Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1993 Dec;103(4):1189–1194. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1189

The Interactive Effects of pH, L-Malate, and Glucose-6-Phosphate on Guard-Cell Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase.

M C Tarczynski 1, W H Outlaw Jr 1
PMCID: PMC159105  PMID: 12232011

Abstract

The interactive effects of pH, L-malate, and glucose-6-phosphate (Glc-6-P) on the Vmax and Km of guard-cell (GC) phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase (PEPC) of Vicia faba L. were determined. Leaves of three different physiological states (closed stomata, opening stomata, open stomata) were rapidly frozen and freeze dried. GC pairs dissected from the leaves were individually extracted and individually assayed for the kinetic properties of PEPC. Vmax was 6 to 9 pmol GC pair-1 h-1 and was apparently unaffected to a biologically significant extent by the investigated physiological states of the leaf, pH (7.0 or 8.5), L-malate (0, 5, or 15 mM), and Glc-6-P (0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.7, or 5 mM). As reported earlier, the Km(PEP.Mg) was about 0.2 mM (pH 8.5) or 0.7 mM (pH 7.0), which can be compared with a GC [PEP] of 0.27 mM. In the study reported here, we determined that the in situ GC [Glc-6-P] equals approximately 0.6 to 1.2 mM. When 0.5 mM Glc-6-P was included in the GC PEPC assay mixture, the Km(PEP.Mg) decreased to about 0.1 mM (pH 8.5) or 0.2 mM (pH 7.0). Thus, Glc-6-P at endogenous concentrations would seem both to activate the enzyme and to diminish the dramatic effect of pH on Km(PEP.Mg). Under assay conditions, L-malate is an inhibitor of GC PEPC. In planta, cytoplasmic [L-malate] is approximately 8 mM. Inclusion of 5 mM L-malate increased the Km(PEP.Mg) to about 3.6 mM (pH 7.0) or 0.4 mM (pH 8.5). Glc-6-P (0.5 mM) was sufficient to relieve L-malate inhibition completely at pH 8.5. In contrast, approximately 5 mM Glc-6-P was required to relieve L-malate inhibition at pH 7.0. No biologically significant effect of physiological state of the tissue on GC PEPC Km(PEP.Mg) (regardless of the presence of effectors) was observed. Together, these results are consistent with a model that GC PEPC is regulated by its cytosolic chemical environment and not by posttranslational modification that is detectable at physiological levels of effectors. It is important to note, however, that we did not determine the phosphorylation status of GC PEPC directly or indirectly (by comparison of the concentration of L-malate that causes a 50% inhibition of GC PEPC).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (698.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bakrim N., Echevarria C., Cretin C., Arrio-Dupont M., Pierre J. N., Vidal J., Chollet R., Gadal P. Regulatory phosphorylation of Sorghum leaf phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Identification of the protein-serine kinase and some elements of the signal-transduction cascade. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Mar 1;204(2):821–830. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baur B., Dietz K. J., Winter K. Regulatory protein phosphorylation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in the facultative crassulacean-acid-metabolism plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Oct 1;209(1):95–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodson M. J., Outlaw W. H., Jr, Silvers S. H. Malate content of picoliter samples of Raphanus sativus cytoplasm. J Histochem Cytochem. 1991 Apr;39(4):435–440. doi: 10.1177/39.4.2005372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang K., Roberts J. K. Observation of Cytoplasmic and Vacuolar Malate in Maize Root Tips by C-NMR Spectroscopy. Plant Physiol. 1989 Jan;89(1):197–203. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chi M. M., Lowry C. V., Lowry O. H. An improved enzymatic cycle for nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate. Anal Biochem. 1978 Aug 15;89(1):119–129. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90732-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiao J. A., Chollet R. Posttranslational regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in c(4) and crassulacean Acid metabolism plants. Plant Physiol. 1991 Apr;95(4):981–985. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.4.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiao J., Echevarría C., Vidal J., Chollet R. Protein turnover as a component in the light/dark regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase protein-serine kinase activity in C4 plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 1;88(7):2712–2715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Van Quy, Champigny M. L. NO(3) Enhances the Kinase Activity for Phosphorylation of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and Sucrose Phosphate Synthase Proteins in Wheat Leaves: Evidence from the Effects of Mannose and Okadaic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1992 May;99(1):344–347. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lepiniec L., Keryer E., Philippe H., Gadal P., Crétin C. Sorghum phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene family: structure, function and molecular evolution. Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Feb;21(3):487–502. doi: 10.1007/BF00028806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer C. R., Rustin P., Wedding R. T. A simple and accurate spectrophotometric assay for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity. Plant Physiol. 1988 Feb;86(2):325–328. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.2.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miziorko H. M., Nowak T., Mildvan A. S. Spinach leaf phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase: purification, properties, and kinetic studies. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1974 Jul;163(1):378–389. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(74)90489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Outlaw W. H., Kennedy J. Enzymic and substrate basis for the anaplerotic step in guard cells. Plant Physiol. 1978 Oct;62(4):648–652. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.4.648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Outlaw W. H., Manchester J., Dicamelli C. A. Histochemical Approach to Properties of Vicia faba Guard Cell Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase. Plant Physiol. 1979 Aug;64(2):269–272. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Outlaw W. H., Springer S. A., Tarczynski M. C. Histochemical technique : a general method for quantitative enzyme assays of single cell ;extracts' with a time resolution of seconds and a reading precision of femtomoles. Plant Physiol. 1985 Mar;77(3):659–666. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.3.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WILKINSON G. N. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J. 1961 Aug;80:324–332. doi: 10.1042/bj0800324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WOLD F., BALLOU C. E. Studies on the enzyme enolase. I. Equilibrium studies. J Biol Chem. 1957 Jul;227(1):301–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Y. H., Duff S. M., Lepiniec L., Crétin C., Sarath G., Condon S. A., Vidal J., Gadal P., Chollet R. Site-directed mutagenesis of the phosphorylatable serine (Ser8) in C4 phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from sorghum. The effect of negative charge at position 8. J Biol Chem. 1992 Aug 25;267(24):16759–16762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wedding R. T., Black M. K. Role of Magnesium in the Binding of Substrate and Effectors to Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase from a CAM Plant. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jun;87(2):443–446. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.2.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wedding R. T., Rustin P., Meyer C. R., Black M. K. Kinetic studies of the form of substrate bound by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. Plant Physiol. 1988 Dec;88(4):976–979. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.4.976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu M. X., Meyer C. R., Willeford K. O., Wedding R. T. Regulation of the aggregation state of maize phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase: evidence from dynamic light-scattering measurements. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990 Sep;281(2):324–329. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90451-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES