Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1997 Aug;114(4):1225–1236. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.4.1225

Pea Mutants with Reduced Sensitivity to Far-Red Light Define an Important Role for Phytochrome A in Day-Length Detection.

J L Weller 1, I C Murfet 1, J B Reid 1
PMCID: PMC158415  PMID: 12223768

Abstract

In garden pea (Pisum sativum L.), a long-day plant, long photoperiods promote flowering by reducing the synthesis or transport of a graft-transmissible inhibitor of flowering. Previous physiological studies have indicated that this promotive effect is predominantly achieved through a response that requires long exposures to light and for which far-red (FR) light is the most effective. These characteristics implicate the action of phytochrome A (phyA). To investigate this matter further, we screened ethylmethane sulfonate-mutagenized pea seedlings for FR-unresponsive, potentially phyA-deficient mutants. Two allelic, recessive mutants were isolated and were designated fun1 for FR unresponsive. The fun1-1 mutant is specifically deficient in the PHYA apoprotein and has a seedling phenotype indistinguishable from wild type when grown under white light. However, fun1-1 plants grown to maturity under long photoperiods show a highly pleiotropic phenotype, with short internodes, thickened stems, delayed flowering and senescence, longer peduncles, and higher seed yield. This phenotype results in large part from an inability of fun1-1 to detect day extensions. These results establish a crucial role for phyA in the control of flowering in pea, and show that phyA mediates responses to both red and FR light. Furthermore, grafting and epistasis studies with fun1 and dne, a mutant deficient in the floral inhibitor, show that the roles of phyA in seedling deetiolation and in day-length detection are genetically separable and that the phyA-mediated promotion of flowering results from a reduction in the synthesis or transport of the floral inhibitor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARBER H. N., PATON D. M. A gene controlled flowering inhibitor in Pisum. Nature. 1952 Apr 5;169(4301):592–592. doi: 10.1038/169592a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes S. A., Nishizawa N. K., Quaggio R. B., Whitelam G. C., Chua N. H. Far-red light blocks greening of Arabidopsis seedlings via a phytochrome A-mediated change in plastid development. Plant Cell. 1996 Apr;8(4):601–615. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.4.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botto J. F., Sanchez R. A., Whitelam G. C., Casal J. J. Phytochrome A Mediates the Promotion of Seed Germination by Very Low Fluences of Light and Canopy Shade Light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1996 Feb;110(2):439–444. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.2.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygbjerg I. C., Jepsen S., Theander T. G. Lymphocyte response to purified Plasmodium falciparum antigens during and after malaria. Acta Trop. 1986 Mar;43(1):55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday K. J., Koornneef M., Whitelam G. C. Phytochrome B and at Least One Other Phytochrome Mediate the Accelerated Flowering Response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to Low Red/Far-Red Ratio. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1311–1315. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hauser B. A., Cordonnier-Pratt M. M., Daniel-Vedele F., Pratt L. H. The phytochrome gene family in tomato includes a novel subfamily. Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Dec;29(6):1143–1155. doi: 10.1007/BF00020458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson E., Bradley M., Harberd N. P., Whitelam G. C. Photoresponses of Light-Grown phyA Mutants of Arabidopsis (Phytochrome A Is Required for the Perception of Daylength Extensions). Plant Physiol. 1994 May;105(1):141–149. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. López-Juez E., Nagatani A., Tomizawa K., Deak M., Kern R., Kendrick R. E., Furuya M. The cucumber long hypocotyl mutant lacks a light-stable PHYB-like phytochrome. Plant Cell. 1992 Mar;4(3):241–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nagatani A., Reed J. W., Chory J. Isolation and Initial Characterization of Arabidopsis Mutants That Are Deficient in Phytochrome A. Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):269–277. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Parks B. M., Quail P. H. Phytochrome-Deficient hy1 and hy2 Long Hypocotyl Mutants of Arabidopsis Are Defective in Phytochrome Chromophore Biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1991 Nov;3(11):1177–1186. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.11.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Parks B. M., Quail P. H. hy8, a new class of arabidopsis long hypocotyl mutants deficient in functional phytochrome A. Plant Cell. 1993 Jan;5(1):39–48. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Quail P. H., Boylan M. T., Parks B. M., Short T. W., Xu Y., Wagner D. Phytochromes: photosensory perception and signal transduction. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):675–680. doi: 10.1126/science.7732376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reed J. W., Nagatani A., Elich T. D., Fagan M., Chory J. Phytochrome A and Phytochrome B Have Overlapping but Distinct Functions in Arabidopsis Development. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1139–1149. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reed J. W., Nagpal P., Poole D. S., Furuya M., Chory J. Mutations in the gene for the red/far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell. 1993 Feb;5(2):147–157. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.2.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sharrock R. A., Quail P. H. Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: structure, evolution, and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family. Genes Dev. 1989 Nov;3(11):1745–1757. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.11.1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shinomura T., Nagatani A., Chory J., Furuya M. The Induction of Seed Germination in Arabidopsis thaliana Is Regulated Principally by Phytochrome B and Secondarily by Phytochrome A. Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):363–371. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Somers D. E., Sharrock R. A., Tepperman J. M., Quail P. H. The hy3 Long Hypocotyl Mutant of Arabidopsis Is Deficient in Phytochrome B. Plant Cell. 1991 Dec;3(12):1263–1274. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.12.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Terry M. J., Kendrick R. E. The aurea and yellow-green-2 mutants of tomato are deficient in phytochrome chromophore synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 30;271(35):21681–21686. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weller J. L., Nagatani A., Kendrick R. E., Murfet I. C., Reid J. B. New lv Mutants of Pea Are Deficient in Phytochrome B. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):525–532. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weller J. L., Terry M. J., Rameau C., Reid J. B., Kendrick R. E. The Phytochrome-Deficient pcd1 Mutant of Pea Is Unable to Convert Heme to Biliverdin IX[alpha]. Plant Cell. 1996 Jan;8(1):55–67. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Whitelam G. C., Johnson E., Peng J., Carol P., Anderson M. L., Cowl J. S., Harberd N. P. Phytochrome A null mutants of Arabidopsis display a wild-type phenotype in white light. Plant Cell. 1993 Jul;5(7):757–768. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.7.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Tuinen A., Kerckhoffs L. H., Nagatani A., Kendrick R. E., Koornneef M. Far-red light-insensitive, phytochrome A-deficient mutants of tomato. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Jan 20;246(2):133–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00294675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES