Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 Oct;103(2):429–434. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.2.429

Cell Wall Metabolism in Ripening Fruit (VI. Effect of the Antisense Polygalacturonase Gene on Cell Wall Changes Accompanying Ripening in Transgenic Tomatoes).

CMS Carrington 1, L C Greve 1, J M Labavitch 1
PMCID: PMC159000  PMID: 12231951

Abstract

Cell walls of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit, prepared so as to minimize residual hydrolytic activity and autolysis, exhibit increasing solubilization of pectins as ripening proceeds, and this process is not evident in fruit from transgenic plants with the antisense gene for polygalacturonase (PG). A comparison of activities of a number of possible cell wall hydrolases indicated that antisense fruit differ from control fruit specifically in their low PG activity. The composition of cell wall fractions of mature green fruit from transgenic and control (wild-type) plants were indistinguishable except for trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N[prime],N[prime]-tetraacetic acid (CDTA)-soluble pectins of transgenic fruit, which had elevated levels of arabinose and galactose. Neutral polysaccharides and polyuronides increased in the water-soluble fraction of wild-type fruit during ripening, and this was matched by a decline in Na2CO3-soluble pectins, equal in magnitude and timing. This, together with compositional analysis showing increasing galactose, arabinose, and rhamnose in the water-soluble fraction, mirrored by a decline of these same residues in the Na2CO3-soluble pectins, suggests that the polyuronides and neutral polysaccharides solubilized by PG come from the Na2CO3-soluble fraction of the tomato cell wall. In addition to the loss of galactose from the cell wall as a result of PG activity, both antisense and control fruit exhibit an independent decline in galactose in both the CDTA-soluble and Na2CO3-soluble fractions, which may play a role in fruit softening.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (610.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumenkrantz N., Asboe-Hansen G. New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. Anal Biochem. 1973 Aug;54(2):484–489. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell A. D., Huysamer M., Stotz H. U., Greve L. C., Labavitch J. M. Comparison of ripening processes in intact tomato fruit and excised pericarp discs. Plant Physiol. 1990 Dec;94(4):1582–1589. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.4.1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dellapenna D., Kates D. S., Bennett A. B. Polygalacturonase Gene Expression in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruits. Plant Physiol. 1987 Oct;85(2):502–507. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.2.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gross K. C., Wallner S. J. Degradation of Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Tomato Fruit Ripening. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jan;63(1):117–120. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayashi T., Maclachlan G. Pea xyloglucan and cellulose : I. Macromolecular organization. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jul;75(3):596–604. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.3.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koch J. L., Nevins D. J. Tomato fruit cell wall : I. Use of purified tomato polygalacturonase and pectinmethylesterase to identify developmental changes in pectins. Plant Physiol. 1989 Nov;91(3):816–822. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.3.816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pressey R. beta-Galactosidases in Ripening Tomatoes. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jan;71(1):132–135. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.1.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Selvendran R. R., O'Neill M. A. Isolation and analysis of cell walls from plant material. Methods Biochem Anal. 1987;32:25–153. doi: 10.1002/9780470110539.ch2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sheehy R. E., Kramer M., Hiatt W. R. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8805–8809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith C. J., Watson C. F., Morris P. C., Bird C. R., Seymour G. B., Gray J. E., Arnold C., Tucker G. A., Schuch W., Harding S. Inheritance and effect on ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 Mar;14(3):369–379. doi: 10.1007/BF00028773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tieman D. M., Harriman R. W., Ramamohan G., Handa A. K. An Antisense Pectin Methylesterase Gene Alters Pectin Chemistry and Soluble Solids in Tomato Fruit. Plant Cell. 1992 Jun;4(6):667–679. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.6.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wallner S. J., Walker J. E. Glycosidases in Cell Wall-degrading Extracts of Ripening Tomato Fruits. Plant Physiol. 1975 Jan;55(1):94–98. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES