Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2002 Oct;23(3):207–214. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00499-3

Predictors of Cervical Pap Smear Screening Awareness, Intention, and Receipt Among Vietnamese-American Women

Tung T Nguyen 1,, Stephen J McPhee 1, Thoa Nguyen 1, Tram Lam 1, Jeremiah Mock 1
PMCID: PMC1592337  NIHMSID: NIHMS11896  PMID: 12350454

Abstract

Background

Compared with white women, Vietnamese women in the United States have a higher rate of cervical cancer and lower Papanicolau (Pap) test utilization. We evaluated factors associated with awareness of the Pap test, intention to obtain it, and its receipt in Vietnamese-American women.

Methods

In 2000, we conducted a telephone survey of Vietnamese-American women aged ≥18 years living in Santa Clara County, California, and Harris County, Texas. We collected data on sociodemographics, healthcare system access and attitudes, as well as Pap test awareness, attitudes, intentions, and practices.

Results

Of 1566 subjects, 74% had heard of the Pap test, and 76% had had at least one. Only 42% of those who never had a Pap test had considered obtaining one. There were no significant differences between the two sites. Women aged ≥65 had the lowest rates for all three outcomes. For all women, younger age, being married, having requested a Pap test, physician recommendation, and preferring a female standby if the doctor was male were associated with Pap test intention. Being married, higher level of education, having a female doctor, having a respectful doctor, having requested the test, and physician recommendation were associated with Pap test receipt.

Conclusion

Vietnamese-American women have low rates of Pap test awareness, intention, and receipt. The patient–doctor interaction is an important determinant. Efforts to increase Pap test utilization in this population need to be directed at encouraging physicians to offer the Pap test and empowering women to ask for the test.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): cervix neoplasms, ethnology, female, health behavior, health services accessibility, mass screening, patient acceptance of health care, primary prevention, Vietnam

Background

From 1988 to 1992, the age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rate among Vietnamese-American women (43.0/100,000) was the highest of any ethnic group in the United States and 5 times that of whites (8.7/100,000).1 For women aged 55 to 69, the rate was 10 times higher (181.6/100,000 vs 17.8/ 100,000).1 Unpublished California data indicate that Vietnamese-American women are diagnosed at later stages compared with the general population (B. Topol, Northern California Cancer Center, personal communication, 1995).

Risk factors for cervical cancer, such as sexual behavior or human papillomavirus prevalence, are largely unstudied in Vietnamese-American women. National data for 2000 show that 95.8% of white, 95.4% of African-American, and 92.9% of Hispanic women aged ≥18 reported receiving at least one Papanicolau (Pap) test, while 69.6%, 77.1%, and 75.8%, respectively, had one in the last year.2 In contrast, recent data for Vietnamese-American women showed rates at or near 67% and 48%, respectively.36 Since sexual behavior data are often unavailable or unreliable, the National Cancer Institute considers women who have never had a Pap test and those without recent tests at high risk for cervical cancer.7

We recently launched a controlled intervention trial to increase Pap test awareness, intention, and receipt in Vietnamese-American women in Santa Clara County, California. In 2000, there were 99,986 Vietnamese in Santa Clara County and 58,357 in the control community of Harris County, Texas.8 The conceptual basis for our interventions and this article is the “pathways” model, which originated in the PRECEDE/PROCEED planning framework.911 Pathways differentiates between first screening and repeat screening outcomes. The model posits that early cancer detection involves a series of ordered events, each with its own set of predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors. Patients negotiate the community/sociocultural pathway with determinants such as socioeconomic status, culture, access, social reinforcement, and exposure to information. Providers negotiate the medical care pathway. Cultural concordance, patient education, and system capacity are the components of the interaction between these pathways and are the final determinants of screening receipt. This article presents the results of a pre-intervention survey and addresses the community/sociocultural pathway and its interaction with the medical pathway as determinants of first Pap test receipt.

Methods

Survey Development and Administration

Based on prior experience, we developed a 15-minute, computer-assisted telephone interview survey in English.1215 The instrument was translated into Vietnamese, back-translated into English, pilot tested, and approved by the University of California, San Francisco, Committee on Human Research. The survey was administered between October 2000 and December 2000. Fourteen trained, bilingual interviewers conducted the survey in the language chosen by the respondents. Interviews were monitored. We made minor revisions to the survey after 60 pre-test interviews.

Survey Measures and Variables

Socioeconomic variables included age, marital status, education, employment, and income. We defined marital status as “never married” or “married,” which encompassed those who were married, divorced, widowed, separated, or living with a partner. Poverty status was established using 1999 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services criteria for household income. Acculturation was estimated by using year of immigration and English-language proficiency.

Awareness of cervical cancer and its risks and causes constituted exposure to relevant information. We assessed beliefs and attitudes by asking when women should have a Pap test, who should obtain one, and if they should see a doctor for a checkup, even if well.

For health status and behavior, respondents reported self-perceived health and tobacco exposure. For access, we asked if respondents had health insurance, a regular place of care, and a regular doctor. Cultural access was measured by asking if they had a Vietnamese doctor, a female doctor, and a translator, if needed. Social reinforcement was assessed by preference for a female standby if the doctor performing the Pap test was male.

To evaluate pathways interaction, we asked respondents about their perception of the provider and the system. For cultural concordance, we asked women if they preferred a female doctor and a Vietnamese doctor. We assessed quality of communication by inquiring if respondents perceived that their physicians were able to explain things clearly and to treat them respectfully. We also asked if the women had ever requested a Pap or if a doctor had ever offered one. Respondents also reported their level of trust of physicians and their perception of healthcare system bias against non-English speakers or ethnic minorities.

Our primary outcome variables were Pap test awareness, intention, and receipt. Pap test awareness was a positive response to the following question: “Have you ever heard of a ‘Pap test’?” Pap test receipt was defined as a positive response to “Have you ever had a ‘Pap test’?” after describing the test. For “no” responses, we defined Pap test intention as a positive response to “Are you planning on obtaining a ‘Pap test’?” Those who had a Pap test reported the date of the last test and their plan to obtain another in the next year.

Sampling

Using telephone directories and 37 Vietnamese surnames that account for 99% of Vietnamese surnames—Bui, Cao, Diep, Duong, Dao, Dang, Dinh, Doan, Do, Ha, Hoang, Huynh, Ho, Khuu, Lam, Le, Ly, Luong, Luu, Mai, Ngo, Nguyen, Pham, Phan, Phung, Quach, Quan, Ta, To, Ton, Tran, Trieu, Trinh, Truong, Vu, Vo, Vuong—a sampling company created sampling frames of 4699 telephone numbers in Santa Clara County and 3985 in Harris County.16 Of 2078 (44%) working household numbers in Santa Clara, we screened 1377 (66%), yielding 1265 (92%) eligible respondents. For Harris County, the numbers were 2438 (61%), 1499 (61%), and 1412 (94%), respectively. Eligible respondents were female, aged ≥18 years, a resident in either county, and self-identified as Vietnamese, Vietnamese-American, or Vietnamese-Chinese (ethnic Chinese who were born or had lived in Vietnam). In households with more than one eligible respondent, we randomly selected one woman.

Statistical Analysis

We conducted statistical analyses using the SAS program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We used chi-square tests of contingency for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables to identify significant differences by site. Chi-square tests were also used to evaluate differences in cervical cancer outcomes among respondents by age (18 to 39, 40 to 64, and ≥65 years). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Women who had a hysterectomy were excluded from the analysis for the variables “last Pap within 1 year,” “plan to get next Pap test in next 1 year if have had one,” and “have thought about getting a Pap test if never had one.”

For multivariate analyses, multiple logistic regression models were specified separately for the three outcome variables: (1) Pap test awareness; (2) Pap test intention; and (3) Pap test receipt. A set of core variables were forced into the model for face validity, including study site, sociodemographics, health status, and access to health care. For the outcomes Pap test intention and Pap test receipt, attitudes about healthcare providers were included. All other variables were assessed for model fitness based on a significance level of p = 0.10.

Results

Response Rates

Overall, of 2677 eligible women, 1566 (58%) completed surveys. The response rate was 63% in Santa Clara County and 54% in Harris County. Over 99% responded in Vietnamese.

Sociodemographic, general health care, and attitudinal characteristics

Table 1 shows respondents’ baseline characteristics. The mean ages were 45.2 years (Santa Clara) and 44.8 (Harris). There were no significant differences in length of U.S. residency, English fluency, education, employment, marital status, or overall health status. There was a significant, although small, income difference. Santa Clara women were significantly more likely to have health insurance and access to regular or culturally concordant care.

Table 1.

Demographics, general health care, and attitudinal characteristics

Variable Santa Clara County, California (n=798) Harris County, Texas (n=768) pvalue
Age, years, mean ± SD 45.2 ± 14.3 44.8 ± 14.1 0.62
Residency in the United States, years, mean ± SD 11.8 ± 8.4 12.1 ± 8.4 0.49
% n % n
Sociodemographics
English fluency, poor/not at all 38 306 40 304 0.62
Education, <high school completion 42 332 42 320 0.93
Employment, currently unemployed 43 343 40 307 0.34
Marital status, never married 10 76 11 87 0.25
Household income below poverty level 22 174 27 204 0.03
Health and access to health care
Health status, good/excellent 73 581 71 544 0.48
Never smoked cigarettes 99 787 97 745 0.03
Someone in household smokes cigarettes 32 255 37 281 0.05
Any insurance 69 550 59 452 <0.01
 Medicaid/Medi-Cal 32 253 16 125 <0.01
 Medicare 20 162 12 94 <0.01
 Private 25 202 22 170 0.15
 Health maintenance organization 41 328 33 253 <0.01
Have regular place for health care 93 738 85 647 <0.01
Have a regular doctor 85 679 76 587 <0.01
 Have a female doctor 30 203 24 140 0.05
 Have a Vietnamese doctor 86 586 81 475 0.02
Attitudes toward health/care system
Your doctor treats you with respect 94 751 92 700 0.04
Your doctor explains things to you in a way you can understand 84 668 82 623 0.28
You can trust doctors and other healthcare providers to do what is best for the patient almost all/most of the time 79 631 74 568 0.02
Healthcare system never treats people unfairly based on their race or ethnicity 69 428 59 344 <0.01
Healthcare system never treats people unfairly based on how well they speak English 66 422 58 347 <0.01

SD, standard deviation.

There were small, but significant, site differences in healthcare system attitudes. Harris County women were more likely to perceive healthcare system bias by race or language and less likely to trust doctors and to perceive that doctors treated them respectfully.

Site differences in cervical cancer and Pap test variables

Table 2 illustrates cervical cancer and Pap test outcomes. Most women had heard of cervical cancer, and one fourth thought that they were at high risk for it. Three fourths were aware of the Pap test, and three fourths of the total sample reported having had a Pap test. Of those who had a Pap test, approximately 80% had one within a year and most planned on obtaining another within the next year. Of those who never had one, nearly half had not thought about obtaining one. While 43% had requested a Pap test, only 53% to 60% reported that a doctor had recommended one. Santa Clara County women were significantly more likely to prefer a Vietnamese doctor, but not a female doctor or a female standby.

Table 2.

Cervical cancer and Papanicolau (Pap) test awareness, attitudes, intentions, and practices by site

Variable Santa Clara County, California (n=798) Harris County, Texas (n=768) pvalue
% n % n
Heard of cervical cancer 92 730 88 675 0.03
Think “almost certain” or “very likely” to develop cervical cancer 29 235 24 185 0.02
Heard of Pap testa 76 603 73 544 0.09
Ever had Pap testb 78 612 74 561 0.10
Last Pap within 1 year (if have had one)c 84 470 81 409 0.13
Plan to get next Pap test in next 1 year (if have had one)d 94 513 92 446 0.11
Thought about getting a Pap test (if never had one)c 40 64 44 84 0.47
Ever requested a Pap test 43 347 43 329 0.85
Doctor ever recommended a Pap test 60 478 53 403 <0.01
Prefer Vietnamese-speaking doctor for a Pap test 68 540 61 468 <0.01
Prefer female doctor for a Pap test 57 452 58 444 0.57
Prefer female standby if male doctor performs a Pap test 54 432 52 396 0.36
Have had a hysterectomy 6 46 6 44 0.98
a

Missing cases = 28.

b

Missing cases = 19.

c

Missing cases = 108.

d

Missing cases = 141.

e

Missing cases = 39.

Age differences in cervical cancer and Pap test variables

Table 3 shows results by age for cancer and Pap variables. Women aged ≥65 years were significantly less likely to have heard of cervical cancer or the Pap test, and were less likely to have had one. Of those who had one, women aged ≥65 were less likely to be up to date or to plan on another test in the next year. Of those who never had a Pap, only 20% of women aged ≥65 had thought about obtaining one. Similarly, women aged ≥65 were significantly less likely to request a Pap and to report that their doctors had offered it. Older women were significantly more likely to prefer a Vietnamese doctor, but not a female doctor or a female standby.

Table 3.

Cervical cancer and Papanicolau (Pap) test awareness, attitudes, intentions, and practices by age

Variable Age 18–39 years (n=576) Age 40–64 years (n=762) Age65 years (n=161) pvalue
% n % n % n
Heard of cervical cancer 88 507 94 716 81 129 <0.01
Think “almost certain” or “very likely” to develop cervical cancer 27 157 30 226 16 25 <0.01
Heard of Pap testa 72 406 80 602 62 98 <0.01
Ever had Pap testb 72 406 82 618 65 102 <0.01
Last Pap within 1 year (if have had one)c 85 315 82 464 74 64 0.03
Plan to get next Pap test in next 1 year (if have had one)d 93 336 95 513 85 71 <0.01
Thought about getting a Pap test (if never had one)c 45 68 45 59 20 11 <0.01
Ever requested a Pap test 41 236 49 372 30 48 <0.01
Doctor ever recommended a Pap test 53 303 61 461 52 83 0.01
Prefer Vietnamese-speaking doctor for a Pap test 52 301 70 533 79 127 <0.01
Prefer female doctor for Pap test 55 318 58 440 64 101 0.15
Prefer female standby if male doctor performs a Pap test 53 307 55 417 46 73 0.09
Have had a hysterectomy 4 21 8 51 10 16 <0.01
a

Missing cases = 26.

b

Missing cases = 16.

c

Missing cases = 105.

d

Missing cases = 138.

e

Missing cases = 37.

Multivariate Analysis

Table 4 presents results of the logistic regression models. Factors significantly associated with increased “Pap test awareness” were increasing age, greater English fluency, being married, higher educational attainment, having health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance, ever having requested a Pap, having a doctor recommend a Pap, and preferring a female standby. Factors significantly associated with lower Pap test awareness were low or unknown income, having Medicare insurance, and perceiving racial bias in the health-care system.

Table 4.

Multivariate results for Papanicolau (Pap) test awareness, intention, and receipt

Pap test awareness Pap test intention Pap test receipt
Model specification
Number of observations 1428 320 1441
Distribution of cases
 Yes 1078 133 1098
 No 350 187 343
Likelihood ratio (p value) 363.29 (<0.01) 103.99 (<0.01) 565.73 (<0.01)
Predicted probabilities
 % concordant 81.6 81.7 87.8
 % discordant 18.2 18.1 12.0
Independent variables OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age, each additional year 1.02 (1.01–1.03) 0.96 (0.94–0.99) 1.01 (0.99–1.02)
Residence in United States, each additional year 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.98 (0.94–1.02) 1.01 (0.99–1.04)
English fluency (fluent/well/so-so) 1.57 (1.11–2.21) 1.17 (0.57–2.41) 1.11 (0.75–1.63)
Married 2.70 (1.67–4.35) 3.74 (1.68–8.32) 5.49 (3.28–9.19)
Education
 Elementary 1.41 (0.68–2.94) 0.91 (0.22–3.72) 1.89 (0.86–4.16)
 High school 2.80 (1.28–6.12) 0.99 (0.22–4.47) 2.36 (1.03–5.44)
 University or higher 3.06 (1.33–6.99) 1.23 (0.26–5.97) 3.71 (1.53–8.99)
Income
 Below poverty level 0.59 (0.41–0.84) 1.43 (0.72–2.85) 0.87 (0.58–1.30)
 Don’t know 0.57 (0.38–0.83) 1.86 (0.85–4.09) 0.77 (0.49–1.19)
Employment status
Reside in Santa Clara County, CA 1.11 (0.83–1.50) 0.70 (0.39–1.25) 0.95 (0.68–1.32)
Excellent/good health 1.24 (0.90–1.71) 0.94 (0.49–1.83) 0.98 (0.68–1.42)
Tobacco exposure
Any health insurance 0.90 (0.63–1.29) 1.36 (0.67–2.77) 0.98 (0.65–1.48)
 Medicaid/Medi-Cal 1.11 (0.72–1.71) 0.97 (0.39–2.40) 1.31 (0.79–2.15)
 Medicare 0.56 (0.35–0.90) 0.83 (0.30–2.28) 0.60 (0.35–1.03)
 Private 1.13 (0.75–1.70) 1.21 (0.53–2.75) 1.05 (0.67–1.66)
 Health maintenance organization 1.75 (1.17–2.62) 1.22 (0.54–2.73) 1.52 (0.97–2.37)
Have regular place for health care 1.47 (0.94–2.30) 1.95 (0.89–4.25) 1.19 (0.68–2.08)
Have regular doctor
Have female doctor 1.85 (1.19–2.88)
Have Vietnamese doctor
Your doctor treats you with respect 1.52 (0.63–3.65) 1.98 (1.09–3.60)
Your doctor explains things to you in a way you can understand
You can trust doctors and other healthcare providers to do what is best for the patient almost all/most of time 1.13 (0.57–2.22) 0.72 (0.48–1.08)
Healthcare system treats people unfairly based on their race or ethnicity
 Very/somewhat/not too often 0.63 (0.45–0.89) 1.70 (0.75–3.83) 0.77 (0.47–1.25)
 Don’t know 0.92 (0.64–1.33) 1.70 (0.67–4.34) 1.06 (0.63–1.79)
Healthcare system treats people unfairly based on how well they speak English
 Very/somewhat/not too often 1.15 (0.51–2.60) 1.17 (0.72–1.92)
 Don’t know 0.93 (0.37–2.35) 0.83 (0.49–1.41)
Ever requested a Pap test 3.06 (2.23–4.20) 6.50 (2.48–17.03) 8.69 (5.82–12.97)
Doctor ever recommended a Pap test 2.93 (2.19–3.93) 4.73 (2.35–9.54) 7.98 (5.69–11.9)
Prefer Vietnamese-speaking doctor for a Pap test 0.53 (0.23–1.20)
Prefer female doctor for a Pap test
Prefer female standby if male doctor performs Pap test 1.35 (1.01–1.81) 1.82 (1.01–3.29)
How likely do you think it is that you will get cervical cancer?
 Almost/very/somewhat likely 1.07 (0.70–1.64) 0.47 (0.21–1.04)
 Don’t know 0.70 (0.44–1.12) 0.23 (0.09–0.56)

Note: Items in boldface have significant OR; em dash (—) indicates items not included in the model because original p>0.1. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

For those who never had a Pap, factors significantly associated with increased intention to obtain a Pap test were being married and preferring a female standby. Women who requested a Pap or whose doctor recommended one were nearly 7 and 5 times more likely, respectively, to intend on obtaining one. Factors significantly associated with decreased likelihood of Pap test intention were increasing age and not knowing cervical cancer risk.

Factors significantly associated with increased likelihood of Pap test receipt were being married and higher educational attainment. Women whose doctor was female and women who perceived that their doctor treated them respectfully were more likely to have had a Pap. Women who requested a Pap or whose doctor recommended one were nearly 9 and 8 times more likely, respectively, to have had one.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that while 90% of Vietnamese-American women have heard of cervical cancer, 25% have never heard of the Pap test. The overall Pap test receipt rate of 76% for Vietnamese-American women was lower than that of other ethnic groups and low-income urban minorities.2,1719 Paradoxically, 25% of the respondents believed that they were at high risk for cervical cancer, suggesting that public health efforts have succeeded in raising awareness if not screening. Yet increased awareness without an increase in screening may lead to anxiety.20

Our data support prior findings regarding the socio-demographic factors related to Pap test receipt in this population.36,21 The oldest women were less likely to have had a Pap test. If they had never had a Pap, they were less likely to intend on obtaining one. Women who were less educated, less fluent in English, and of low income had lower Pap test awareness. However, only education was associated with Pap test receipt. Income did not play a role, possibly reflecting the success of programs to deliver care to low-income women. English fluency may not play a role, since most of these women had Vietnamese doctors, but could be significant in areas with fewer Vietnamese doctors.22

As noted in earlier studies, married women were more likely to have heard of a Pap test, to intend on obtaining one, and to have had one.3,23,24 Married women may be more likely to visit a doctor for reproductive health care. Another explanation involves Vietnamese cultural attitudes regarding marriage and sex. In a study that included unmarried sexually active Vietnamese-American women, the belief that only married women needed a Pap was an important predictor of Pap test receipt.6 As a result, 39% of sexually active Vietnamese-American women, many of whom were unmarried, never had a Pap.6 Since premarital sex is stigmatized in Vietnamese culture, many Vietnamese physicians may assume that unmarried women are not sexually active and, thus, do not offer a Pap.22 Interventions to increase Pap test awareness and receipt should target unmarried women.

While lack of access to health care is an issue for Vietnamese-American women, as it is with other minorities, traditional access variables played a small role in Pap test outcomes in our study. Having HMO insurance was associated with increased Pap test awareness, likely through increased patient education by the HMO. Conversely, having Medicare insurance was associated with decreased Pap test awareness, perhaps reflecting physician preoccupation with other aspects of the older patient’s health. Additionally, Medicare reimbursement for Pap testing was limited prior to 2001.25 Physicians may have been reluctant to discuss a test if they thought that patients could not afford it. Although insurance was a significant factor in Pap test receipt in studies of other populations, as well as of Vietnamese-American women, we found no such effect even though one third of the women were uninsured.35,23,2629 This may reflect the success of screening programs for uninsured women.

Studies of Vietnamese-American women and other populations have showed that having a regular place of health care or a regular physician was positively associated with test receipt.4,17,2732 We did not find this effect. Access to culturally concordant care may be more important than access to any care for the provision of Pap tests to Vietnamese-American women.22 We found that respondents were more likely to have had a Pap if their doctor was female. Taylor also found that having a female physician was associated with recency of Pap testing in Cambodian women.33 Prior studies reveal that Vietnamese-American women with Vietnamese providers were actually less likely to receive Pap tests.35 This was not true in the present study, perhaps reflecting an increased orientation to preventive medicine among Vietnamese physicians and an increased proportion of female and U.S.-trained providers. Regardless of provider ethnicity, we found that women who perceived that they were treated respectfully were more likely to receive Pap tests, as previously observed in Hong Kong–Chinese women.34 This finding is particularly important for cultures that emphasize “face,” or respect for one’s position and dignity.

Among women who never had a Pap, preferring a female standby if the doctor was male was associated with increased intention to obtain the test. This may stem from the complex interplay between the traditional Vietnamese values of modesty, respect for authority, and conflict avoidance.22,35 These women may want the test but be reluctant to have a male provider perform it, and yet unwilling to challenge the provider by asking for a female standby.

In the Pathways model, the interaction between patient and provider is a crucial component of screening receipt. In breast cancer screening, physician recommendation has a powerful effect on mammography receipt in white and African-American women, older African-American and older Chinese-American women, other Asian women, and in women at different stages of mammography adoption.3645 In cervical cancer screening, physician recommendation has been correlated with Pap test receipt in Australian-Vietnamese women and Cambodian-American women.21,33 Similarly, women who request screening mammography are more likely to receive it.36 Filipina women who felt comfortable asking their physician for a mammogram were more likely to have had one.43 In the present study, the factors with the strongest effect on all three Pap test outcomes were patient request and physician recommendation.

Prior literature has suggested that cultural traits, such as traditional health beliefs and a lack of preventive care orientation, were significant barriers to medical care among the Vietnamese.35,46 Traditional access barriers were also important predictors of screening receipt.35 In this study, neither culture nor traditional access were highly significant predictors. The primary determinant was physician–patient interaction. This shift may reflect increasing acculturation and decreasing access barriers as policymakers become aware of health disparities in ethnic populations. Many Vietnamese-American women have been able to negotiate the community/sociocultural pathway, but the interaction with the medical pathway still presents barriers that are similar to the barriers for women from other ethnic groups. However, culture still matters. Effective interventions to empower Vietnamese-American women to request a Pap test from their physicians and to request a female standby from their male doctors must address specific cultural influences such as the reluctance to ask an authority figure for culturally appropriate care.22 Physician education should include culturally acceptable communication techniques and increasing awareness about cultural issues relating to sexuality, cervical cancer, and Pap testing.

This study has several limitations. Our results may not be generalizable because we had a response rate of 58% and only sampled two counties in two states. However, the sampled population comprises 15% of the overall U.S. Vietnamese population, and the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample are consistent with prior studies.35 Telephone sampling may have excluded a small number of women with unlisted numbers or no telephones. Due to the difficulty of asking culturally sensitive questions in a telephone survey, we did not ask about sexual behavior, a potentially more accurate predictor than marital status of Pap test behavior. Although we did describe the Pap test to respondents, self-reports may be inaccurate, as physicians may have used different terminology and respondents may not have distinguished between a pelvic examination, a “woman’s exam,” and a Pap test. Since many Vietnamese-American women obtain care from private practitioners, self-report validation would have been difficult.

Conclusion

The rates of Pap test awareness, intention, and receipt remain unacceptably low for Vietnamese-American women, who are at high risk for cervical cancer. Efforts to increase awareness should target women who are older, unmarried, less fluent in English, less educated, and of low income. Modifiable factors most significantly associated with Pap test intention and receipt are patient request for the test and physician recommendation of the test. Future interventions to increase Pap test receipt among Vietnamese-American women should empower them to request the test from their physicians and should encourage physicians to offer the test to these women in a culturally appropriate manner.

Footnotes

We are deeply indebted to Christopher N.H. Jenkins, MA, MPH (deceased) for project design and direction; to Belinda Young for statistical analysis; and to Ky Lai, MD, Ching Wong, and Hy Lam for their invaluable contributions to the implementation of this project. This project also would not have been possible without the direction of the 10 community organizations in the Vietnamese REACH for Health Initiative (VRHI) Coalition. Finally, we are grateful for the continuing support of our program officer, Sara L. McNary, MS, public health education specialist, Division of Adult and Community Health, REACH Program, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This research was supported by funds provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under cooperative agreement U50/CCU917412, and the Asian American Network for Cancer Awareness, Research, and Training through National Cancer Institute grant U01/CA86322-03.

References

  • 1.Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L, et al., editors. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States 1988–1992. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS) start page. [updated December 27, 2001; Accessed April 2, 2002.]. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/ [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ, Bird JA, et al. Effect of a media-led education campaign on breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-American women. Prev Med. 1999;28:395–406. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Davis T, Ha NT, Jenkins CN, Le B. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:205–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McPhee SJ, Stewart S, Brock KC, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Pham GQ. Factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Vietnamese American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 1997;21:510–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yi JK. Acculturation and Pap smear screening practices among college-aged Vietnamese women in the United States. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21:335–41. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199810000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.National Cancer Institute. Cancer.gov. Screening and testing for cancer, cervical cancer screening and testing, February 2002. [Accessed April 1, 2002]. Available at: http://nci.nih.gov/cancer_information/testing/ [Google Scholar]
  • 8.U.S. Census Bureau. American fact finder, 2000. [Accessed April 2, 2002]. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hiatt RA, Pasick R, Perez-Stable E, McPhee S, Englestad L, Lee M. Pathways to early cancer detection in the multiethnic population of the San Francisco Bay Area. Health Educ Q. 1996;23(suppl):10–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Green L, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Walsh JME, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:157–75. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McPhee SJ, Jenkins CNH, Hung S, Nguyen K-P, Bonilla N-TH. Behaviorial risk factor survey of Vietnamese in California—1991. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1992;41:69–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CNH, Ha NT, Le B. Pathways to early cancer detection for Vietnamese: Suc Khoe La Vang! (Health is Gold!) Health Educ Q. 1996;23(suppl):60–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Davis T, Ha NT, Jenkins CN, Le B. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:205–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McPhee SJ, Stewart S, Brock KC, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Pham GQ. Factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 1997;21:510–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Stewart SL, West DW, Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ. Accuracy of racial classification of Vietnamese patients in a population-based cancer registry. Ethn Dis. 1998;8:218–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, et al. Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med. 1999;28:418–25. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, Harding GH. Knowledge, attitudes, and patterns of cancer screening: a self-report among foreign-born Hispanic women utilizing rural migrant health clinics. J Rural Health. 1996;12:169–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1996.tb00791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Demographic predictors of cancer screening among Filipino and Korean immigrants in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:62–8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boonmongkon P, Pylypa J, Nichter M. Emerging fears of cervical cancer in Northeast Thailand. Anthropology Med. 1999;6:359–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheek J, Fuller J, Gilchrist S, Maddock A, Ballantyne A. Vietnamese women and Pap smears: issues in promotion. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:72–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McPhee SJ. Caring for a 70-year-old Vietnamese woman. JAMA. 2002;287:495–504. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.4.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hubbell FA, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. Beliefs about sexual behavior and other predictors of Papanicolaou smear screening among Latinas and Anglo women. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2353–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in U.S. women Am J Pub Health. 1993;83:53–60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.American College of Physicians, American Society of Internal Medicine. ACP-ASIM Observer: Medicare expands several of its screening policies. [Accessed April 14, 2002]. Available at: www.acponline.org/journals/news/jul01/screeningpol.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Faulkner LA, Schauffler HH. The effect of health insurance coverage on the appropriate use of recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:453–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Stewart AL. Primary care and receipt of preventive services. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:269–76. doi: 10.1007/BF02598266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, et al. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative. Prev Med. 2000;31:261–70. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jenkins CN, Le T, McPhee SJ, Stewart S, Ha NT. Health care access and preventive care among Vietnamese immigrants: do traditional beliefs and practices pose barriers? Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1049–56. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00368-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001;33:190–203. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ettner SL. The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1748–54. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.O’Malley AS, Mandelblatt J, Gold K, Cagney KA, Kerner J. Continuity of care and the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services in a multiethnic community. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1462–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taylor VM, Schwartz SM, Jackson JC, et al. Cervical cancer screening among Cambodian-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:541–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abdullah AS, Leung TY. Factors associated with the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Public Health. 2001;115:212–7. doi: 10.1038/sj/ph/1900753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hoang GN, Erickson RV. Guidelines for providing medical care to Southeast Asian refugees. JAMA. 1982;248:710–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hawley ST, Earp JA, O’Malley M, Ricketts TC. The role of physician recommendation in women’s mammography use: is it a 2-stage process? Med Care. 2000;38:392–403. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200004000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Glockner SM, Holden MG, Hilton SV, Norcross WA. Women’s attitudes toward screening mammography. Am J Prev Med. 1992;8:69–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women’s adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res. 1998;33:29–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Coleman EA, O’Sullivan PJ. Racial differences in breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age: trends from 1987–1993 and barriers to screening. J Women Aging. 2001;13:23–39. doi: 10.1300/J074v13n03_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhu K, Hunter S, Bernard LJ, Payne-Wilks K, Roland CL, Levine RS. Mammography screening in single older African-American women: a study of related factors. Ethn Dis. 2000;10:395–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tang TS, Solomon LJ, McCracken LM. Cultural barriers to mammography, clinical breast exam, and breast self-exam among Chinese-American women 60 and older. Prev Med. 2000;31:575–83. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Mammography utilization and related attitudes among Korean-American women. Women Health. 1998;27:89–107. doi: 10.1300/J013v27n03_07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Breast cancer screening and related attitudes among Filipino-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:719–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Skinner CS, Arfken CL, Sykes RK. Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:54–63. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stoddard AM, Rimer BK, Lane D, et al. Underusers of mammogram screening: stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium Prev Med. 1998;27:478–87. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hoang GN, Erickson RV. Cultural barriers to effective medical care among Indochinese patients. Annu Rev Med. 1985;36:229–239. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.36.020185.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES