Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Jan;104(1):247–254. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.1.247

Transient Responses of Cell Turgor and Growth of Maize Roots as Affected by Changes in Water Potential.

J Frensch 1, T C Hsiao 1
PMCID: PMC159183  PMID: 12232076

Abstract

Transient responses of cell turgor (P) and root elongation to changes in water potential were measured in maize (Zea mays L.) to evaluate mechanisms of adaptation to water stress. Changes of water potential were induced by exposing roots to solutions of KCl and mannitol (osmotic pressure about 0.3 MPa). Prior to a treatment, root elongation was about 1.2 mm h-1 and P was about 0.67 MPa across the cortex of the expansion zone (3-10 mm behind the root tip). Upon addition of an osmoticum, P decreased rapidly and growth stopped completely at pressure below approximately 0.6 MPa, which indicated that the yield threshold (Ytrans,1) was just below the initial turgor. Turgor recovered partly within the next 30 min and reached a new steady value at about 0.53 MPa. The root continued to elongate as soon as P rose above a new threshold (Ytrans,2) of about 0.45 MPa. The time between Ytrans,1 and Ytrans,2 was about 10 min. During this transition turgor gradients of as much as 0.15 MPa were measured across the cortex. They resulted from a faster rate of turgor recovery of cells deeper inside the tissue compared with cells near the root periphery. Presumably, the phloem was the source of the compounds for the osmotic adjustment. Turgor recovery was restricted to the expansion zone, as was confirmed by measurements of pressure kinetics in mature root tissue. Withdrawal of the osmoticum caused an enormous transient increase of elongation, which was related to only a small initial increase of P. Throughout the experiment, the relationship between root elongation rate and turgor was nonlinear. Consequently, when Y were calculated from steady-state conditions of P and root elongation before and after the osmotic treatment, Yss was only 0.21 MPa and significantly smaller compared with the values obtained from direct measurements (0.42-0.64 MPa). Thus, we strongly emphasize the need for measurements of short-term responses of elongation and turgor to determine cell wall mechanics appropriately. Our results indicate that the rate of solute flow into the growth zone could become rate-limiting for cell expansion under conditions of mild water stress.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (797.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cosgrove D. Biophysical control of plant cell growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1986;37:377–405. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.37.060186.002113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hohl M., Schopfer P. Water Relations of Growing Maize Coleoptiles : Comparison between Mannitol and Polyethylene Glycol 6000 as External Osmotica for Adjusting Turgor Pressure. Plant Physiol. 1991 Mar;95(3):716–722. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.3.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lockhart J. A. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. J Theor Biol. 1965 Mar;8(2):264–275. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(65)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nonami H., Boyer J. S. Wall extensibility and cell hydraulic conductivity decrease in enlarging stem tissues at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1990 Aug;93(4):1610–1619. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.4.1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Saab I. N., Sharp R. E., Pritchard J. Effect of inhibition of abscisic Acid accumulation on the spatial distribution of elongation in the primary root and mesocotyl of maize at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1992 May;99(1):26–33. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Serpe M. D., Matthews M. A. Rapid Changes in Cell Wall Yielding of Elongating Begonia argenteo-guttata L. Leaves in Response to Changes in Plant Water Status. Plant Physiol. 1992 Dec;100(4):1852–1857. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.4.1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shackel K. A., Matthews M. A., Morrison J. C. Dynamic Relation between Expansion and Cellular Turgor in Growing Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1987 Aug;84(4):1166–1171. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharp R. E., Silk W. K., Hsiao T. C. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials : I. Spatial distribution of expansive growth. Plant Physiol. 1988 May;87(1):50–57. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Spollen W. G., Sharp R. E. Spatial distribution of turgor and root growth at low water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jun;96(2):438–443. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.2.438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tomos A. D., Malone M., Pritchard J. The biophysics of differential growth. Environ Exp Bot. 1989 Jan;29(1):7–23. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(89)90035-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu G. L., Steudle E. Water Transport across Maize Roots : Simultaneous Measurement of Flows at the Cell and Root Level by Double Pressure Probe Technique. Plant Physiol. 1991 Jan;95(1):305–315. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.1.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES