Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 Jan;101(1):89–96. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.1.89

Dissipation of the Proton Electrochemical Potential in Intact Chloroplasts (II. The pH Gradient Monitored by Cytochrome f Reduction Kinetics).

J N Nishio 1, J Whitmarsh 1
PMCID: PMC158651  PMID: 12231669

Abstract

The potency of various uncouplers for collapsing the light-induced pH gradient across thylakoid membranes in intact chloroplasts was investigated by time-resolved optical spectroscopy. The thylakoid transmembrane pH gradient ([delta]pH) was monitored indirectly by measuring the rate of cytochrome (Cyt) f reduction following a light flash of sufficient duration to create a sizable [delta]pH. The results show that the rate of Cyt f reduction is controlled in part by the internal pH of the thylakoid inner aqueous space. At pH values from 6.5 to 8.0, the Cyt f reduction rate was maximal, whereas at lower pH values from 6.5 to 5.5 the reduction rate decreased to 25% of the maximal rate. The ability of three uncouplers, nigericin, carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, and gramicidin, to accelerate the rate of Cyt f reduction was determined for intact chloroplasts isolated from spinach (Spinacia oleracea). The efficacy of the uncouplers for collapsing the [delta]pH was determined using the empirical relationship between the [delta]pH and the Cyt f reduction rate. For intact chloroplasts, nigericin was the most effective uncoupler, followed by carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, which interacted strongly with bovine serum albumin. Gramicidin D, even at high gramicidin:chlorophyll ratios, did not completely collapse the pH gradient, probably because it partitions in the envelope membranes and does not enter the intact chloroplast.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (838.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cline K., Fulsom D. R., Viitanen P. V. An imported thylakoid protein accumulates in the stroma when insertion into thylakoids is inhibited. J Biol Chem. 1989 Aug 25;264(24):14225–14232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dilley R. A., Schreiber U. Correlation between membrane-localized protons and flash-driven ATP formation in chloroplast thylakoids. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1984 Jun;16(3):173–193. doi: 10.1007/BF00751048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dolan E., Hind G. Kinetics of the reduction and oxidation of cytochromes b6 and f in isolated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Sep 20;357(3):380–385. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flügge U. I., Hinz G. Energy dependence of protein translocation into chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Nov 3;160(3):563–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb10075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giersch C., Heber U., Kobayashi Y., Inoue Y., Shibata K., Heldt H. W. Energy charge, phosphorylation potential and proton motive force in chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Mar 7;590(1):59–73. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90146-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graan T., Ort D. R. Initial events in the regulation of electron transfer in chloroplasts. The role of the membrane potential. J Biol Chem. 1983 Mar 10;258(5):2831–2836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jensen R. G., Bassham J. A. Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Oct;56(4):1095–1101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.4.1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karlish S. J., Avron M. Energy transfer inhibition and ion movements in isolated chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem. 1971 May 11;20(1):51–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01361.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee W. J., Whitmarsh J. Photosynthetic apparatus of pea thylakoid membranes : response to growth light intensity. Plant Physiol. 1989 Mar;89(3):932–940. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.3.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moroney P. M., Scholes T. A., Hinkle P. C. Effect of membrane potential and pH gradient on electron transfer in cytochrome oxidase. Biochemistry. 1984 Oct 9;23(21):4991–4997. doi: 10.1021/bi00316a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mould R. M., Robinson C. A proton gradient is required for the transport of two lumenal oxygen-evolving proteins across the thylakoid membrane. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jul 5;266(19):12189–12193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NEUMANN J., JAGENDORF A. T. LIGHT-INDUCED PH CHANGES RELATED PHOSPHORYLATION BY CHLOROPLASTS. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1964 Jul;107:109–119. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(64)90276-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nishio J. N., Whitmarsh J. Dissipation of the proton electrochemical potential in intact and lysed chloroplasts : I. The electrical potential. Plant Physiol. 1991 Feb;95(2):522–528. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.2.522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ort D. R., Dilley R. A. Photophosphorylation as a function of illumination time. I. Effects of permeant cations and permeant anions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Oct 13;449(1):95–107. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(76)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pain D., Blobel G. Protein import into chloroplasts requires a chloroplast ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(10):3288–3292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pfanner N., Neupert W. Transport of F1-ATPase subunit beta into mitochondria depends on both a membrane potential and nucleoside triphosphates. FEBS Lett. 1986 Dec 15;209(2):152–156. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)81101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Portis A. R., Jr, McCarty R. E. Quantitative relationships between phosphorylation, electron flow, and internal hydrogen ion concentrations in spinach chloroplasts. J Biol Chem. 1976 Mar 25;251(6):1610–1617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reed P. W. Ionophores. Methods Enzymol. 1979;55:435–454. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(79)55058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rottenberg H., Grunwald T. Determination of pH in chloroplasts. 3. Ammonium uptake as a measure of pH in chloroplasts and sub-chloroplast particles. Eur J Biochem. 1972 Jan 31;25(1):71–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb01668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuldiner S., Rottenberg H., Avron M. Determination of pH in chloroplasts. 2. Fluorescent amines as a probe for the determination of pH in chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem. 1972 Jan 31;25(1):64–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb01667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stiehl H. H., Witt H. T. Quantitative treatment of the function of plastoquinone in phostosynthesis. Z Naturforsch B. 1969 Dec;24(12):1588–1598. doi: 10.1515/znb-1969-1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verner K., Schatz G. Import of an incompletely folded precursor protein into isolated mitochondria requires an energized inner membrane, but no added ATP. EMBO J. 1987 Aug;6(8):2449–2456. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02524.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Whitmarsh J., Cramer W. A. Cytochrome f function in photosynthetic electron transport. Biophys J. 1979 May;26(2):223–234. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85246-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES