Abstract
Opitz syndrome (OS) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by defects of the ventral midline, including hypertelorism, cleft lip and palate, heart defects, and mental retardation. We recently identified the gene responsible for X-linked OS. The ubiquitously expressed gene product, MID1, is a member of the RING finger family. These proteins are characterized by an N-terminal tripartite protein–protein interaction domain and a conserved C terminus of unknown function. Unlike other RING finger proteins for which diverse cellular functions have been proposed, the function of MID1 is as yet undefined. By using the green fluorescent protein as a tag, we show here that MID1 is a microtubule-associated protein that influences microtubule dynamics in MID1-overexpressing cells. We confirm this observation by demonstrating a colocalization of MID1 and tubulin in subcellular fractions and the association of endogenous MID1 with microtubules after in vitro assembly. Furthermore, overexpressed MID1 proteins harboring mutations described in OS patients lack the capability to associate with microtubules, forming cytoplasmic clumps instead. These data give an idea of the possible molecular pathomechanism underlying the OS phenotype.
Opitz G/BBB syndrome (OS) is a congenital syndrome characterized by malformations involving several unrelated anatomical structures, all situated in the midline of the human body. Mental retardation associated with dysplasia of the corpus callosum, ocular hypertelorism (excessive distance between any paired organs, e. g. the eyes), cleft lip and cleft palate, laryngotracheo-esophageal fistulas, and genitourinary defects such as hypospadias are all prominent manifestations of the syndrome. Imperforate anus and hymen and cardiac abnormalities such as tetralogy of Fallot have also been described (1). By linkage analysis, two main gene loci, one on chromosome 22 and one on the X chromosome, were shown to be responsible for this heterogeneous disorder (2). Employing a positional cloning approach, we have recently identified a gene located at Xp22.3, designated MID1, and found that it is selectively mutated in patients suffering from Opitz syndrome (3).
The protein encoded by the MID1 gene comprises four separate domains common to the RING finger proteins. Therefore, MID1 represents a new member of this protein family. Three of the four conserved domains are part of an N-terminal tripartite motif consisting of the RING finger itself, a so-called B box (present in one or two copies), and an α-helical region capable of coiled-coil formation (4–6). Members of this protein family are involved in diverse cellular processes: Xenopus nuclear factor 7 (XNF7) was found to play an important role in dorsal/ventral patterning of the Xenopus embryo (7–9), whereas the promyelocytic protein (PML), the ret finger protein (RFP-1), and transcription intermediary factor (TIF-1) are protooncogenes (10–13). Furthermore, as some of the RING finger proteins are part of macromolecular complexes, the formation of which depends on an intact N terminus (11), the tripartite motif is thought to be involved in protein–protein interactions.
A second cluster of amino acids highly conserved between MID1 and five other RING finger proteins (3) is located in the C terminus. The function of this protein domain is largely unknown except for the C terminus of murine butyrophilin, which was reported to be specifically associated with a 150-kDa cytoplasmatic protein (14). Surprisingly, all of the mutations identified in OS patients so far are located in the C terminus of the MID1 protein (3, 15). This finding suggests that the C-terminal domain is critical for a functional MID1 protein.
The cellular localization of RING finger proteins has been shown to be very important for their specific functions. In an attempt to shed light on the function of the MID1 protein, we have studied its intracellular localization employing transfection of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion constructs into COS-7, MCF-7, and HeLa cells and into human fibroblasts. Unlike other RING finger proteins, MID1 was not found in the nucleus but was confined to the cytoplasm. More detailed analysis revealed a close association of MID1 with microtubules, whereas the introduction of mutations found in OS patients completely abolished microtubule association. Thus, our data establish a physiological role for MID1 in microtubule dynamics. At the same time, they suggest a possible pathomechanism for OS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
GFP Constructs and Site-Directed Mutagenesis.
GFP-fusion constructs were generated by using the CLONTECH GFP system employing pGFP-N3 for the C-terminal and pEGFP-C1 for the N-terminal MID1 fusion. Inserts were amplified with Stratagene Pfu polymerase in the appropriate buffer containing 1 mM MgCl2. Primers used for amplifying the complete translated region were GCTCAAGCTTCGATGGAAACAATGGAGTCAG and TCGAATTCTTCACGGCAGCTGCTCTGT for the N-terminal construct and GCTCAAGCTTCGATGGAAACACTGGAGTCAG and TCGAATTCTCGGCAGCTGCTCTGTGCA for the C-terminal MID1 construct. PCR products were digested with HindIII/EcoRI and subsequently isolated from low melting temperature agarose with the Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA) gel extraction kit.
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by using the QuickChange kit from Stratagene. All oligonucleotides used were HPLC-purified.
Tissue Culture and Microtubule Stability Assay.
COS-7 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and spread at 1 × 105 cells per well of a 6-well plate 1 day before transfection. Transfection was carried out following the CLONTECH protocol of the GFP system for liposome-mediated transfection by using Lipofectace (Gibco) at a ratio of 1.2:1 (liposome/vector). Expression was optimal 48 hours after transfection. For the microtubule stability assay, cells were incubated for 2 hours at increasing colcemid concentrations (range 50–400 ng/ml) and with 100 ng/ml of colcemid for 2–14 hours, respectively. The percentage of destroyed microtubules bundles was calculated by dividing the number of transfected cells with intact microtubules stained with indirect immunofluorescence by the total number of cells showing GFP–MID1-expression of one coverslip (350–500 cells counted per coverslip). This was done in three independent experiments.
MCF-7 cells, HeLa cells, and human fibroblasts were obtained from the Max-Planck Institute for Cell Biology (Ladenburg, Germany).
Family with OS and Mutation Analysis.
A fibroblast cell line from an aborted fetus with OS was established from skin biopsy material and grown in Ham’s F-10 (GIBCO and Sigma) nutrient medium with 20% fetal calf serum, 200 mM l-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. Before abortion, the mother of the affected fetus had undergone prenatal diagnosis because her first son (SW) had presented with clinical signs of Opitz syndrome. Subsequent molecular analysis in our lab by SSCP (single strand conformation polymorphism; ref. 16) and sequencing revealed a 4-bp deletion in the C-terminal exon of MID1. The same mutation was found in the fetus, and autopsy thereby confirmed the diagnosis of OS.
Primers used for the amplification of the affected exon of MID1 had the following sequences: ATGTGCAACATGGCTCATTG and GACACTTGTTCCACACGGTG.
Antibody Production.
For antibody production for MID1 detection, two peptides from the N terminus of MID1, GPNSPSETRRERAFD and LEHEDEKVNM, were synthesized, pooled, and used for rabbit immunization. After four boosts at 3-week intervals, high-titer serum was collected at 12 weeks post immunization. The antibody obtained was affinity-purified by chromatography on immobilized peptide CGNSPSETRRERAFD coupled to Sulfolink coupling gel (Pierce). Binding specificity was established via Western blots with protein expressed in Escherichia coli and in immunofluorescent experiments with MID1-overexpressing cells in the presence and absence of competing peptide. The antiserum recognized a single band migrating at 72 kDa, which was specifically suppressed by addition of antigenic peptide. The affinity-purified antibody was used with a titer of 1:25 for Western blots and 1:10 for immunofluorescence.
Immunofluorescence.
Anti-tubulin antibodies were obtained from Serotec (MCA77S and MCA78S). For immunofluorescence, we used a modified standard protocol as described (17), with PBS buffer replaced by 1.2× PEM buffer (10× PEM contains 1M Pipes, 0.05M EGTA, and 0.02M MgCl2, pH 7.0) to protect the microtubules. As a control, the anti-MID1 antibody was preincubated with 100 μg/ml of each antigenic peptide for 30 minutes at room temperature.
Cell Fractionation and Immunoblot Analysis.
Subcellular fractions of 1 × 107 primary embryonic fibroblasts were prepared as described (18) based on three differential centrifugation steps (1,000 × g, 17,500 × g, and 100,000 × g). Fractions were separated on a 7.5% SDS gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and subsequently incubated with an affinity-purified anti-MID1 and two anti-tubulin antibodies (see above). Blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Fab fragments (Amersham Pharmacia) and developed with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Pharmacia) as specified by the manufacturer.
In Vitro Assembly of Microtubules.
HeLa microtubules were prepared from 4 × 107 cells according to a protocol described previously (19) by using Taxol to facilitate microtubule assembly. MID1/GFP-overexpressing COS-7 cells (1 × 106) were treated with 200 ng/ml colcemid overnight to destroy the microtubules, homogenized in 5 vol of microtubule assembly buffer (19), and centrifuged at 60,000 × g for 60 min. The supernatant was mixed with Taxol, GTP, and HeLa microtubules and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The pellet of the subsequent ultracentrifugation of 30 min at 40,000 × g was washed once with Taxol-containing assembly buffer and analyzed by Western blot analysis. Membranes were probed sequentially with affinity-purified anti-MID1 (see above) and anti-GFP purchased from CLONTECH. In vitro assembly of endogenous MID1 protein was performed with cytosol of 1.7 × 107 primary embryonic fibroblasts prepared by using the same protocol as described above.
RESULTS
To study the intracellular localization of the MID1 protein, we assembled two different GFP-MID1 fusion constructs. Both constructs, an N-terminal GFP fusion and a C-terminal GFP fusion, were transfected into four different cell types, i. e. COS-7, MCF-7, and HeLa cells and primary human fibroblasts. Fluorescence microscopy revealed reticular cytoplasmic structures similar to cytoskeletal filaments in all cell types transfected with the C-terminal GFP fusion protein (Fig. 1A). Identical filamentous structures were observed on overexpression of native MID1 protein in the same cell types and subsequent indirect immunfluorescence with a specific anti-MID1 antibody (data not shown). The filaments could not be extracted with Triton X-100 up to a concentration of 1% (vol/vol). The nuclei were clearly devoid of filamentous structures and did not show any other fluorescent signal (Fig. 1A). Cells transfected with the N-terminal GFP construct showed diffuse cytoplasmic clumps (data not shown) which may be because of steric inhibitory effects of the GFP moiety on the C-terminal domain of MID1 subsequently shown to be critical for cytoskeletal association (see below).
We next sought to define the cytoskeletal localization of MID1 more precisely. Whereas association of GFP-MID1 with actin fibers and intermediate filaments could be clearly excluded by using the corresponding antibodies (data not shown), indirect immunofluorescence with a mixture of two different rat anti-tubulin antibodies revealed a perfect colocalization of GFP-MID1 with microtubules in COS-7, MCF-7, and HeLa cells and in primary human fibroblasts (Fig. 1B). The microtubules in MID1-transfected cells, in contrast to the microtubule pattern in wild-type cells, seem to be bundled by the overexpressed protein (Fig. 1 A and B).
In a separate set of experiments, endogenous MID1 and tubulin were found to cofractionate in the same subcellular fractions (low-, medium-, and high-speed supernatants) of primary embryonic fibroblasts prepared by differential centrifugation (18), as detected by an affinity-purified anti-MID1 antibody (Fig. 1C, Upper) and two anti-tubulin antibodies in a Western blot analysis (Fig. 1C, Lower). To further confirm the association of native endogenous MID1 with microtubules, we reassembled microtubules purified from HeLa cells in the presence of cytosol derived from primary embryonic fibroblasts (19), followed by ultracentrifugation. The resulting microtubule-containing pellet was resuspended in SDS/PAGE buffer, and 20 μg of protein was analyzed by Western blotting. An aliquot of the supernatant and the cytosol containing the same amount of protein were loaded on the same gel. The MID1-specific affinity-purified antibody detected a single band of approximate 72 kDa, the size of endogenous MID1, in the pellet containing the microtubules, but not in the supernatant (Fig. 1D). The band detected in the cytosol was very weak because of the low expression level of endogenous MID1. Comparison of the cytosol and the microtubule-containing pellet demonstrate a specific enrichment of MID1 in the microtubule-containing pellet.
For further characterization of the microtubule bundles obtained in GFP-MID1-overexpressing cells, we incubated transfected COS-7 cells for 2 hours with increasing concentrations of colcemid, which is known to induce the depolymerization of microtubules. A concentration of 50 ng/ml, which destroys 100% of the microtubules in wild-type cells (ref. 20, and data not shown), did not affect microtubules in GFP-MID1-overexpressing cells. Higher concentrations of colcemid lowered the percentage of cells with intact microtubules, but even at concentrations as high as 400 ng/ml, eight times the concentration sufficient to destroy all microtubules in nonrecombinant cells, more than 30% of the microtubule bundles remained intact in the presence of GFP-MID1 (Fig. 2A). Transfected COS-7 cells were also incubated for varying time periods ranging from 2 hours to overnight at a fixed colcemid concentration (100 ng/ml). Again, although an increasing duration of colcemid treatment did reduce the percentage of transfected cells with intact microtubules, even overnight incubation did not destroy all microtubule bundles in the overexpressing cells (Fig. 2B). Exposure to low temperatures also revealed a much higher stability of the microtubules in GFP-MID1-overexpressing cells compared with normal cells (data not shown). Overexpression of GFP alone did not cause any microtubule association under any of the conditions described (data not shown).
As all mutations found in OS patients are clustered near the C terminus of MID1 (3, 15), we hypothesized that this part of the protein plays an important functional role. In this regard, it is of interest that we have identified the most C-terminally located mutation found to date, which is a 4-bp deletion starting at nucleotide 1,986 and resulting in a frameshift and a premature stop codon at nucleotide 2,048 that truncated the MID1 gene product by 47 aa. This mutation was found in a male infant with OS, his heterozygous mother, and in chorionic villus material obtained by biopsy at 11 weeks gestation in a subsequent pregnancy with a male fetus (Fig. 4).
To study the influence of the C terminus on the cellular localisation of MID1 (Fig. 3), we designed three different constructs. One construct totally lacked the C terminus (Fig. 3A), whereas the others simulated gene products expressed in two OS patients. These two mutations were the 4-bp deletion at nucleotide 1,986 (amino acid 600) (Fig. 3B) described above and an in-frame 3-bp deletion leading to the loss of Met-438 (nucleotide 1,497) of MID1 (3)(Fig. 3C). These mutations were introduced into the GFP-MID1 plasmid by using site-directed mutagenesis. Truncation of the C terminus completely abolished the binding of the fusion protein to microtubules. Instead, the truncated protein formed clumps in the cytoplasm of the transfected cells (Fig. 3A). The same effect was observed with a construct carrying the 4-bp deletion (Fig. 3B), whereas the deletion of Met-438, although also causing clump formation, preserved some microtubule-binding activity of the fusion protein (Fig. 3C). For further confirmation of this finding, purified microtubules from HeLa cells were reassembled in the presence of cytosol from COS-7 cells transfected with either wild-type GFP-MID1 or the GFP-MID1 construct carrying the 4-bp deletion followed by ultracentrifugation (see Materials and Methods). Fifteen micrograms of the resulting pellets (Fig. 3D, lanes 3 and 7) and the same amounts of protein from the cytosols (Fig. 3D, lanes 2 and 6) from each experiment were analyzed by Western blot. In both fractions, a band of ≈100 kDa, the expected size of GFP-MID1, was detected with a specific anti-GFP antibody on expression of the wild-type GFP-MID1, but not of the GFP-MID1 construct carrying the mutation (Fig. 3D). Comparison of the cytosol and the microtubule-containing pellet of the experiment carried out with the wild-type GFP-MID1 again demonstrates a specific enrichment of MID1 in the microtubule-containing pellet. In the case of the mutant, all protein is pelleted with the initial step of ultracentrifugation (data not shown), presumably because of the formation of cytoplasmic clumps. The supernatants of the two experiments were acetone-precipitated, resuspended in SDS/PAGE buffer, and loaded onto the same gel (Fig. 3D, lanes 4 and 8). A small portion of protein was found in the supernatant of the wild-type-expressing cells, but no protein was detected in the supernatant of the mutant-expressing cells. Cell homogenate protein (100 μg) from both experiments loaded onto the same gel shows similar expression levels of the wild-type and the mutant GFP/MID1 proteins (Fig. 3D, lanes 1 and 5).
The formation of cytoplasmic clumps was assigned to a defective MID1 C terminus by studying the effect of several N-terminal mutations with a series of GFP-MID1 constructs. In these studies we sequentially mutated the domains of the N-terminal motif, i.e., the RING finger, the two B boxes, and the coiled-coil domain. None of these mutations caused formation of cytoplasmic clumps. Instead, all of the resulting proteins associated with microtubules, although diffuse cytoplasmic background staining suggested a weakened binding (data not shown).
To clarify whether the formation of cytoplasmic clumps might indeed be relevant to the pathogenesis of OS, an embryonic fibroblast cell line was established from the aborted OS fetus (see above, Fig. 4). A MID1-specific, affinity-purified antibody was used in conjunction with a Cy3-labeled secondary antibody to analyze these fibroblasts by indirect immunofluorescence. In the cells of the OS fetus, cytoplasmic clumps of various sizes were detected (Fig. 4A), which were not found in the cytosol of a fibroblast cell line derived from a fetus of the same gestational age. Preincubation of the antibody with antigenic N-terminal peptides abolished the detection of cytoplasmic clumps (Fig. 4B), demonstrating the specificity of the signal. Our inability to detect filamentous structures in the control cell line may be because of the much lower focal concentration of the fluorescent signal finely distributed alongside the microtubules. In OS fibroblasts, the MID1 protein might be visible because of a much better signal-to-noise ratio caused by the accumulation of the protein in the clumps.
Cell-fractionation experiments carried out with embryonic fibroblasts from the aborted OS fetus showed that a large fraction of the aberrant protein precipitated with the high-speed pellet P3 (Fig. 4C), indicating reduced solubility of the cytoplasmic clumps as compared with the native protein. In fibroblasts of the OS patient, the concentration of mutant MID1 protein was found to be similar to that of intact MID1 protein, as shown in Fig. 1C. Furthermore, a microtubule coassembly assay with extracts from OS fibroblasts revealed that the mutated MID1 protein that stays soluble after the initial ultracentrifugation step lacks microtubule-binding ability (Fig. 4D).
Last, comparison of microtubule stability to depolymerizing drugs such as colcemid and nocodazol in the OS embryonic fibroblasts and the age-matched control cell line did not reveal any significant difference (data not shown). This is not surprising, however, given that most cell types in OS patients, including fibroblasts, are apparently unaffected by a dysfunctional or nonfunctional MID1 protein, due to as-yet-unidentified compensating mechanisms. Moreover, the microtubule stabilization property of MID1 observed in overexpressing cells may also critically depend on expression levels. In this regard, it is of interest that murine MID1 was recently shown to be significantly higher expressed in ventral midline structures than in any other tissue (20).
DISCUSSION
The equilibrium of microtubule assembly and disassembly that influences essential cellular processes such as cell cycle, axonal outgrowth, and cellular migration (21) is tightly regulated by several microtubule-associated proteins. The filaments that result from transfecting a cDNA coding for a GFP-MID1 fusion protein into several cell lines (Fig. 1) are strongly reminiscent of the bundled microtubules seen in cells transfected with tau or MAP2 cDNAs (22–24), which are the most important regulators of microtubule dynamics in the nervous system. The loss of the microtubule-binding capability of tau protein has been shown to play a major role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (25, 26). Similar to MID1, overexpressed tau stabilizes nascent bundles and has a protective effect against microtubule-depolymerizing agents such as colcemid (21). The protection of the GFP-MID1-covered microtubules against a cold stimulus was also similar to the effect reported for other microtubule-associated proteins (27).
A defective MID1 gene product lacking its microtubule-stabilizing function would be assumed to have dramatic consequences for the cells affected. Still, mice homozygously deficient for MAP-type proteins display widely varying phenotypes ranging from almost no impairment seen in tau knock-out mice (28) to severe disorders in MAP1B knock-out mice which suffer from numerous neuronal abnormalities (29). Different MAPs may, at least in part, be able to substitute for each other, thus compensating for the loss of function of individual proteins. This may also hold for most tissues of OS patients, where noncompensated functional deficits are confined to special cells of the developing ventral midline. It also is possible that intact MID1 function depends on the expression level. A recent paper describes significantly higher expression levels of MID1 in cells that undergo mesenchyme–epithelium transformation, which is a characteristic process during ventral midline development (20). As it is impossible to obtain human cells from the developing ventral midline undergoing mesenchymal–epithelial transformation, a mouse model is of high importance for extended in vivo studies of the function of MID1.
All MID1 mutations in OS patients reported to date affect the protein’s C terminus (3, 15) (Fig. 4). Furthermore, we observed the formation of cytoplasmic clumps only in the presence of C-terminally mutated MID1, but not in the presence of N-terminal MID1 mutants. Therefore, the clinical syndrome may involve an aberrant function of MID1, rather than simply its absence. Oligomerization with other proteins could exert a dominant negative effect by sequestering these proteins from their functional site. Alternatively, MID1-induced clumps may disturb microtubule homeostasis, analogous to the situation in Alzheimer’s disease, where the abnormally expressed microtubule associated protein tau forms intracellular filamentous deposits leading to the degeneration of neuronal cells (25, 26, 30–32). Thus, it is conceivable that the clumps in the cytoplasm of OS patients mechanically interfere with cellular functions such as differentiation and cell movement. Actively migrating cells, such as those exiting the neural crest to shape the ventral midline, would be especially vulnerable to the detrimental effects of cytoplasmic clotting and/or microtubule dysregulation. A similar pathomechanism seems to play a role in lissencephaly, where the responsible gene product, Lis1, has also been shown to be highly involved in microtubule dynamics (33).
Acknowledgments
We thank “Family W.” for their participitation and consent for publication. We thank Dr. Pippa Kyle for the prenatal procedures, Susann Freier, Ulrike Traub, and David Demege for tissue culturing, and Sabine Grüb for technical assistance. We thank Prof. Dr. M. Schweiger and Prof. Dr. Igor Dawid for critical discussion and Dr. D. Hirsch-Kauffmann Jokl for a thorough reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions. The work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant RO389/17-2 (to H.H.R.).
ABBREVIATIONS
- OS
Opitz syndrome
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings Office.
References
- 1.Robin N H, Opitz J M, Muenke M. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62:305–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960329)62:3<305::AID-AJMG20>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robin N, Feldman L J, Aronson A L, Mitchell H, Weksberg R, Leonard C, Burton B, Josephson K, Laxóra R, Aleck V, et al. Nat Genet. 1995;11:459–461. doi: 10.1038/ng1295-459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Quaderi N A, Schwerges S, Laudenz K, Franco B, Rugarli E, Berger W, Feldman G, Volta M, Andolfi G, Gilgenkrantz S, et al. Nat Genet. 1997;17:285–291. doi: 10.1038/ng1197-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reddy B A, Etkin L D, Freemont P S. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992;17:344–345. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90308-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Freemont P S, Hanson I M, Trowsdale J. Cell. 1991;64:483–484. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90229-r. (lett.). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Freemont, P. S. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 174–192.
- 7.Li X, Etkin L D. J Cell Sci. 1993;105:389–395. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.2.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li X, Shou W, Kloc M, Reddy B A, Etkin L D. J Cell Biol. 1994;124:7–17. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gong S-G, Reddy B A, Etkin L D. Mech Dev. 1995;52:305–318. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00410-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weis K, Ramboud S, Lavau C, Janson J, Carvalho T, Carmo-Fonseca M, Lamond A, Dejean A. Cell. 1994;76:345–356. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90341-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dyck J A, Maul G G, Miller W H, Chen J D, Kakizuka A, Evans R M. Cell. 1994;76:333–343. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90340-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Isomura T, Tamiya-Koizumi K, Suzuki M, Yoshida S, Taniguchi M, Matsuyama M, Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Takahashi M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:5305–5310. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.20.5305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Le Douarin B, Zedal C, Gurnier J M, Lentz Y, Tora B, Henry D, Gronemeyer H, Chambor P, Losson R. EMBO J. 1995;14:2020–2033. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ishii T, Aoki N, Noda A, Adachi T, Nakamura R, Matsuda T. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1245:285–292. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(95)00102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gaudenz K, Roessler E, Quaderi N, Franco B, Feldman G, Gasser D L, Wiltuer B, Horzt J, Martini E, Opitz J, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:703–710. doi: 10.1086/302010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2766–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sittler A, Devys D, Weber C, Mandel J-L. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:95–102. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gary E G, Whittaker V P. J Anat. 1962;96:79–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kimble M, Khodjakov A L, Kuriyama R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7693–7697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dalzotto L, Quaderi N, Elliott R, Lingertelter P, Carrel L, Valsecchi V, Montini E, Yen C, Chapman V, Kalchera I, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:489–499. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.3.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hirokawa N. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:74–81. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barlow S, Gonzalez-Garay M L, West R R, Olmsted J B, Cabral F. J Cell Biol. 1994;124:101–1029. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gustke N, Trinczek B, Biernat J, Mandelkow E M, Mandelkow E. Biochemistry. 1994;33:9511–9522. doi: 10.1021/bi00198a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Travis G H. Nature (London) 1991;349:24. doi: 10.1038/349024b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alonso A C, Grundke-Iqbal I, Barra H S, Iqbal K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:298–303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alonso A C, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K. Nat Med. 1996;2:783–787. doi: 10.1038/nm0796-783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harada A, Oguchi K, Okabe S, Kuno J, Terada S, Ohshima T, Sato-Yoshitake R, Takei Y, Noda T, Hirokawa N. Nature (London) 1994;369:488–491. doi: 10.1038/369488a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Edelmann W, Zervas M, Costello P, Roback L, Fischer I, Hammarbach J A, Cowan N, Davis P, Wainer B, Kucherlapati R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1270–1275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hall G F, Yao J, Lee G. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94:4733–4738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bosc C, Cronk J D, Pirollet F, Watterson D M, Haiech J, Job D, Margolis R L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:2125–2130. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goedert M, Jakes R, Spillantin M L, Klasegawa M, Smith M J, Crowther R A. Nature (London) 1996;383:550–553. doi: 10.1038/383550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schweers O, Mandelkow E-M, Biernat J, Mandelkow E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:8463–8467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sapir T, Elbaum M, Reiner O. EMBO J. 1997;16:6977–6984. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.23.6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]