Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that tissue expression levels of transcript AA454543 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are significantly higher than those of normal livers, livers with cirrhosis, and livers with hepatitis. In addition, a higher level of transcript AA454543 in tumor tissues is associated with poor prognosis. We aim to examine whether quantitative measurement of preoperative plasma transcript AA454543 can provide similar prognostic information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 84 HCC patients before surgery. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, using TaqMan system, was employed to measure plasma transcript AA454543 and α-fetoprotein (AFP) RNA levels. We assessed their prediction power in prognosis using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: High plasma transcript AA454543 RNA levels were associated with poor overall survival (log-rank test, P < .01). Patients with different plasma AFP RNA levels revealed no difference in overall survival (log-rank test, P = .88). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level (hazard ratio = 4.8, P < .01) and tumor stage (hazard ratio = 1.7, P < .01) were determined to be independent risk factors for the prediction of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level can provide prognostic information for HCC patients receiving curative partial hepatectomy.
Keywords: Plasma RNA, circulating nucleic acid, liver cancer, prognosis, biomarker
Introduction
Studies on the detection of cell-free nucleic acids in plasma and serum have revealed potential in the initial diagnosis and follow-up monitoring of a variety of cancers [1–3]. Different RNA targets have been used in diverse cancer studies, and cytokeratin-19 frequently serves as a universal marker for solid tumors of epithelial cell origin [4]. In addition, studies on RNA targets of viral and cellular origins have been reported, including studies on Epstein-Barr virus RNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, tyrosinase RNA in melanoma, catenin RNA in adenoma and colorectal cancer, hnRNP B1 RNA in lung cancer, and telomerase RNA in breast cancer, melanoma, and thyroid cancer [5–10].
We have previously reported that the tissue expression of transcript AA454543 (GenBank accession no. BC043195) was specific for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a significantly higher level in tumor tissues than in liver tissues adjacent to tumors (comprising hepatitis and cirrhotic livers) and in normal livers [11,12]. Furthermore, a higher level of transcript AA454543 in tumor tissues was associated with aggressive tumor features, including venous infiltration, microsatellite nodules, late tumor stage, and poor overall survival [12]. Such association could be explained by the biologic role of AA454543 in cell invasion. An increased level of transcript AA454543 might enhance the invasive ability of tumor cells, subsequently resulting in venous infiltration and formation of microsatellite nodules. Importantly, transcript AA45453 levels in tumor tissues and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival [12]. The prognostic significance of transcript AA454543 was first identified in our earlier cDNA microarray dataset [11], in which data were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and then confirmed in a separate HCC sample set [12]. Thus, quantitative assay of the molecular marker transcript AA454543 in tumor tissues can provide general prognostic information (two independent cohorts of HCC patients, and prediction is independent of the assay method used).
In the current study, we aim to investigate whether preoperative plasma RNA levels of transcript AA454543 can provide prognostic information. Plasma RNA levels of transcript AA454543 and α-fetoprotein (AFP) were examined. Plasma RNA data were compared with serum AFP protein data and tumor stage to determine their prediction power on overall survival. We report here that preoperative plasma transcript AA454543 level is one of the independent prognostic factors for HCC following partial hepatectomy.
Patients and Methods
Patients
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of The University of Hong Kong, and informed consent was obtained from the patients. Between October 1999 and May 2004, 84 patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for HCC at the Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, were recruited for the current study. The same team of surgeons performed all operations throughout this period. All patients had been diagnosed with primary HCC and have not received other treatments before surgery. Clinicopathological data were prospectively collected (Table 1). Overall survival was measured from the date of surgery to the date of death due to liver cancer as endpoint by the end of follow-up. Disease-free survival was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence and/or liver cancer death as endpoint by the end of follow-up. Diagnosis of recurrence was based on typical imaging findings in a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan and an increased serum AFP level. In case of uncertainty, hepatic arteriography and post-Lipiodol computed tomography scan were performed; when necessary, fine-needle aspiration cytology was used for confirmation. Up to the date of analysis, the median follow-up time was 25.4 months.
Table 1.
Clinicopathological Features of HCC.
| HCC Features | Total (n = 84) |
| Age in years [median (range)] | 52 (24–79) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 72 |
| Female | 12 |
| Tumor stage* | |
| I and II | 46 |
| III and IV | 38 |
| Tumor size (cm) [median (range)] | 11 (3–22) |
| Serum AFP level (ng/ml) [median (range)] | 249.5 (1–1,043,700) |
| HBsAg | |
| Positive | 74 |
| Negative | 10 |
| Underlying liver disease | |
| Noncirrhosis | 59 |
| Cirrhosis | 25 |
| Disease recurrence | |
| With | 50 |
| Without | 34 |
| Disease mortality | |
| Death | 31 |
| Living | 53 |
Tumor stage according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual [15].
Isolation of Plasma RNA
Blood samples (10 ml each) were collected from each patient before the operation. The blood samples collected were stored at 4°C, and the plasma separated within 24 hours. The blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 minutes to separate the plasma. Parallel plasma samples that had been centrifuged once and twice were compared, and they did not reveal a significant difference in plasma RNA levels, including 18S, AFP, and AA454543 in our pilot study. Thereafter, including all plasma samples used in the current study, the blood samples were centrifuged once. Plasma specimens were stored at -70°C until use. Total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL LS reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Briefly, 200 µl of plasma was added to 600 µl of TRIZOL LS, mixed, incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes, and added to 160 µl of chloroform. After thorough mixing, the mixture was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. The aqueous phase (360 µl) on top was transferred to a clean tube, then added to 10 mg of glycogen and 400 µl of isopropanol. RNA was precipitated by centrifugation, and RNA pellet was washed once with 75% ethanol. The RNA pellet was then dissolved with 50 µl of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-water for subsequent quantitative assays.
Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed using an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), as described [12]. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with 4.5 µl of total RNA in 50 µl of reaction mixture using High-Capacity cDNA Achive kit (Applied Biosystems), following the manufacturer's instructions. The 5-µl first-strand cDNA was then used in each 25-µl quantitative assay with 1x PCR buffer II; 5.5 mM MgCl2; 0.2 mM dATP, dCTP, and dGTP; 0.4 mM dUTP; and 0.625 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers and probe for transcript AA454543 were AA454543-F (5′-CAATCA GAC AGG CTG CTT TTC TC-3′), AA454543-R (5′-CTT CCT AAT TAA TGT TTG CAC CAT ATG-3′), and AA454543-P (5′-6FAM AAC TCA TAG GTA ACA AAC ACA AA-MGBNFQ-3′). The primers and probe for AFP RNA were AFP-F (5µ-ACT CCA GTA AAC CCT GGT GTT G-3µ), AFP-R (5′-ACA TAT GTT TCA TCC ACC ACC AA-3′), and AFP-P (5′-6FAM CAC TTC TTC ATA TGC C-MGBNFQ-3′). The primers and probe reagents for control ribosomal 18S were ready-made reagents (Pre-Developed TaqMan Assay Reagents; Applied Biosystems) and served as quality control for all samples in all assays. Transcript quantification was performed at least in duplicate for every sample. The PCR profile for the quantitative assay included incubation at 95°C for 10 minutes and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. The amplification plots of PCR were used to determine the threshold cycle (CT), and the threshold line was usually set at Rn = 0.1. The CT value represented the PCR cycle at which an increase in reporter fluorescence above a baseline signal could first be detected. Calibrator control was the sample at which the transcript amount was at the baseline level of the sample series. The relative amount of plasma RNA, after normalization with the calibrator and after adjustment for plate-to-plate variation, presented the fold difference (log 2 base scale) relative to baseline level. The relative amount of plasma transcript AA454543 is expressed as dCT(AA454543), where dCT(AA454543 test sample) = [CT(AA454543 calibrator) - CT(AA454543 test sample)]. Similarly, the relative amount of plasma AFP mRNA is expressed as dCT(AFP), where dCT(AFP test sample) = [CT(AFP calibrator) - CT(AFP test sample)].
Study Report
We followed the recommendation for tumor marker prognostic studies by the National Cancer Institute-European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (NCI-EORTC) [13]. Plasma quantitative assays were performed by investigators blinded to the study endpoint. We have a designated staff member who was tasked to build up the prospective clinical database, including follow-up details, and who was not aware of assay data. Assays were performed by another research staff member who did not know the clinical details of the specimen. The assay data of the biomarker, together with the clinical information, were then combined and analyzed by an independent investigator.
Statistical Methods
The quantitative data of plasma transcript AA454543 RNA, AFP RNA, and serum AFP protein levels were continuous variables, and the data were modeled as categorical variables in Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. The Youden index (sensitivity + specificity -1) [14] was employed to determine the optimal cutoff point for prognosis prediction. Other cutoff values, including the mean and the median, have also been considered and examined. They were all able to segregate patients with similar clinical implications. The Youden index was employed to simultaneously maximize the sensitivity and the specificity of the prediction. The association of transcript AA454543 data, AFP data, and tumor stage [15] with overall survival and disease-free survival was examined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression with a forward stepwise selection procedure. All statistical analyses were performed by a statistical software (SPSS version 12.0 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Differences were considered significant when P < .05.
Results
Ribosomal 18S RNA was used as an endogenous quality control for all assays, and 18S RNA was detectable in all plasma specimens from HCC patients [84 of 84 (100%); median = 29.92, range = 24.65–33.02]. 18S RNA data indicated the RNA quality and integrity of plasma specimens. Plasma transcript AA454543 RNA was detectable in the majority of specimens from HCC patients (78 of 84; 93%), with a wide data range (median = 14.84, range = 0–22.02). The positive detection rates of transcript AA454543 in plasma (current study) and liver cancer tissues [12] were similar, reflecting the significance of circulating tumor nucleic acids. Plasma AFP RNA was detectable only in a subset of HCC patients (65 of 84; 77%), with a diverse data range (median = 12.43, range = 0–18.75). There was no correlation between plasma RNA levels of transcript AA454543 and AFP (Pearson correlation = -0.035, P = .752). The positive detection rate of plasma AFP RNA (current study) was comparable to that of serum AFP in the literature, as AFP was only expressed in a subset of HCC tissues. The current data further highlighted the importance of identifying novel tumor markers with sensitivity and specificity comparable to or better than those of AFP for liver cancer management.
To evaluate if a high plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level in HCC patients is associated with poor prognosis, we analyzed its level for overall survival. Kaplan-Meier plot was used to examine the prediction power by the quantity of plasma transcript AA454543. The patients were segregated into low-plasma or high-plasma transcript AA454543 groups using the Youden index to determine the optimal cutoff value. There were 64 patients in the low-plasma transcript AA454543 group (range = 0–16.37) and 20 patients in the high-plasma transcript AA454543 group (range = 16.38–22.02). By the plasma transcript AA454543 level alone, patients with a high plasma transcript AA454543 level were found to have poor overall survival (log-rank test, P < .01) (Figure 1). The analysis was repeated based on the plasma transcript AA454543 levels and tumor stages [15] of patients. In early-stage (stages I and II) patients, a high plasma transcript AA454543 level was associated with poor overall survival (log-rank test, P = .01). In late-stage (stages III and IV) patients, a high plasma transcript AA454543 level was also associated with poor overall survival (log-rank test, P < .01).
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier overall survival plot according to plasma transcript AA454543 RNA levels. (A) All patients (log-rank test, P < .01). (B) Early-stage (stages I and II) patients (log-rank test, P = .01). (C) Late-stage (stages III and IV) patients (log-rank test, P < .01).
AFP RNA levels were also examined to evaluate their prediction power. The patients were segregated into low-plasma or high-plasma AFP RNA groups using the Youden index to determine the optimal cutoff value. There were 27 patients in the low-plasma AFP RNA group (range = 0–5.56) and 57 patients in the high-plasma AFP RNA group (range = 5.57–18.75). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with different plasma AFP RNA levels did not reveal significant differences in overall survival (log-rank test, P = .88) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier overall survival plot according to plasma AFP RNA levels in all patients (log-rank test, P = .88).
AFP protein levels were also evaluated for association with overall survival. Patients were segregated according to AFP protein levels, and the optimal cutoff value was 99 ng/ml, as determined by the Youden index. There were 36 patients in the low-AFP protein group (range = 0–99 ng/ml) and 48 patients in the high-AFP protein group (range = 100–1,043,700 ng/ml). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with high AFP protein levels revealed poor overall survival (log-rank test, P = .03) (Figure 3). In early-stage patients, the difference in AFP protein levels revealed no difference in overall survival (log-rank test, P = .43). Nonetheless, high AFP protein levels showed a significant association with poor overall survival only in late-stage patients (log-rank test, P <.01).
Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier overall survival plot according to serum AFP protein levels. (A) All patients (log-rank test, P = .03). (B) Early-stage (stages I and II) patients (log-rank test, P = .43). (C) Late-stage (stages III and IV) patients (log-rank test, P < .01).
Cox regression analysis was employed to compare gene data with tumor stage on the prediction for overall survival (Table 2). By univariate Cox regression analysis, high plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.4–6.3; P < .01], high AFP protein level (HR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.1–5.3; P = .04), and late tumor stage (HR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.1–2.2; P = .02) were significantly associated with overall survival (Table 2). The plasma AFP RNA level did not demonstrate an association with overall survival (P = .88). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, high plasma transcript AA454543 level (HR = 4.8; 95% CI = 2.1–10.6; P < .01), AFP protein level (HR = 3.0; 95% CI = 1.3–6.8; P < .01), and late tumor stage (HR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.2–2.5; P < .01) were found to be independent prognostic factors for overall survival.
Table 2.
Cox Regression Analyses for Overall Survival on Plasma Transcript AA454543 RNA Level, Plasma AFP RNA Level, Serum AFP Protein Level, and Tumor Stage.
Other clinicopathological features that might influence prognosis were also examined together with plasma transcript AA454543 data by multivariate Cox regression analysis (Tables W1 and W2). A similar analysis in relation to disease-free survival was performed (Figures W1–W3). Irrespective of the inclusion of other clinicopathological variables in multivariate Cox regression analyses, the same conclusion can be drawn: plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level is an independent risk factor for the prediction of overall survival and disease-free survival.
To further investigate whether the quantitative measurement of plasma RNA levels could serve as a diagnostic tool for HCC, we compared the data obtained from HCC patients to those obtained from healthy individuals (n = 10) and cirrhotic patients with no underlying HCC (n = 10) (Figures W4 and W5). Concerning the plasma RNA levels of ribosomal 18S, transcript AA454543, and AFP, the outliers were all HCC patients. However, control and patient groups revealed an overlap in data range. Thus, plasma RNA levels of transcript AA454543 could provide prognostic information on HCC patients, but preliminary analysis showed that it would not be applicable for disease diagnosis with the current experimental design.
Discussion
We have previously reported that a high level of transcript AA454543 in tumor tissues is predictive of poor prognosis in HCC patients [12]. In the current study, we showed that plasma transcript AA454543 level could provide similar prognostic information in both early-stage and late-stage HCC patients. Conversely, plasma AFP RNA level revealed no prognostic significance, and serum AFP protein level only demonstrated prognostic information for late-stage patients, but not for early-stage patients. Similar AFP protein data have been reported. In patients with large HCCs (> 5 cm), a high AFP protein level was significantly associated with a lower 10-year overall survival, but AFP protein levels revealed no association with overall survival in patients with small HCC [16]. Thus, AFP protein level can generally be referred to as a reliable marker only in the advanced stage of HCC, but not in the early stage, and plasma AFP RNA level revealed no prognostic information in the current study. The performance of transcript AA454543 and AFP as plasma RNA target was compared. Plasma AFP RNA was detectable only in a subset of HCC patients (77%)—a positive rate comparable to that of AFP proteins in the literature. However, plasma transcript AA454543 was detectable in the majority of HCC patients (93%)—a positive rate comparable to that of transcript AA454543 expression in HCC tissues (96 of 101; 95%) [12]. Thus, transcript AA454543 would be an applicable marker for the majority of HCC patients, whereas AFP (as plasma RNA target or serum protein) would be an appropriate marker only for a subgroup of HCC patients. Existing data demonstrated that the performance of transcript AA454543 was better than that of AFP as plasma RNA target.
The quantitation of plasma transcript AA454543 for prognosis prediction will encompass important clinical information to stratify patients into different risk groups. Stratification is even better than tumor staging because, among patients in early tumor stage, further stratification into a subgroup of patients whose survival rates are similar to late-tumor-stage patients is possible. This helps to identify high-risk patients who have a high plasma transcript AA454543 level in the early tumor stage, as they may benefit from adjuvant therapy after partial hepatectomy. Conversely, low-risk patients developing recurrence but with poor liver function may have good prognosis if they undergo salvage liver transplantation [17], even though they have large tumors or have been diagnosed at a late stage.
To further understand the significance of plasma RNA levels, we have analyzed the clinicopathological features of patients with different plasma RNA levels of transcript AA454543 and AFP (data not shown). Other than the outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival, the plasma RNA levels of AA454543 and AFP were not significantly associated with tumor stage, tumor size, age, venous infiltration, microsatellite nodules, tumor encapsulation, liver cirrhosis, differentiation status (Edmondson-Steiner grade), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status, and intrahepatic or extrahepatic recurrence. The exact mechanism of how tumor RNA entered the circulation is unknown [1–3]; thus, its clinicopathological significance is not clear. Nonetheless, the higher transcript AA454543 levels in HCC tissues were associated with aggressive tumor features [12]. As plasma transcript AA454543 levels were a reflection of tumor levels, they could provide prognostic information.
Earlier reports on circulating tumor contents were mostly assays on circulating tumor cells, and controversial data on diagnostic and prognostic values were presented [18–31]. Recently, extracellular-based assays (circulating DNA/RNA) were found to be as efficacious as, or better than, cell-based assays (circulating tumor cells) in the detection of preneoplastic lesions and micrometastases [32]. Extracellular-based assays demonstrated potential for broad clinical applications because they allow automation and high-throughput platforms, and are less prone to sampling errors [2,32]. Furthermore, the relative proportion of tumor-derived nucleic acids was reported to be higher in plasma than in serum [33,34]. Thus, in the current study, we employed quantitative measurements on plasma RNA rather than on serum RNA. Exactly how RNA entered the circulation was unknown [1–3]. RNA in apoptotic bodies was protected from degradation in the circulation [35], and apoptosis was a mechanism through which nucleic acids entered the circulation [36]. Accordingly, it was speculated that circulating nucleic acids might be released from the apoptotic cells of the tumor mass. Alternatively, tumor cells were detached from the tumor mass (process of metastasis), and some of these circulating tumor cells underwent apoptosis because of detachment stress in the bloodstream, and their contents were released as circulating nucleic acids.
The quantitative assay of plasma RNA is feasible for direct clinical application as the test is not expensive (< US$30), assays have automation platforms, and only 0.2 ml of plasma (equivalent to 0.5 ml of whole blood) is needed. The assay, in the form of a noninvasive blood test, can provide prognostic information and is more practical than assays involving tissue specimens. The need for tissue specimens will make the test less useful for clinical applications, as tissue specimens may not be readily available: biopsies may have morbidity and mortality consequences, and surgical specimens are available only after the operation. A simple blood test is therefore more feasible.
The current data indicate, for the first time, that preoperative plasma transcript AA454543 RNA level can predict prognosis for HCC patients receiving curative partial hepatectomy. To consolidate the current findings, we have initiated a large-scale prospective study to examine, in parallel, other factors/biomarkers that have reported associations with cancer recurrence. This will enhance our understanding on the relative importance of each factor/biomarker and the formulation for accurate prognosis.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
- AFP
α-fetoprotein
Footnotes
The work was supported, in part, by grants from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKU 7296/00M and HKU 7392/03M) and the Seed Funding Program of The University of Hong Kong.
This article refers to supplementary materials, which are designated by “W” (i.e., Tables W1 and W2; Figures W1–W5) and are available online at www.bcdecker.com.
References
- 1.Anker P, Mulcahy H, Stroun M. Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum as a noninvasive investigation for cancer: time for large-scale clinical studies? Int J Cancer. 2003;103:149–152. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goessl C. Diagnostic potential of circulating nucleic acids for oncology. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2003;3:431–442. doi: 10.1586/14737159.3.4.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lo YM, Chiu RW. The biology and diagnostic applications of plasma RNA. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1022:135–139. doi: 10.1196/annals.1318.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silva JM, Dominguez G, Silva J, Garcia JM, Sanchez A, Rodriguez O, Provencio M, Espana P, Bonilla F. Detection of epithelial messenger RNA in the plasma of breast cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis tumor characteristics. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:2821–2825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen XQ, Bonnefoi H, Pelte MF, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Movarekhi S, Schaeffer P, Mulcahy HE, Meyer P, Stroun M, et al. Telomerase RNA as a detection marker in the serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3823–3826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kopreski MS, Benko FA, Kwak LW, Gocke CD. Detection of tumor messenger RNA in the serum of patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:1961–1965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lo KW, Lo YM, Leung SF, Tsang YS, Chan LY, Johnson PJ, Hjelm NM, Lee JC, Huang DP. Analysis of cell-free Epstein-Barr virus associated RNA in the plasma of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Chem. 1999;45(8 Pt 1):1292–1294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Novakovic S, Hocevar M, Zgajnar J, Besic N, Stegel V. Detection of telomerase RNA in the plasma of patients with breast cancer, malignant melanoma or thyroid cancer. Oncol Rep. 2004;11:245–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sueoka E, Sueoka N, Iwanaga K, Sato A, Suga K, Hayashi S, Nagasawa K, Nakachi K. Detection of plasma hnRNP B1 mRNA, a new cancer biomarker, in lung cancer patients by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Lung Cancer. 2005;48:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wong SC, Lo SF, Cheung MT, Ng KO, Tse CW, Lai BS, Lee KC, Lo YM. Quantification of plasma beta-catenin mRNA in colorectal cancer and adenoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1613–1617. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1168-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen X, Cheung ST, So S, Fan ST, Barry C, Higgins J, Lai KM, Ji J, Dudoit S, Ng IO, et al. Gene expression patterns in human liver cancers. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:1929–1939. doi: 10.1091/mbc.02-02-0023.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheung ST, Ho JC, Leung KL, Chen X, Fong DY, So S, Fan ST. Transcript AA454543 is a novel prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative partial hepatectomy. Neoplasia. 2005;7:91–98. doi: 10.1593/neo.04472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9067–9072. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.0454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–35. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M, editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 6th Ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002. Liver (including intrahepatic bile duct) pp. 131–138. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peng SY, Chen WJ, Lai PL, Jeng YM, Sheu JC, Hsu HC. High alpha-fetoprotein level correlates with high stage, early recurrence and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of hepatitis virus infection, age, p53 and beta-catenin mutations. Int J Cancer. 2004;112:44–50. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Belghiti J, Cortes A, Abdalla EK, Regimbeau JM, Prakash K, Durand F, Sommacale D, Dondero F, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A, et al. Resection prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:885–892. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000098621.74851.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Paterlini-Brechot P, Vona G, Brechot C. Circulating tumorous cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical impact and future directions. Semin Cancer Biol. 2000;10:241–249. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2000.0323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsumura M, Niwa Y, Kato N, Komatsu Y, Shiina S, Kawabe T, Kawase T, Toyoshima H, Ihori M, Shiratori Y, et al. Detection of alpha-fetoprotein mRNA, an indicator of hematogenous spreading hepatocellular carcinoma, in the circulation: a possible predictor of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1994;20:1418–1425. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840200607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hillaire S, Barbu V, Boucher E, Moukhtar M, Poupon R. Albumin messenger RNA as a marker of circulating hepatocytes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:239–242. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(94)95705-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kar S, Carr BI. Detection of liver cells in peripheral blood of patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1995;21:403–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Louha M, Poussin K, Ganne N, Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Nicolet J, Capron F, Soubrane O, Vons C, Pol S, et al. Spontaneous and iatrogenic spreading of liver-derived cells into peripheral blood of patients with primary liver cancer. Hepatology. 1997;26:998–1005. doi: 10.1002/hep.510260430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Funaki NO, Tanaka J, Seto SI, Kasamatsu T, Kaido T, Imamura M. Hematogenous spreading of hepatocellular carcinoma cells: possible participation in recurrence in the liver. Hepatology. 1997;25:564–568. doi: 10.1002/hep.510250312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gion T, Taketomi A, Shimada M, Shirabe K, Hasegawa H, Takenaka K, Sugimachi K. Perioperative change in albumin messenger RNA levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1998;28:1663–1668. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matsumura M, Shiratori Y, Niwa Y, Tanaka T, Ogura K, Okudaira T, Imamura M, Okano K, Shiina S, Omata M. Presence of alpha-fetoprotein mRNA in blood correlates with outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 1999;31:332–339. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(99)80232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ijichi M, Takayama T, Matsumura M, Shiratori Y, Omata M, Makuuchi M. Alpha-fetoprotein mRNA in the circulation as a predictor of postsurgical recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Hepatology. 2002;35:853–860. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.32100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wong IH, Lau WY, Leung T, Yeo W, Johnson PJ. Hematogenous dissemination of hepatocytes and tumor cells after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a quantitative analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:4021–4027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jeng KS, Sheen IS, Tsai YC. Circulating messenger RNA of alpha-fetoprotein: a possible risk factor of recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1055–1060. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.10.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lemoine A, Le Bricon T, Salvucci M, Azoulay D, Pham P, Raccuia J, Bismuth H, Debuire B. Prospective evaluation of circulating hepatocytes by alpha-fetoprotein mRNA in humans during liver surgery. Ann Surg. 1997;226:43–50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199707000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gross-Goupil M, Saffroy R, Azoulay D, Precetti S, Emile JF, Delvart V, Tindiliere F, Laurent A, Bellin MF, Bismuth H, et al. Real-time quantification of AFP mRNA to assess hematogenous dissemination after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:241–248. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000080959.95226.be. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kienle P, Weitz J, Klaes R, Koch M, Benner A, Lehnert T, Herfarth C, von Knebel Doeberitz M. Detection of isolated disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow and blood samples of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2000;135:213–218. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kopreski MS, Gocke CD. Cellular- versus extracellular-based assays. Comparing utility in DNA and RNA molecular marker assessment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;906:124–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sidransky D. Circulating DNA. What we know and what we need to learn. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;906:1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tsui NB, Ng EK, Lo YM. Stability of endogenous and added RNA in blood specimens, serum, and plasma. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1647–1653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hasselmann DO, Rappl G, Tilgen W, Reinhold U. Extracellular tyrosinase mRNA within apoptotic bodies is protected from degradation in human serum. Clin Chem. 2001;47:1488–1489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, Knippers R. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1659–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
