. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.4.1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fennington G. J., Jr, Hughes T. A. The fructokinase from Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii belongs to group I fructokinase enzymes and is encoded separately from other carbohydrate metabolism enzymes. Microbiology. 1996 Feb;142(Pt 2):321–330. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-2-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardner A., Davies H. V., Burch L. R. Purification and Properties of Fructokinase from Developing Tubers of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Physiol. 1992 Sep;100(1):178–183. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.1.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lütcke H. A., Chow K. C., Mickel F. S., Moss K. A., Kern H. F., Scheele G. A. Selection of AUG initiation codons differs in plants and animals. EMBO J. 1987 Jan;6(1):43–48. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04716.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Minet M., Dufour M. E., Lacroute F. Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae auxotrophic mutants by Arabidopsis thaliana cDNAs. Plant J. 1992 May;2(3):417–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.1992.00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray M. G., Thompson W. F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Oct 10;8(19):4321–4325. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson N. L., Hewitt J. D., Bennett A. B. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit : I. Developmental changes in carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jul;87(3):727–730. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sato T., Iwatsubo T., Takahashi M., Nakagawa H., Ogura N., Mori H. Intercellular localization of acid invertase in tomato fruit and molecular cloning of a cDNA for the enzyme. Plant Cell Physiol. 1993 Mar;34(2):263–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith S. B., Taylor M. A., Burch L. R., Davies H. V. Primary structure and characterization of a cDNA clone of fructokinase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv record). Plant Physiol. 1993 Jul;102(3):1043–1043. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.3.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walsh R. B., Clifton D., Horak J., Fraenkel D. G. Saccharomyces cerevisiae null mutants in glucose phosphorylation: metabolism and invertase expression. Genetics. 1991 Jul;128(3):521–527. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.3.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wan C. Y., Wilkins T. A. A modified hot borate method significantly enhances the yield of high-quality RNA from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Anal Biochem. 1994 Nov 15;223(1):7–12. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang F., Sanz A., Brenner M. L., Smith A. Sucrose Synthase, Starch Accumulation, and Tomato Fruit Sink Strength. Plant Physiol. 1993 Jan;101(1):321–327. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.1.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang F., Smith A. G., Brenner M. L. Temporal and Spatial Expression Pattern of Sucrose Synthase during Tomato Fruit Development. Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):535–540. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu L., Ueda T., Messing J. The formation of mRNA 3'-ends in plants. Plant J. 1995 Sep;8(3):323–329. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.08030323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yelle S., Hewitt J. D., Robinson N. L., Damon S., Bennett A. B. Sink Metabolism in Tomato Fruit : III. Analysis of Carbohydrate Assimilation in a Wild Species. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jul;87(3):737–740. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.3.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zrenner R., Salanoubat M., Willmitzer L., Sonnewald U. Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant J. 1995 Jan;7(1):97–107. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07010097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES