Abstract
The effects of CO2 and O2 on nonsteady-state photosynthesis following an increase in photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) were examined in Spinacia oleracea to investigate the hypotheses that (a) a slow exponential phase (the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase [Rubisco] phase) of nonsteady-state photosynthesis is primarily limited by Rubisco activity and (b) Rubisco activation involves two sequential, light-dependent processes as described in a previous study (I.E. Woodrow, K.A. Mott [1992] Plant Physiol 99: 298-303). Photosynthesis was found to be sensitive to O2 during the Rubisco phase in the approach of photosynthesis to steady state. Analyses of this sensitivity to O2 showed that the control coefficient for Rubisco was approximately equal to 1 during this phase, suggesting that Rubisco was the primary limitation to photosynthesis. O2 had almost no effect on the kinetics (described using a relaxation time, [tau] of the Rubisco phase for leaves starting in darkness or for leaves starting in low PPFD, but [tau] was substantially higher in the former case. CO2 was found to affect both the rate of photosynthesis and the magnitude of [tau] for the Rubisco phase. The [tau] value for the Rubisco phase was found to be negatively correlated with intercellular CO2 concentration (ci), and leaves starting in darkness had higher values of [tau] at any ci than leaves starting in low PPFD. The effects of CO2 and O2 on the Rubisco phase are consistent with the existence of two sequential, light-dependent processes in the activation of Rubisco if neither process is sensitive to O2 and only the second process is sensitive to CO2. The implications of the data for the mechanism of Rubisco activation and for the effects of stomatal conductance on nonsteady-state photosynthesis are discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (739.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lan Y., Mott K. A. Determination of Apparent K(m) Values for Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase (Rubisco) Activase Using the Spectrophotometric Assay of Rubisco Activity. Plant Physiol. 1991 Feb;95(2):604–609. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.2.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan Y., Woodrow I. E., Mott K. A. Light-dependent changes in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activase activity in leaves. Plant Physiol. 1992 May;99(1):304–309. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miziorko H. M., Lorimer G. H. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52:507–535. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.002451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mott K. A. Do Stomata Respond to CO(2) Concentrations Other than Intercellular? Plant Physiol. 1988 Jan;86(1):200–203. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sassenrath-Cole G. F., Pearcy R. W. The Role of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Regeneration in the Induction Requirement of Photosynthetic CO(2) Exchange under Transient Light Conditions. Plant Physiol. 1992 May;99(1):227–234. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodrow I. E., Mott K. A. Biphasic Activation of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase in Spinach Leaves as Determined from Nonsteady-State CO(2) Exchange. Plant Physiol. 1992 May;99(1):298–303. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]