Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Jan;104(1):227–234. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.1.227

The Effects of Illumination on the Xanthophyll Composition of the Photosystem II Light-Harvesting Complexes of Spinach Thylakoid Membranes.

A V Ruban 1, A J Young 1, A A Pascal 1, P Horton 1
PMCID: PMC159181  PMID: 12232075

Abstract

The xanthophyll composition of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b proteins of photosystem II (LHCII) has been determined for spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves after dark adaptation and following illumination under conditions optimized for conversion of violaxanthin into zeaxanthin. Each of the four LHCII components was found to have a unique xanthophyll composition. The major carotenoid was lutein, comprising 60% of carotenoid in the bulk LHCIIb and 35 to 50% in the minor LHCII components LHCIIa, LHCIIc, and LHCIId. The percent of carotenoid found in the xanthophyll cycle pigments was approximately 10 to 15% in LHCIIb and 30 to 40% in LHCIIa, LHCIIc, and LHCIId. The xanthophyll cycle was active for the pigments bound to all of the LHCII components. The extent of deepoxidation for complexes prepared from light-treated leaves was 27, 65, 69, and 43% for LHCIIa, -b, -c, and -d, respectively. These levels of conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin were found in LHCII prepared by three different isolation procedures. It was estimated that approximately 50% of the zeaxanthin associated with photosystem II is in LHCIIb and 30% is associated with the minor LHCII components.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassi R., Pineau B., Dainese P., Marquardt J. Carotenoid-binding proteins of photosystem II. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Mar 1;212(2):297–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilger W., Björkman O., Thayer S. S. Light-induced spectral absorbance changes in relation to photosynthesis and the epoxidation state of xanthophyll cycle components in cotton leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989 Oct;91(2):542–551. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briantais J. M., Vernotte C., Picaud M., Krause G. H. A quantitative study of the slow decline of chlorophyll a fluorescence in isolated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Oct 10;548(1):128–138. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(79)90193-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horton P., Ruban A. V., Rees D., Pascal A. A., Noctor G., Young A. J. Control of the light-harvesting function of chloroplast membranes by aggregation of the LHCII chlorophyll-protein complex. FEBS Lett. 1991 Nov 4;292(1-2):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80819-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Irrgang K. D., Renger G., Vater J. Isolation, purification and partial characterization of a 30-kDa chlorophyll-a/b-binding protein from spinach. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Oct 15;201(2):515–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Siefermann D., Yamamoto H. Y. Light-induced de-epoxidation of violaxanthin in lettuce chloroPLASTS. III. Reaction kinetics and effect of light intensity on de-epoxidase activity and substrate availability. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Jul 25;357(1):144–150. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thornber J. P., Peter G. F., Morishige D. T., Gómez S., Anandan S., Welty B. A., Lee A., Kerfeld C., Takeuchi T., Preiss S. Light harvesting in photosystems I and II. Biochem Soc Trans. 1993 Feb;21(1):15–18. doi: 10.1042/bst0210015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES