Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1997 Nov;115(3):1083–1088. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.3.1083

Characterization of the Variation Potential in Sunflower.

B Stankovic 1, T Zawadzki 1, E Davies 1
PMCID: PMC158572  PMID: 12223859

Abstract

A major candidate for intercellular signaling in higher plants is the stimulus-induced systemic change in membrane potential known as variation potential (VP). We investigated the mechanism of occurrence and long-distance propagation of VP in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. Here we present evidence of the relationship among injury-induced changes in xylem tension, turgor pressure, and electrical potential. Although locally applied wounding did trigger a change in membrane potential, it evoked even faster changes in tissue deformation, apparently resulting from pressure surges rapidly transmitted through the xylem and experienced throughout the plant. Externally applied pressure mimicked flame wounding by triggering an electrical response resembling VP. Our findings suggest that VP in sunflower is not a propagating change in electrical potential and not the consequence of chemicals transmitted via the xylem, affecting ligand-modulated ion channels. Instead, VP appears to result from the surge in pressure in the xylem causing a change in activity of mechanosensitive, stretch-responsive ion channels or pumps in adjacent, living cells. The ensuing ion flux evokes local plasma membrane depolarization, which is monitored extracellularly as VP.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (594.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davies E. Intercellular and intracellular signals and their transduction via the plasma membrane-cytoskeleton interface. Semin Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;4(2):139–147. doi: 10.1006/scel.1993.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gradmann D. "Metabolic" action potentials in Acetabularia. J Membr Biol. 1976 Oct 20;29(1-2):23–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01868950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Imagawa K., Toko K., Ezaki S., Hayashi K., Yamafuji K. Electrical Potentials during Gravitropism in Bean Epicotyls. Plant Physiol. 1991 Sep;97(1):193–196. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.1.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peña-Cortés H., Fisahn J., Willmitzer L. Signals involved in wound-induced proteinase inhibitor II gene expression in tomato and potato plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4106–4113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schroeder J. I., Hedrich R. Involvement of ion channels and active transport in osmoregulation and signaling of higher plant cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 May;14(5):187–192. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90272-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stahlberg R., Cosgrove D. J. Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. II. Long-distance effects are caused by the release of xylem pressure. Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18:33–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stahlberg R., Cosgrove D. J. Rapid alterations in growth rate and electrical potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings. Planta. 1992 Jul;187(4):523–531. doi: 10.1007/BF00199972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stahlberg R., Cosgrove D. J. The Propagation of Slow Wave Potentials in Pea Epicotyls. Plant Physiol. 1997 Jan;113(1):209–217. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.1.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stanković B., Davies E. Both action potentials and variation potentials induce proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. FEBS Lett. 1996 Jul 29;390(3):275–279. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00672-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vian A., Henry-Vian C., Schantz R., Ledoigt G., Frachisse J. M., Desbiez M. O., Julien J. L. Is membrane potential involved in calmodulin gene expression after external stimulation in plants? FEBS Lett. 1996 Feb 12;380(1-2):93–96. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wayne R. The excitability of plant cells: with a special emphasis on characean internodal cells. Bot Rev. 1994 Jul-Sep;60(3):265–367. doi: 10.1007/BF02960261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES