Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 Jun;102(2):467–472. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.2.467

Compartmentation Analysis of Paraquat Fluxes in Maize Roots as a Means of Estimating the Rate of Vacuolar Accumulation and Translocation to Shoots.

J M DiTomaso 1, J J Hart 1, L V Kochian 1
PMCID: PMC158800  PMID: 12231834

Abstract

Efflux analysis conducted after five loading periods of various lengths (2, 6, 12, 18, or 24 h) was used to investigate uptake, compartmentation, and translocation of [14C]paraquat in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. The time course for net paraquat uptake (paraquat concentration in uptake solution = 25[mu]M) into maize roots was linear (56.7 nmol g-1 root fresh weight h-1) for 24 h. Estimates of changes in paraquat content in the vacuole, cytoplasm, and cell wall after 2-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-h loading periods indicated that the cell wall saturated rapidly, whereas accumulation of paraquat into the vacuole increased linearly (12.4 nmol g-1 root fresh weight h-1) over 24 h. In contrast to vacuolar accumulation, cytoplasmic paraquat content appeared to approach saturation. The half-time for paraquat efflux from the cell wall (16.6 min [plus or minus] 1.2 SD) and cytoplasm (58.8 min [plus or minus] 8.9 SD remained relatively constant regardless of the length of the loading period, whereas the half-time for efflux from the vacuole was considerably longer and increased linearly with increased loading time (6.1-18.7 h). The time course for paraquat translocation to the shoot was linear within a 24-h exposure to radiolabeled herbicide, but translocation did not begin until 5 h after initiation of treatment. The experimental approach used in these experiments provides a valuable method for examining the movement of paraquat in maize seedlings. Results indicate that the herbicide slowly accumulates in the vacuole of root cells but is also translocated to the shoot.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (577.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cheeseman J. M. Compartmental efflux analysis: an evaluation of the technique and its limitations. Plant Physiol. 1986 Apr;80(4):1006–1011. doi: 10.1104/pp.80.4.1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cram W. J. Compartmentation and exchange of chloride in carrot root tissue. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Nov 5;163(3):339–353. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(68)90119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ditomaso J. M., Hart J. J., Kochian L. V. Transport kinetics and metabolism of exogenously applied putrescine in roots of intact maize seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1992 Feb;98(2):611–620. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.2.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kochian L. V., Lucas W. J. Potassium transport in corn roots : I. Resolution of kinetics into a saturable and linear component. Plant Physiol. 1982 Dec;70(6):1723–1731. doi: 10.1104/pp.70.6.1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pierce W. S., Higinbotham N. Compartments and Fluxes of K, NA, and CL in Avena Coleoptile Cells. Plant Physiol. 1970 Nov;46(5):666–673. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.5.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rauser W. E. Compartmental efflux analysis and removal of extracellular cadmium from roots. Plant Physiol. 1987 Sep;85(1):62–65. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES