Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1997 Oct;115(2):737–751. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.2.737

Ethylene-Mediated Programmed Cell Death during Maize Endosperm Development of Wild-Type and shrunken2 Genotypes.

T E Young 1, D R Gallie 1, D A DeMason 1
PMCID: PMC158534  PMID: 12223841

Abstract

We characterized the progression of programmed cell death during maize (Zea mays L.) endosperm development of starchy (Su; wild-type) and shrunken2 (sh2) genotypes and tested the involve ment of ethylene in mediating this process. Histological and viability staining demonstrated that endosperm cell death was initiated earlier and progressed more rapidly in sh2 endosperm compared with Su endosperm. Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation accompanied endosperm cell death and occurred more extensively in sh2 endosperm. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid levels peaked approximately 16 d after pollination (dap) in Su endosperm and gradually decreased during subsequent development, whereas two large 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid peaks were observed in sh2 endosperm, the first between 16 and 20 dap and the second at 36 dap. Ethylene levels were elevated in sh2 kernels compared with Su kernels, with an initial peak 20 dap approximately 3-fold higher than in Su kernels and a second peak 36 dap approximately 5-fold higher than that in Su kernels. Ethylene treatment of Su kernels resulted in earlier and more extensive endosperm cell death and DNA fragmentation. Aminoethoxyvinylglycine treatment of sh2 kernels reduced the extent of DNA fragmentation. We conclude that ethylene is involved in triggering programmed cell death in developing maize endosperm and is responsible for the aberrant phenotype of sh2 kernels.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Apte S. S., Mattei M. G., Seldin M. F., Olsen B. R. The highly conserved defender against the death 1 (DAD1) gene maps to human chromosome 14q11-q12 and mouse chromosome 14 and has plant and nematode homologs. FEBS Lett. 1995 Apr 24;363(3):304–306. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00321-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arends M. J., Morris R. G., Wyllie A. H. Apoptosis. The role of the endonuclease. Am J Pathol. 1990 Mar;136(3):593–608. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachmair A., Becker F., Masterson R. V., Schell J. Perturbation of the ubiquitin system causes leaf curling, vascular tissue alterations and necrotic lesions in a higher plant. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4543–4549. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07906.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry M. A., Eastman A. Endonuclease activation during apoptosis: the role of cytosolic Ca2+ and pH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992 Jul 31;186(2):782–789. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)90814-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhave M. R., Lawrence S., Barton C., Hannah L. C. Identification and molecular characterization of shrunken-2 cDNA clones of maize. Plant Cell. 1990 Jun;2(6):581–588. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cass L. G., Kirven K. A., Christoffersen R. E. Isolation and characterization of a cellulase gene family member expressed during avocado fruit ripening. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Aug;223(1):76–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00315799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins R. J., Harmon B. V., Gobé G. C., Kerr J. F. Internucleosomal DNA cleavage should not be the sole criterion for identifying apoptosis. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 Apr;61(4):451–453. doi: 10.1080/09553009214551201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dietrich R. A., Delaney T. P., Uknes S. J., Ward E. R., Ryals J. A., Dangl J. L. Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell. 1994 May 20;77(4):565–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90218-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Earnshaw W. C. Apoptosis: lessons from in vitro systems. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;5(6):217–220. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher D. B. Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie. 1968;16(1):92–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00306214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuchs Y., Lieberman M. Effects of Kinetin, IAA, and Gibberellin on Ethylene Production, and Their Interactions in Growth of Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1968 Dec;43(12):2029–2036. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.12.2029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerschenson L. E., Rotello R. J. Apoptosis: a different type of cell death. FASEB J. 1992 Apr;6(7):2450–2455. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gonzales J. W., Rhodes A. M., Dickinson D. B. Carbohydrate and enzymic characterization of a high sucrose sugary inbred line of sweet corn. Plant Physiol. 1976 Jul;58(1):28–32. doi: 10.1104/pp.58.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenberg J. T., Ausubel F. M. Arabidopsis mutants compromised for the control of cellular damage during pathogenesis and aging. Plant J. 1993 Aug;4(2):327–341. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Greenberg J. T. Programmed cell death: a way of life for plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 29;93(22):12094–12097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanley K. M., Meir S., Bramlage W. J. Activity of Ageing Carnation Flower Parts and the Effects of 1-(Malonylamino)cyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid-Induced Ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1989 Nov;91(3):1126–1130. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hannah L. C., Nelson O. E., Jr Characterization of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from shrunken-2 and brittle-2 mutants of maize. Biochem Genet. 1976 Aug;14(7-8):547–560. doi: 10.1007/BF00485834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. He C. J., Morgan P. W., Drew M. C. Transduction of an Ethylene Signal Is Required for Cell Death and Lysis in the Root Cortex of Maize during Aerenchyma Formation Induced by Hypoxia. Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct;112(2):463–472. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.2.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hengartner M. O., Horvitz H. R. The ins and outs of programmed cell death during C. elegans development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Aug 30;345(1313):243–246. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jackson M. B., Osborne D. J. Ethylene, the natural regulator of leaf abscission. Nature. 1970 Mar 14;225(5237):1019–1022. doi: 10.1038/2251019a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. James M. G., Robertson D. S., Myers A. M. Characterization of the maize gene sugary1, a determinant of starch composition in kernels. Plant Cell. 1995 Apr;7(4):417–429. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.4.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiao X. Z., Philosoph-Hadas S., Su L. Y., Yang S. F. The Conversion of 1-(Malonylamino)cyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid to 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid in Plant Tissues. Plant Physiol. 1986 Jun;81(2):637–641. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kerr J. F., Gobé G. C., Winterford C. M., Harmon B. V. Anatomical methods in cell death. Methods Cell Biol. 1995;46:1–27. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61921-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lamb C. J. Plant disease resistance genes in signal perception and transduction. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):419–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90106-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lau O. L., Yang S. F. Mechanism of a Synergistic Effect of Kinetin on Auxin-induced Ethylene Production: Suppression of Auxin Conjugation. Plant Physiol. 1973 Jun;51(6):1011–1014. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.6.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levine A., Pennell R. I., Alvarez M. E., Palmer R., Lamb C. Calcium-mediated apoptosis in a plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Curr Biol. 1996 Apr 1;6(4):427–437. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00510-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lopes M. A., Larkins B. A. Endosperm origin, development, and function. Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1383–1399. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lur H. S., Setter T. L. Role of Auxin in Maize Endosperm Development (Timing of Nuclear DNA Endoreduplication, Zein Expression, and Cytokinin). Plant Physiol. 1993 Sep;103(1):273–280. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.1.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin M. N., Cohen J. D., Saftner R. A. A new 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid-conjugating activity in tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 1995 Nov;109(3):917–926. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. O'Donnell PJ, Calvert C, Atzorn R, Wasternack C, Leyser HMO, Bowles DJ. Ethylene as a Signal Mediating the Wound Response of Tomato Plants. Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1914–1917. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan D., Nelson O. E. A debranching enzyme deficiency in endosperms of the sugary-1 mutants of maize. Plant Physiol. 1984 Feb;74(2):324–328. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Payton S., Fray R. G., Brown S., Grierson D. Ethylene receptor expression is regulated during fruit ripening, flower senescence and abscission. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Sep;31(6):1227–1231. doi: 10.1007/BF00040839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Redgwell R. J., Fry S. C. Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase Activity Increases during Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) Ripening (Implications for Fruit Softening). Plant Physiol. 1993 Dec;103(4):1399–1406. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ryerson D. E., Heath M. C. Cleavage of Nuclear DNA into Oligonucleosomal Fragments during Cell Death Induced by Fungal Infection or by Abiotic Treatments. Plant Cell. 1996 Mar;8(3):393–402. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Saab I. N., Sachs M. M. A flooding-induced xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase homolog in maize is responsive to ethylene and associated with aerenchyma. Plant Physiol. 1996 Sep;112(1):385–391. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.1.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Styer R. C., Cantliffe D. J. Dependence of Seed Vigor during Germination on Carbohydrate Source in Endosperm Mutants of Maize. Plant Physiol. 1984 Sep;76(1):196–200. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.1.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsai C. Y., Larkins B. A., Glover D. V. Interaction of the opaque-2 gene with starch-forming mutant genes on the synthesis of zein in maize endosperm. Biochem Genet. 1978 Oct;16(9-10):883–896. doi: 10.1007/BF00483740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H., Li J., Bostock R. M., Gilchrist D. G. Apoptosis: A Functional Paradigm for Programmed Plant Cell Death Induced by a Host-Selective Phytotoxin and Invoked during Development. Plant Cell. 1996 Mar;8(3):375–391. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang M., Oppedijk B. J., Lu X., Van Duijn B., Schilperoort R. A. Apoptosis in barley aleurone during germination and its inhibition by abscisic acid. Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Dec;32(6):1125–1134. doi: 10.1007/BF00041396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ward E. R., Uknes S. J., Williams S. C., Dincher S. S., Wiederhold D. L., Alexander D. C., Ahl-Goy P., Metraux J. P., Ryals J. A. Coordinate Gene Activity in Response to Agents That Induce Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell. 1991 Oct;3(10):1085–1094. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.10.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wyllie A. H., Morris R. G., Smith A. L., Dunlop D. Chromatin cleavage in apoptosis: association with condensed chromatin morphology and dependence on macromolecular synthesis. J Pathol. 1984 Jan;142(1):67–77. doi: 10.1002/path.1711420112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wyllie A. H. The genetic regulation of apoptosis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Feb;5(1):97–104. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu Y. B., Yang S. F. Auxin-induced Ethylene Production and Its Inhibition by Aminoethyoxyvinylglycine and Cobalt Ion. Plant Physiol. 1979 Dec;64(6):1074–1077. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.6.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES